Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Banjo: Week 2 @ Atlanta

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post

    Lane Taylor has been as good as Sitton, even though he was a journeyman who came out of nowhere and is nothing special for talent or athleticism.
    Lane Taylor is not a journeyman who came out of nowhere. He was drafted by the Packers in 2013 and has developed nicely the past 3 seasons. Just sayin'.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by QBME View Post
      Lane Taylor is not a journeyman who came out of nowhere. He was drafted by the Packers in 2013 and has developed nicely the past 3 seasons. Just sayin'.
      Maybe Tex thought about the classical definition of journeyman; "a skilled worker who has successfully completed an official apprenticeship qualification in a building trade or craft".

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
        http://www.jsonline.com/story/sports...ons/678417001/

        Eric Baranczyk saw it like me. I don't study the NFL, but my eyeballs yesterday said the Atlanta receivers are quick, good route runners.
        He's big and he is a good route runner with decent hands.

        His average value for 6 years in the League is 26. Cobb had 38 in four years and stands at 52 for six. Davante Adams is 19 after 3.

        As red would say, the Packers are allergic to covering inside routes unless its Burnett or Hyde.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
          Care to expand this thought a bit?
          It might only be my imagination, but it seems like there is a WR pecking order this year that hurts Adams and is hurting the offense. There are always proven players, favorites and less established players, but this year, Adams seems to have gone to the back of the line again.

          Adams has had some long droughts without targets. And we have seen a focus on Nelson, Cobb and Bennett. Heck, compared to snaps, Allison gets more targets each time he steps out onto the field. There might be something going on, but Adams has proven he can carry the load and make big plays.

          Cobb has been effective, but except for one TD on the free play, Nelson and Bennett have had more limited success.

          This is a roundabout way of saying throw more often to Adams. Of course, its only been 2 games.
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by pbmax View Post
            His average value for 6 years in the League is 26.
            Please don't tell me this "average value" is some fantasy football thing. Say it ain't so.

            I find opinions of what is seen on the field more interesting. Not that all opinions are equally well based. Things change year-to-year, and an observer can account for whether a player's productivity is due to his individual skill or team factors.

            Comment


            • #81
              dp

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                Please don't tell me this "average value" is some fantasy football thing. Say it ain't so.

                I find opinions of what is seen on the field more interesting. Not that all opinions are equally well based. Things change year-to-year, and an observer can account for whether a player's productivity is due to his individual skill or team factors.
                I think most people saw what Packer coaches saw: that their starting dbs were not up to the task. That's why they pulled Rollins and Randall for King. Given the fact that R&R were so bad they had to be pulled, and House was slow, it seems fruitless to make WR comparisons based on this game alone.

                You don't need fantasy scores to know that R&R have been questionable going back. Last year they had injuries as excuse, this year....?
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                  I think most people saw what Packer coaches saw: that their starting dbs were not up to the task. That's why they pulled Rollins and Randall for King. Given the fact that R&R were so bad they had to be pulled, and House was slow, it seems fruitless to make WR comparisons based on this game alone.

                  You don't need fantasy scores to know that R&R have been questionable going back. Last year they had injuries as excuse, this year....?
                  This year mental errors and technique issues. Totally things R&R should have down by now.

                  But I'm not going to run them off yet. Neither is Grabby McSmurf bad, so give them another year of development (safety to corner and basketball to football).
                  No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    I need to find a new football guru. I will follow Woody for a while, see how that goes.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                      I need to find a new football guru. I will follow Woody for a while, see how that goes.
                      It's like you're tempting me to take a shot at him. Or you. Or both.
                      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                        I have been supportive of Dom Capers over the years, but I wonder if we have any chance of ever beating the Falcons with him as the defensive coordinator.

                        The Bears only lost by 6 points to the Falcons. We haven't even shown a glimmer of hope in the last 3 games with the Falcons.

                        Of course, the offense hasn't looked much better either. They have now managed just 7 points in the first halves of the last two games.
                        For a fair argument, assess our D against chicago's in that debate. Eliminate defensive scores. Look at the whole picture. If we get 2 calls to be no calls and Rodgers doesn't do a 360 Favresque Pick you are thinking we lost a real tough tight game.
                        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                          Maybe somebody more expert than me can do this. If you combined Green Bay and Atlanta's WRs, what would be pecking order for top five?
                          Julio Jones, Jordy Nelson....everyone else. But Julio is near god like....and he is playing against our cbs
                          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                            I need to find a new football guru. I will follow Woody for a while, see how that goes.
                            Can I suggest Rutnstrut instead? His posting volume is smaller and will leave you more time to ruminate.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                              Please don't tell me this "average value" is some fantasy football thing. Say it ain't so.

                              I find opinions of what is seen on the field more interesting. Not that all opinions are equally well based. Things change year-to-year, and an observer can account for whether a player's productivity is due to his individual skill or team factors.
                              Come on you sleepy mutt, time to emerge from your kennel and enter into the 21st century. Value is DVOA, a football outsiders advanced stat (Defense-adjusted Value over average?), the football equivalent of baseball's WAR.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by hoosier View Post
                                Come on you sleepy mutt, time to emerge from your kennel and enter into the 21st century. Value is DVOA, a football outsiders advanced stat (Defense-adjusted Value over average?), the football equivalent of baseball's WAR.
                                WAR, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing!
                                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X