Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers' Off Season Moves and 2017 Roster

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by wist43 View Post
    What was I thinking... Dom is da man, lol

    All those dismal numbers and embarrassing performances are on Ted... wait, what??? I'm so confused...

    Which is it??
    Do you think the packers are a dismal and embarrassing team?
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by wist43 View Post
      What was I thinking... Dom is da man, lol

      All those dismal numbers and embarrassing performances are on Ted... wait, what??? I'm so confused...

      Which is it??
      All I'm saying is everyone here knows your opinion on the matter. That dead horse ain't getting any deader. Maybe add something new?
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      This is museum quality stupidity.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
        Do you think the packers are a dismal and embarrassing team?
        No, of course not; however, the organization has a tremendous blindspot which rises to the level of being a fundamental flaw - and that is related to all things defense.

        TT is ultimately responsible b/c he is the one that needs to fire Capers.

        During a press conference year before, or last, Eliot Wolf admitted that the Packers don't value the ILB position very much - and that of course is born out in how they procure players for the position, and how perpetually weak we are in the middle of our defense. As I said, TT is ultimately responsible, but it is Capers who cares nothing about controlling the middle of the field; hence, his addiction to running that abominable 2-4 year in and year out, play in and play out.

        Capers has fielded some of the worst defenses in NFL history during his time in Green Bay... yet he's still here.

        No, the organization isn't an embarrassment - but Capers surely is.
        wist

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Zool View Post
          All I'm saying is everyone here knows your opinion on the matter. That dead horse ain't getting any deader. Maybe add something new?
          We're all stuck in the same ruts... including you, Ted, and Dom.

          It is Ted who refuses to fire Capers, and it is Capers who keeps running that same piece of shit scheme, and it is the organization that keeps misjudging players - mainly b/c of Dom's input I'd guess - and the beat goes on.

          Nothing is going to change - b/c the Packers have changed nothing. It isn't me... It's Ted's refusal to call a spade a spade, and send Capers off into retirement.

          We have a puncher's chance b/c we have the QB - but for all intents and purposes, we're sunk before the opening kickoff of the season b/c of Capers.
          wist

          Comment


          • Originally posted by wist43 View Post
            We're all stuck in the same ruts... including you, Ted, and Dom.

            It is Ted who refuses to fire Capers, and it is Capers who keeps running that same piece of shit scheme, and it is the organization that keeps misjudging players - mainly b/c of Dom's input I'd guess - and the beat goes on.

            Nothing is going to change - b/c the Packers have changed nothing. It isn't me... It's Ted's refusal to call a spade a spade, and send Capers off into retirement.

            We have a puncher's chance b/c we have the QB - but for all intents and purposes, we're sunk before the opening kickoff of the season b/c of Capers.
            And the beat goes on.
            Originally posted by 3irty1
            This is museum quality stupidity.

            Comment


            • Given the personnel that Ted has provided us, that "same piece of shit scheme" put forth by Capers is the only thing keeping the Packers D from being "dismal and embarrassing".
              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                Field Yates‏ @FieldYates 31m31 minutes ago
                Source: after visiting the team today, RB Christine Michael has re-signed with the Packers.
                Tom Silverstein‏ @TomSilverstein 2h2 hours ago
                #Packers gave RB Christine Michael a one-year, $800,000 deal that included $25,000 signing bonus. Veteran salary benefit, so cap # is $640K.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                  Given the personnel that Ted has provided us, that "same piece of shit scheme" put forth by Capers is the only thing keeping the Packers D from being "dismal and embarrassing".
                  So you should be on the Fire TT Bandwagon, then - no??

                  Because one thing is for sure and for certain - Green Bay's defense sucks, and has sucked for many years.

                  The one year we actually had a decent shot was the year MM/Dom wilted under the pressure in Seattle.

                  25 years of HOF QB's, and only 2 titles?? Sorry, but I expect more.
                  wist

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Zool View Post
                    And the beat goes on.
                    We're just the Cleveland Browns with a better QB.....

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                      We're just the Cleveland Browns with a better QB.....
                      Not too far off...

                      Rodgers goes down and we stumble to a 2-5-1 record; Brady is suspended for the Pats, and they go 3-1 and look good doing it.

                      Without Rodgers, the Packers are very much a sub .500 team.
                      wist

                      Comment


                      • To be fair, some years the Browns are actually a reasonable roster *sans* the QB. Think Brady couldn't win 10 or 11 games with the 2014 Browns? I bet he could. Rodgers, too.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                          Not too far off...

                          Rodgers goes down and we stumble to a 2-5-1 record; Brady is suspended for the Pats, and they go 3-1 and look good doing it.

                          Without Rodgers, the Packers are very much a sub .500 team.
                          Spot on, and I have been saying it for a long time as well. Rodgers makes TT and stubby look great, not anything they do on their own. Sure TT drafted Rodgers, but every draft pick has a degree of luck involved, be it good luck or bad.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                            To be fair, some years the Browns are actually a reasonable roster *sans* the QB. Think Brady couldn't win 10 or 11 games with the 2014 Browns? I bet he could. Rodgers, too.
                            No way Brady wins 10 games with the 2016 browns. 2014 for sure, had a decent defence and run game.
                            All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

                            George Orwell

                            Comment


                            • Just saying, the 2014 Browns were sub-500, but were a good QB away from a playoff team and possible SB contender (considering they play in the AFC).

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                                Not too far off...

                                Rodgers goes down and we stumble to a 2-5-1 record; Brady is suspended for the Pats, and they go 3-1 and look good doing it.

                                Without Rodgers, the Packers are very much a sub .500 team.
                                Roster composition or backup QB issue?

                                More impressed by NE year with Cassel as starter than last year's 3-1. Cassel could not hold another starting QB job.
                                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X