Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some random thoughts about the team moving forward

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Bring black McKenzie!!

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Zool View Post
      He's so rarely in position to break up a pass. My issue with him is lack of big plays. He's serviceable, but you want to do better than him.
      I suspect he is better than many players who fill similar roles on other teams.

      Comment


      • #48
        What big name RB will we disappointed we don't get? AP? Jamaal Charles?
        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Zool View Post
          He's so rarely in position to break up a pass. My issue with him is lack of big plays. He's serviceable, but you want to do better than him.
          He has 18 passes defended so far. Will Blackmon was with us for something like 4 years with zero if I recall correctly.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
            He has 18 passes defended so far. Will Blackmon was with us for something like 4 years with zero if I recall correctly.
            Must be a perception thing for me. I'm tired of watching the Packers D give up 9 on 3rd and 8. A large majority of the time it's to a TE, and that's usually the guy covered by Hyde. I want to start seeing them get more negative plays on 3rd down.
            Originally posted by 3irty1
            This is museum quality stupidity.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Zool View Post
              Must be a perception thing for me. I'm tired of watching the Packers D give up 9 on 3rd and 8. A large majority of the time it's to a TE, and that's usually the guy covered by Hyde. I want to start seeing them get more negative plays on 3rd down.
              I'm right there with you. Most of the time he just seems a step too late to break up a pass or get a turnover. It's definitely better than being completely out of position. But it just feels like the position could be upgraded, especially with how many teams utilize TE's.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by StPaulPackFan View Post
                I'm right there with you. Most of the time he just seems a step too late to break up a pass or get a turnover. It's definitely better than being completely out of position. But it just feels like the position could be upgraded, especially with how many teams utilize TE's.
                I think he is supposed to be the dime CB at best and for a part of the season he was #2.

                He is supposed to be that 5th CB/safety and special teams player. Injuries have killed the team this year.
                But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                -Tim Harmston

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                  I think he is supposed to be the dime CB at best and for a part of the season he was #2.

                  He is supposed to be that 5th CB/safety and special teams player. Injuries have killed the team this year.
                  Yup. When you peel away 2 or 3 layers from the top of the depth chart like the Packers did at CB for the mid part of the season, #s 4,5 and 6 don't look so good. There are reasons those guys don't have starting positions in the league. I suppose the Packers could have paid House and Hayward the last two years, and had starting calibre players 4 and 5 layers deep at CB, but from a salary cap perspective it doesn't make a lot of sense.

                  I still think the Packers had exceptional depth at CB this year, not because all had top level starting ability, but because the players at the lower levels of the depth chart were a heck of a lot better than what most teams have at #4, 5 or 6.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                    What big name RB will we disappointed we don't get? AP? Jamaal Charles?
                    Looking Back getting Forte for what the Jets signed him for would have been a great move

                    If TT's our GM I think we all understand we won't get a big name
                    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                      Looking Back getting Forte for what the Jets signed him for would have been a great move

                      If TT's our GM I think we all understand we won't get a big name
                      smh

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Cobb is so overpaid.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Patler View Post
                          Yup. When you peel away 2 or 3 layers from the top of the depth chart like the Packers did at CB for the mid part of the season, #s 4,5 and 6 don't look so good. There are reasons those guys don't have starting positions in the league. I suppose the Packers could have paid House and Hayward the last two years, and had starting calibre players 4 and 5 layers deep at CB, but from a salary cap perspective it doesn't make a lot of sense.

                          I still think the Packers had exceptional depth at CB this year, not because all had top level starting ability, but because the players at the lower levels of the depth chart were a heck of a lot better than what most teams have at #4, 5 or 6.
                          Agreed. No team has starting caliber talent that deep at any position. Had Sheilds not been lost for the season and Randall hurt for long stretches (along with Rollins missing a couple of games) nobody here would be talking about House or Hayward.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                            Looking Back getting Forte for what the Jets signed him for would have been a great move

                            If TT's our GM I think we all understand we won't get a big name
                            I don't know if a RB with a 3.7 average per carry would have been the answer to our running game. I do think it was a mistake to go into the season with only Lacy and Starks at HB. Losing Crockett didn't help. Let's hope Micheal will make a difference going forward.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                              Cobb is so overpaid.
                              Would Cobb had been paid like this by another team when he was about to be a FA in 2015? Nobody balked back when he signed that contract. I think he is playing pretty well right now.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                                Would Cobb had been paid like this by another team when he was about to be a FA in 2015? Nobody balked back when he signed that contract. I think he is playing pretty well right now.
                                Actually I recall there was some debate as to whether top money should be paid to a slot receiver. In terms of average salary, Cobb is 15th among WR's. http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/rankings/...wide-receiver/ At the time of the signing, his pay was probably high than 15th. Cobb is currently 50th in the NFL in receiving yards. 3rd on the team. I think a strong argument can be made that he's a good, but overpaid player.
                                I can't run no more
                                With that lawless crowd
                                While the killers in high places
                                Say their prayers out loud
                                But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                                A thundercloud
                                They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X