Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obligatory Official Game Day Thread - Final Exhibition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Boy, this thread was about as inspiring as being at the game last night knowing that none of the starters I wanted to see would play.
    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

    -Tim Harmston

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
      You've all missed out on the most important question coming out of tonight's game:

      Does Fritz have to carry the mantel of starting next week's regular-season-opener game thread, since I began this one and the Packers won? Or do exhibition games not count?
      You should do it.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #78
        Okay.
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
          You should do it.
          yup. can't break the mojo.

          Comment


          • #80
            I don't know how much mojo a meangingless exhibition win carries, but we'll find out.

            It should be a good match-up. I just would love to see the Pack sack Wilson good a few times. Oh, and win the game.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
              I see a lot of Ezekiel Elliott in Aaron Jones. Just needs great run blocking.
              That's not as ridiculous as you might think.
              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                That's not as ridiculous as you might think.
                Your response is not as surprising as you think.

                Comment


                • #83
                  I can agree that Hundley has shown nothing to prove that he will NOT be a later blooming Dak Prescott.

                  It's just that Prescott is a phenom, 1 in 100 of QBs entering the NFL.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                    I can agree that Hundley has shown nothing to prove that he will NOT be a later blooming Dak Prescott.

                    It's just that Prescott is a phenom, 1 in 100 of QBs entering the NFL.
                    I see Prescott every week. Yeah, he's damn good, but he made rookie mistakes and he shows a bit of inaccuracy at times, same as Hundley. He didn't have that annoying tendency to get sacked, but of course, he virtually never had anywhere near the pass rush Packer QBs have to live with.
                    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Hundley was weak in his mechanics. Very inaccurate with a tendency to be wild high. Any team looking at his tape has to think there are guys on their own roster are as capable as Brett H. He's still a solid prospect, but has a ton of work to do.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X