PackerRats Glossary

[mraynrand]

No, the answer and suggest way gets everyone involved.

Otherwise the list of 42 I came up with earlier today while avoiding work is going to ruin everyone else's fun.

alright alright alright. have to address the one on the table then suggest next. But no harm in suggesting out of the blue I think. It may be a while before more people return from off season haitus, if ever.

You came up with 42? Even Tank couldn't come up with 42 'Ted Trapped in the Closet' poems.

'Packer People' could be one

[Harlan Huckleby]

Next up: "Patlerized."

To patlerize is to pbmax someone.

I suggest FMUTA! as an expression of exasperation.

The existing canon:

[RashanGary]

"Patlerized." Being proved false by facts and data. "You've just been Patlerized" means that someone proved you wrong in a way that leaves you little to no room to save face.


Next up...... the Bretsky Curse

[RashanGary]

I can't edit my post right now but patlerizing needs to be done by Patler.....

[pbmax]

alright alright alright. have to address the one on the table then suggest next. But no harm in suggesting out of the blue I think. It may be a while before more people return from off season haitus, if ever.

You came up with 42? Even Tank couldn't come up with 42 'Ted Trapped in the Closet' poems.

'Packer People' could be one

Thanks. To be fair, 8 of the 42 are variations of things Ted doesn't care about.

[pbmax]

"Patlerized." Being proved false by facts and data. "You've just been Patlerized" means that someone proved you wrong in a way that leaves you little to no room to save face.


Next up...... the Bretsky Curse

Nicely put. You can be Patlerized by someone other than Patler, but the odds are its going to be Patler. I think he would be OK with this definition. Though I bet he would want logic and clear thought to get a shout out.


So next up is Bretsky Curse!

[mraynrand]

I can't edit my post right now but patlerizing needs to be done by Patler.....

Yeah, and your definition was OK, but lacking in depth. Being Patlerized by Patler means having your position dissected down to the last, seemingly trivial detail. Each incorrect assertion, assumption, claim, hint, suggestion is individually addressed and refuted, typically with multiple sources, all linked. Every argument is described and deconstructed and every false or incomplete point is laid bare, like an open wound, painfully visible for all of the packerrats forum to see. Most often, one must look away, for to hold your gaze on the dismembered, disemboweled, twisted wreck of a destroyed posting is to be suddenly and violently ill. Being Patlerized is like being stalked by a terminator; coldly, mercilessly and relentlessly will Patler pursue you and your weak or fraudulent argument. He will post, then re-post, the rebut, then re-rebut.. He doesn't get tired, he doesn't feel remorse, and he doesn't quit until your arguments are dead.

[swede]

Nicely put. You can be Patlerized by someone other than Patler, but the odds are its going to be Patler. I think he would be OK with this definition. Though I bet he would want logic and clear thought to get a shout out.


So next up is Bretsky Curse!

A Bretsky curse, of course, is an enthusiastic endorsement of a player who subsequently fails. Its exact etymology, origins and archetypical examples I leave to others, but its usage demurs and hedges one's own enthusiasm for unproven players, as in "I don't want to put a Bretsky curse on the guy but this kid Bostick has great instincts and is gonna be remembered here down the road".

[pbmax]

Yeah, and your definition was OK, but lacking in depth. Being Patlerized by Patler means having your position dissected down to the last, seemingly trivial detail. Each incorrect assertion, assumption, claim, hint, suggestion is individually addressed and refuted, typically with multiple sources, all linked. Every argument is described and deconstructed and every false or incomplete point is laid bare, like an open wound, painfully visible for all of the packerrats forum to see. Most often, one must look away, for to hold your gaze on the dismembered, disemboweled, twisted wreck of a destroyed posting is to be suddenly and violently ill. Being Patlerized is like being stalked by a terminator; coldly, mercilessly and relentlessly will Patler pursue you and your weak or fraudulent argument. He will post, then re-post, the rebut, then re-rebut.. He doesn't get tired, he doesn't feel remorse, and he doesn't quit until your arguments are dead.

Where is the part where his lifeless black eyes roll over white when he attacks?

[pbmax]

A Bretsky curse, of course, is an enthusiastic endorsement of a player who subsequently fails. Its exact etymology, origins and archetypical examples I leave to others, but its usage demurs and hedges one's own enthusiasm for unproven players, as in "I don't want to put a Bretsky curse on the guy but this kid Bostick has great instincts and is gonna be remembered here down the road".

Next after topic after swede boxed up the Bretsky Curse:

bobblehead's suggestion of Fuckdoggle

[Joemailman]

Next after topic after swede boxed up the Bretsky Curse:

bobblehead's suggestion of Fuckdoggle

Fuckdoggle is a player who comes into the league with little or no acclaim and against all odds make the roster and then contributes in games. The ultimate Fuckdoggle would be an undrafted white wide receiver, although variations are allowed.

Next Up: Koolaid Drinker.

[smuggler]

BFD... Big Fucking Deal, or... BARNEY FUCKDOGGLE

[Upnorth]

Fuckdoggle is a player who comes into the league with little or no acclaim and against all odds make the roster and then contributes in games. The ultimate Fuckdoggle would be an undrafted white wide receiver, although variations are allowed.

Next Up: Koolaid Drinker.

Koolaid Drinker: Anyone who suggests that TT or MM or DC or some combination of the 3 are not personnally responsible for every loss or for Arron Rodgers not having 8 sb wins so far.

Next up: Fire Slocum (unless my answer is deemed incorrect)

[mraynrand]

Koolaid Drinker: Anyone who suggests that TT or MM or DC or some combination of the 3 are not personnally responsible for every loss or for Arron Rodgers not having 8 sb wins so far.

Next up: Fire Slocum (unless my answer is deemed incorrect)

LOL. You are correct, Sir!

[RashanGary]

Would be nice to update the first post to include all of this great info. New people might actually use it