Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers' Off Season Moves and 2017 Roster
Collapse
X
-
Bad idea as you would be weakening two positions on the line. Lang is a better guard than Bulaga, Spriggs is not a better RT than Bulaga (at least at this stage). If they lose Lang I would rather they try a greenhorn like Lucas Patrick who apparently they like at guard and keep Bulaga at RT. Perhaps Patrick can hold his own like Taylor did. If not, they can always fall back to Don "I blow" Barclay or start juggling.Originally posted by Pugger View PostWell, the thinking at 1265 might be to move Bulaga inside and put Spriggs at RT. That might not be a bad idea if somebody offers Lang a ton a money.
Comment
-
I was just going off information that was out there a few days ago that said Peppers wants to play again this year, but that likely won't be with the Packers. That's why a 30 year old Connor Barwin would make sense. I'm not saying he's the second coming of Peppers, but he'd be that veteran presence to work with Clay and Nick to generate pressure. In a 3-4, the LB's are supposed to be the stars.Originally posted by Fritz View PostOkay, so Peppers wants to play but the Packers have said thanks but no thanks? Is that what I'm getting from Carolina's post?"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Comment
-
This seems like some of the smartest dollars one could spend in FA right now if you plan on running a 3-4. I imagine his price will be a bit lower than Perry's but with a little more guaranteed.Originally posted by pbmax View PostPacker Report
Hearing Barwin has some options. GB among them.
The NY Giants have proven the "mullet" approach to defense-building. Get yourself sorted out up front and leave it trash in the back.70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.
Comment
-
then we have zero depth on the lineOriginally posted by Pugger View PostWell, the thinking at 1265 might be to move Bulaga inside and put Spriggs at RT. That might not be a bad idea if somebody offers Lang a ton a money.
and no, barclay doesn't count, he shouldn't be in the nfl, much less on the packers
and you know someone or some two or three guys are gonna be lost for the season on that line
Comment
-
its a fake numberOriginally posted by pbmax View Post@TomSilverstein 21m21 minutes ago
#Packers CB Micah Hyde’s deal is worth $30.5 million over 5 years. Way more than GB was willing to pay. Probably could have had him for $5M.
GOOD FOR MICAH, BUT WTF?

Ian RapoportVerified account
@RapSheet
The #Bills are giving Micah Hyde $30M over 5 years, source said. $32.5M max. $14M guaranteed
its 8 million guaranteed in a signing bonus. then they went ahead and said the first two years are guaranteed because, duh, they just gave him an 8 million dollar signing bonus. base salaries on 2.3 and 3.7 the first 2 years
= 14 million "guaranteed"
they can actually dump him after 2017 and not take a negative cap hit
Comment
-
It could mean he's going to give the Packers a chance to match whatever offer he gets elsewhere. Is that bad?Originally posted by red View Posti really don't like the idea that lacy is spending today and part of tomorrow with the seahawks, then the rest of tomorrow and sunday with the queens before coming to green bayI can't run no more with that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
thats one way to look at it, the other is that he's giving other teams every chance in the world to sign him away from green bay.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostIt could mean he's going to give the Packers a chance to match whatever offer he gets elsewhere. Is that bad?
if he's just trying to get a number to show the packers, then why is he spending multiple days with other teams?
or the team could have given him a deal before our rivals dictated his value to us
Comment
-


Comment