R-E-L-A-X

[pbmax]

The speed argument if we didn't have clips of receivers open who are not even in the read progression of the offense.

[Radagast]

The speed argument if we didn't have clips of receivers open who are not even in the read progression of the offense.

pbmax, IMO, I see MM making a change with respect to Adams . Either Abby (my choice) or Montgomery will take his place for lack of effectiveness . Being slow with hands of stone are poor qualities in a WR . I'm putting my money on Nelson and Cook to step their play . Cobb remains the Packer's WR2 .

[Radagast]

The speed argument if we didn't have clips of receivers open who are not even in the read progression of the offense.

pbmax, IMO, I see MM making a change with respect to Adams . Either Abby (my choice) or Montgomery will take his place for lack of effectiveness . Being slow with hands of stone are poor qualities in a WR . I'm putting my money on Nelson and Cook to step their play . Cobb remains the Packer's WR2 .

[RashanGary]

#1 wr Cobb
#2 wr Nelson
#3 Dick rod
#4 cook (deep threat)
#5 anyone else

[King Friday]

King you keep making sense to me. You've obviously improved greatly, stick with those meds.

Lithium is a wonderful thing.

[texaspackerbacker]

A lot of support for the O Line in here hahahahaha. It's been said an O Line can't be expected to hold off the pass rush for 3-3.5 seconds. How about 1-1.5 seconds? If you actually watch the game, you see, that soon - almost immediately - Rodgers has people flushing him out of the pocket. Does he have a slow release? Of course not. Is he indecisive - beyond normal care to avoid interceptions? hell no. He is on the run, either hitting receivers on the run or resetting and throwing or taking off and running with great success. It is bonehead STUPID to whine about the time before he releases the ball under the circumstances! Would you guys rather have him chuck it quick for an interception? Would you rather he just stood there and took a bunch of sacks?

We've got the greatest QB in the NFL, maybe in the history of the NFL, and incredibly, he gets criticized because he is playing behind a mediocre at best O Line, because his coach forces a run-first situation which wastes downs and puts pressure on him to pass in obvious passing situations. I say again, it's bonehead STUPID to criticize him.

[MadScientist]

A lot of support for the O Line in here hahahahaha. It's been said an O Line can't be expected to hold off the pass rush for 3-3.5 seconds. How about 1-1.5 seconds? If you actually watch the game, you see, that soon - almost immediately - Rodgers has people flushing him out of the pocket. Does he have a slow release? Of course not. Is he indecisive - beyond normal care to avoid interceptions? hell no. He is on the run, either hitting receivers on the run or resetting and throwing or taking off and running with great success. It is bonehead STUPID to whine about the time before he releases the ball under the circumstances! Would you guys rather have him chuck it quick for an interception? Would you rather he just stood there and took a bunch of sacks?

We've got the greatest QB in the NFL, maybe in the history of the NFL, and incredibly, he gets criticized because he is playing behind a mediocre at best O Line, because his coach forces a run-first situation which wastes downs and puts pressure on him to pass in obvious passing situations. I say again, it's bonehead STUPID to criticize him.

I agree the O-line is far from stellar, and a run first strategy is not likely to give good results. However to pretend that everything is alright with Rodgers is just not a honest assessment. Just within last year alone Rodgers went from all-world the first six games to journeyman the rest. Something happened and he just isn't the same qb he was before.

[texaspackerbacker]

Maybe today's game will clear up some things. We're going against a depleted D Line and a team that hasn't been very good in general. Will the Packer O Line get beat anyway - not much push on running plays, allowing the pass rush to get through quick on passing plays? Will the line do a decent job and Rodgers flounder anyway? Will the line play like crap and Rodgers do a good job of escaping and being productive? Who knows!

Maybe the Vikings were just better on D than I and a lot of others give them credit for. Maybe a lot of teams have figured something out on how to greatly slow down the Packers. If we lose this game - not likely, or if we have it turned into a close stressful win like against Jacksonville, then the problems are real. The more likely scenario, though, is that a lot of people including me have just been taking the occasion of the loss following the stressful win to vent on a lot of crap that people have been upset about for quite a while but didn't feel like saying while the team was winning.

I'm leaning toward the R-E-L-A-X point of view at this point, thinking that things will return to Goodness and Normalcy today and moving forward ........ but who knows.

[Fritz]

Tex, we don't agree on the offensive line play and Rodgers' play, but we do agree that it's a good time to r-e-l-a-x and hope the Green and Gold can go out there and stomp the Lions.