Wasn't Monty more or less cleared to return? Maybe that was enough for TT. Davis wasn't all that impressive.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
More Banjo: Week 8 @ Falcons
Collapse
X
-
One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
-
Starks has looked no better than Knile or Action Jackson. He has had a real rough season. Maybe, just maybe, he was dealing with a nagging injury all along. He certainly didn't have his old burst.Originally posted by Pugger View PostDoes this mean Starks is ready to return?
I wish the Packers would cut Starks, but maybe they have reason to believe he can rebound.
Comment
-
they need a real running back. Monty is surprisingly good in the duel roll but with his condition they/he will really have to manage his hydration, oxygen, etc.Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View PostWasn't Monty more or less cleared to return? Maybe that was enough for TT. Davis wasn't all that impressive.
the extra work he's received the last few weeks probably brought this on.
Comment
-
-
-
Starks isn't on IR. Lacy and Shhields are.Originally posted by gbgary View Postthey can only bring back one from ir. why would it be starks?I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
I saw Gunter in single coverage on Jones most of the game and Goodson often single coverage on the other side too. Both were not great, but were fairly decent. I would liken most of our pass rushers to hitters in baseball with warning track power. They almost get the sack - almost only counting in horseshoes and hand grenades. Our home run hitter is Matthews, and I'd say we missed him yesterday. I'm one of those ready to lynch Randall, and I don't see our secondary as missing him much. Rollins, however, is a different story, as, of course, Shields is.Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post+1
It's the same ol' same ol' with this team. We can play with average to weak teams, but we figure out ways to lose to upper tier teams, i.e., teams with either an elite defense and/or an elite QB.
The problem is there is nothing elite about us.
Yes, we have injuries. Our starting CB's were out, as was Clay. To tell you the truth, Clay's loss didn't mean much considering how he's been playing this year (not to mention how little he's played). And people here were ready to lynch Randall for his poor play, now we're using his absence to excuse losing.
To compensate for the loss of our cornerbacks, we gave the youngsters help by playing a vanilla -- pseudo-prevent defense: rushing the passer with 2-4 players and dropping the rest into coverage. I suppose that's one way to handle it. But it wasn't working. At the half Atlanta was on pace to score 38 points. Another defensive coach might have endeavored to adjust, i.e., go all in on pressuring the QB in the second half. But that didn't happen. Apparently, Stubby and Dom were content with our defensive performance in the 1st half.
Except for Clay, the front seven were healthy AND I keep being told that we can generate pressure on the passer with the best of them. I just don't see it. It's kind of like being told time after time after time that we have the best QB in the league but not seeing much evidence of it, especially in the clutch.
Maybe I'm too old and cynical, but I've seen and heard all this crap before. We went into the season being hyped as a Super Bowl contender. Considering the strength of the schedule, some were even predicting we wouldn't lose a game. Now it looks like we'll be 8-8 with maybe a chance to limp into the playoffs.
People will say injuries are part of the game. Yup, and injuries seem to be the only part of the game we excel at. And injuries will be one of the biggest reasons we go nowhere this year.
P-A-N-I-C!
The past two weeks, the team has played the kind of offense they need to play - both type and quality. If the D just gets back to near what it was before last week, the team will be way better than all right. I still say, everything is within reach - division championship, go to and win the Super Bowl.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
We here at Banjo's Inc. are sticklers for legacy. Chances of a change this season are minimal.
You could say we are stubborn.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
With only one other HB on the roster that is not on IR I don't think we can afford to let Starks walk right now.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostStarks has looked no better than Knile or Action Jackson. He has had a real rough season. Maybe, just maybe, he was dealing with a nagging injury all along. He certainly didn't have his old burst.
I wish the Packers would cut Starks, but maybe they have reason to believe he can rebound.
Comment
-
Blown coverage on Sanu's TD.
No one would identify who was responsible for giving up the game-winning touchdown pass the Falcons’ Matt Ryan threw to Mohamed Sanu with 31 seconds left in the game.
McCarthy said he wasn’t going to blame it on a single player, but admitted a mistake was made.
“There’s adjustments in each and every coverage and in particular on alignments and so forth,” McCarthy said. “I’ve never corrected players here in the media. We looked at this morning. We’ll go through it thoroughly.”
Defensive coordinator Dom Capers described it as a zone coverage and also wouldn’t identify what went wrong. He did not say he regretted the call, which left linebacker Jake Ryan trying to cover Sanu.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment

Comment