Originally posted by red
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will Eddie Lacy Be On Packer Roster in 2017?
Collapse
X
-
I completely agree...which is why I don't think there is much chance of Lacy returning to Green Bay. It isn't that Green Bay wouldn't take him back...it is that Lacy probably has had enough of the Packers and is looking to move on to a team that will feature him 20-25 times a game. You have to think some other NFL team will be willing to do that.It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!
-
I feel the need for speed; I want Michaels or a burner draft picks as one of the RB's
Everybody noted Lacy for a bargain. What are we willing to pay ? 1 Year 5 MIL ? More ?
Put me I the who cares category for EddieTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
I never said he would. I said if he changed his ways it's worth a look. Obviously no guarantee he won't get huge again.Originally posted by red View Posthe didn't last year going into a contract year, and he has not been able to work out for awhile now. why do you think he would get in shape this year?C.H.U.D.
Comment
-
Whatever weight he was at this year was fine as he seemed to be in shape. That's all he needs.
If he wants a long career, then he needs to slim down. But I am only concerned about next two years with a new deal.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Clearly you don't care about these players as human beings, like I do.Originally posted by pbmax View PostWhatever weight he was at this year was fine as he seemed to be in shape. That's all he needs.
If he wants a long career, then he needs to slim down. But I am only concerned about next two years with a new deal."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
Obviously Lacy brings some things Monty doesn't, but he doesn't draw people off their assignment and open up man coverage like this:Originally posted by vince View Post
One DB bounced off him like he was a brick wall, then he carried 2 others for 15 yards to finish that run - plus a DE and a LB.
WHY TY MONTGOMERY SHOULD GET 20-PLUS CARRIES PER GAME
Montgomery blossoming into a star as a running back
In Week 15, Packers RB Ty Montgomery led all running backs (min. 12 carries) in yards after contact per attempt, elusive rating, and breakaway percentage.
Next year, change his number to 38 and he's a game changer. I do like the idea of pairing him with Lacy and Michael though, but in my mind, Monty's the feature guy with everything he can do. If he can stay healthy the sky's the limit. What a natural. No one can open things up downfield like he can as a double threat.
Comment
-
Absolutely. This offense NEEDS a dynamic receiving threat out of the backfield. Lacy is not that kind of player.Originally posted by vince View PostObviously Lacy brings some things Monty doesn't, but he doesn't draw people off their assignment and open up man coverage like thisIt's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!
Comment
-
I like having Monty in the backfield. He can swing out to WR without substitution and it really fucks with the opposing defense. It basically got us a free first down late in the game tonight, because the Leos tried to sub and got caught with 12-men participation. Cobb did it a few times, but Monty is much better in the backfield, and about as good at WR if 2016 is to be believed.
Comment
-
I have been clamoring for a Shane Vereen type guy for years. Monty is a bigger Shane Vereen. Remember how NE used to pass to him to set everything up in their quick pass offense? That dink-and-dunk attack could be equivalent in Green Bay.
Monty is 225 which is thick but he is also hella tall for an RB at 6'2". Something to keep in mind.
Comment



Comment