Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aaron Rodgers

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 11
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 template Next
  • #91
    Originally posted by pbmax View Post
    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...h-key-decision

    This article starts with things no one said to Rapoport. But then he gets to the nub of the argument:



    So its not 100% and had no chance of being 100%. Is it 80%? RapSheet doesn't know. So you are left with two choices, McKenzie is consuming with specialist to see if its truly above 80 everywhere OR the debate about 79-81% is being done at the front office level.

    My bet is on the former.
    the plates will make the bone stronger then it was. with 2 plates it could be stronger even if the bone is still completely broken

    the concern might be other plate failure, and what would happen to the not healed bone if a plate fails

    Comment

    • #92
      Originally posted by red View Post
      the plates will make the bone stronger then it was. with 2 plates it could be stronger even if the bone is still completely broken

      the concern might be other plate failure, and what would happen to the not healed bone if a plate fails
      If it makes it stronger than it was, there has to be a new weak point. The plates may not fail, but something can.

      Comment

      • #93
        Originally posted by pbmax View Post
        http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...h-key-decision

        This article starts with things no one said to Rapoport. But then he gets to the nub of the argument:

        So its not 100% and had no chance of being 100%. Is it 80%? RapSheet doesn't know. So you are left with two choices, McKenzie is consuming with specialist to see if its truly above 80 everywhere OR the debate about 79-81% is being done at the front office level.

        My bet is on the former.
        I assumed it was that in combination with M3 wanting to delay any announcement for as long as he could possibly get away with it.
        When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

        Comment

        • #94
          It makes ZERO sense to me to play Aaron Rodgers again if he's just 80-81 % healed.

          Just let this Season play out and allow 100% healing.

          That's just my thinking and my IQ and Life is simply about common sense.

          The Green Bay Packers are just frankly not a good Football team this year and the NFC is loaded with good football teams.

          Why risk Aaron Rodgers for any short term and improbable chance and Playoffs or about 40%; and after that, a miserable one and done once in the Playoffs.

          My prediction based on common sense:

          Aaron Rodgers is done this Season           and there are too many other reasons the Green Bay Packers want it just that way.

          Everyone back next Season for another 'Brand New Fresh Start'.
          Last edited by woodbuck27; 12-12-2017, 04:01 PM.
          ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
          ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
          ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
          ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

          Comment

          • #95
            I've not read this to this point in time or before this post:

            Packers, Aaron Rodgers at crossroads with key decision
            http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000892088/article/packers-aaron-rodgers-at-crossroads-with-key-decision
            A day after Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers underwent the all-important first CT scan to determine how his fractured collarbone is healing, there is still no word on his status.


            Packers, Aaron Rodgers at crossroads with key decision

            By: Ian Rapoport ... NFL Network Insider

            Published: Dec. 12, 2017 at 11:39 a.m. Updated: Dec. 12, 2017 at 04:34 p.m.
            ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
            ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
            ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
            ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

            Comment

            • #96
              Originally posted by woodbuck27 View Post
              The Green Bay Packers are just frankly not a good Football team this year and the NFC is loaded with good football teams.

              Why risk Aaron Rodgers for any short term and improbable chance and Playoffs or about 40%; and after that, a miserable one and done once in the Playoffs.

              Comment

              • #97
                Bringing him back really makes no sense. This team is pathetically terrible, they aren't a championship team.

                Comment

                • #98
                  Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                  Bringing him back really makes no sense. This team is pathetically terrible, they aren't a championship team.
                  It's hard to take this seriously. Packers were 4-1 with Rodgers. They nearly beat Pittsburgh without him. I get the accumulated injury deal, but that's a problem for everyone. Just ask Philly. You never know what's going to happen. Maybe with Rodgers back, and with a two-headed running game, the Packers could dominate TOP against other teams and protect their defensive-back depleted defense and be totally competitive. If Rodgers is healthy, who knows - maybe he gets as blistering hot as in 2010 and they run a team off the field when they weren't supposed to and it propels them to Championship. Careers are limited, you never want to miss an opportunity, no matter how improbable.
                  "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                  Comment

                  • #99
                    Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                    It's hard to take this seriously. Packers were 4-1 with Rodgers. They nearly beat Pittsburgh without him. I get the accumulated injury deal, but that's a problem for everyone. Just ask Philly. You never know what's going to happen. Maybe with Rodgers back, and with a two-headed running game, the Packers could dominate TOP against other teams and protect their defensive-back depleted defense and be totally competitive. If Rodgers is healthy, who knows - maybe he gets as blistering hot as in 2010 and they run a team off the field when they weren't supposed to and it propels them to Championship. Careers are limited, you never want to miss an opportunity, no matter how improbable.
                    I think if Rodgers had not gotten hurt, they would be 10-3 right now and right in the hunt for best record in the NFC. The cornerback situation would be an issue, but they would be a team others couldn't take lightly.
                    I can't run no more
                    With that lawless crowd
                    While the killers in high places
                    Say their prayers out loud
                    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                    A thundercloud
                    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                    Comment

                    • #100
                      Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                      It's hard to take this seriously. Packers were 4-1 with Rodgers. They nearly beat Pittsburgh without him. I get the accumulated injury deal, but that's a problem for everyone. Just ask Philly. You never know what's going to happen. Maybe with Rodgers back, and with a two-headed running game, the Packers could dominate TOP against other teams and protect their defensive-back depleted defense and be totally competitive. If Rodgers is healthy, who knows - maybe he gets as blistering hot as in 2010 and they run a team off the field when they weren't supposed to and it propels them to Championship. Careers are limited, you never want to miss an opportunity, no matter how improbable.
                      This is important. One thing the Rodgers-less offense has done is found that they have a couple of great young RBs, at least one of whom can catch.
                      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                      Comment

                      • #101
                        Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                        I think if Rodgers had not gotten hurt, they would be 10-3 right now and right in the hunt for best record in the NFC. The cornerback situation would be an issue, but they would be a team others couldn't take lightly.
                        I had them at 10-3 as well. Losses at ATL, MN, Pittsburgh. Figured they lose at Carolina and win MN and at Det.

                        Maybe they would even be 11-2 because of Pitt, but unsure.

                        Still, why the hell give up now? At least wait until after Carolina...
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment

                        • #102
                          Originally posted by denverYooper View Post
                          This is important. One thing the Rodgers-less offense has done is found that they have a couple of great young RBs, at least one of whom can catch.
                          True, but I doubt stubby utilizes them if he has Rodgers back.

                          Comment

                          • #103
                            Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                            True, but I doubt stubby utilizes them if he has Rodgers back.
                            Valid point.
                            When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                            Comment

                            • #104
                              They say 80% healed is suitable to play. Assuming it's true that Rodgers wants to play, PLAY HIM!

                              I've been a big supporter of Hundley, but the fact is, the game at Carolina is probably the toughest of the three, and it's unlikely we could win it without Aaron Rodgers. If we lose at Carolina with him, then sit him out.

                              What's the worst case? Back to square one with a re-break. He then still should be completely healed by next season.
                              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                              Comment

                              • #105
                                Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                                It's hard to take this seriously. Packers were 4-1 with Rodgers. They nearly beat Pittsburgh without him. I get the accumulated injury deal, but that's a problem for everyone. Just ask Philly. You never know what's going to happen. Maybe with Rodgers back, and with a two-headed running game, the Packers could dominate TOP against other teams and protect their defensive-back depleted defense and be totally competitive. If Rodgers is healthy, who knows - maybe he gets as blistering hot as in 2010 and they run a team off the field when they weren't supposed to and it propels them to Championship. Careers are limited, you never want to miss an opportunity, no matter how improbable.
                                That's the little glimmer of hope that clicks with me. I've always heard that an O-Line prefers run blocking and that it really helps when the D doesn't know exactly what you're going to do. Keeps them off balance and easier to handle.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 template Next
                                Working...
                                X