Do Montgomery/Michael make Lacy expendable? This is also a strong draft for running backs. I know Lacy is a talented guy, but maybe the Packers will want to move on with guys whose weight and conditioning isn't an issue.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will Eddie Lacy Be On Packer Roster in 2017?
Collapse
X
-
they drop his price tag as far as GB is concernedOriginally posted by Joemailman View PostDo Montgomery/Michael make Lacy expendable? This is also a strong draft for running backs. I know Lacy is a talented guy, but maybe the Packers will want to move on with guys whose weight and conditioning isn't an issue.
Comment
-
Lacy probably, Starks for sure - somebody will almost certainly offer Lacy way more than he's worth.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostDo Montgomery/Michael make Lacy expendable? This is also a strong draft for running backs. I know Lacy is a talented guy, but maybe the Packers will want to move on with guys whose weight and conditioning isn't an issue.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
I think Lacy signs a Nick Perry style 1 year "show me" contract for 5-6. Hopefully the Packers still draft a RB. If not at least a TE early. Give AR a couple guys who can actually get open consistently.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
I could see this.Originally posted by Zool View PostI think Lacy signs a Nick Perry style 1 year "show me" contract for 5-6. Hopefully the Packers still draft a RB. If not at least a TE early. Give AR a couple guys who can actually get open consistently.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
What an interesting conundrum for the Packers. You always want talent, and Lacy is undoubtedly talented. Unfortunately, there are two problems: one, in a contract year the guy was, yes, in better shape than before, but a 270 pound guy who loses thirty pounds is still about fifteen pounds overweight. If you can't get in top-notch shape in a contract year, what are you going to do if you have a three year contract? Hmm. Secondly, how would MM configure the offense with Lacy back? Lacy seems to do better with more and more carries, but we've seen McCarthy transform this offense so that, once again, it revolves around the arm of A. Rodgers. Can you keep this offense in its current configuration with Lacy as your featured back?"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
That's the whole point. Ty Montgomery is now the feature back. McCarthy basically said as much yesterday, and that will only be further enhanced once he actually gets to see all of the game film. Imagine what Ty could look like with an entire offseason to actually work with the OL and coaching staff to work on being a RB. We finally have a RB who can be a dynamic receiving threat out of the backfield.Originally posted by Fritz View PostCan you keep this offense in its current configuration with Lacy as your featured back?
Since Lacy at best only has a chance at competing for the feature back spot in GB. I'm fairly certain that there is at least one NFL team willing to offer him $5M+/year to be their primary back. He's shown enough during his career to justify another chance somewhere. I just don't see how everyone else in the league is going to completely pass on the guy so that the Packers can retain him at a discount bin price for 1 season.It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!
Comment
-
I could see the Lions making a run at Lacy. They think they're close, with Stafford playing as well as he has, and if you can get someone like Lacy at a decent price, then suddenly you have a running game, and you didn't have to use a draft pick. Hell, the Giants could use him, too."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment


Comment