Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Spinning, Spinning, Spinning: Ted's the Scapegoat, Mike's the Tough Guy in Charge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
    The problem, of course, is when young and inexperienced players can't or won't execute Capers' "schemes, trickery and compensation" on Sunday afternoon. How about a DC who believes in KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid)?
    If they can't grasp it, why are they in the NFL? There's more here than simple complexity.
    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
      If they can't grasp it, why are they in the NFL? There's more here than simple complexity.
      I'm listening...
      One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
      John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

      Comment


      • #33
        I thought this year was the double whammy. Opposing offenses had figured out the Packers defense, but some of the Packers defenders hadn't. You can't go totally simple, or sophisticated NFL offenses will pick it apart.

        There has to be a happy medium between


        and

        I can't run no more
        With that lawless crowd
        While the killers in high places
        Say their prayers out loud
        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
        A thundercloud
        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
          I thought this year was the double whammy. Opposing offenses had figured out the Packers defense, but some of the Packers defenders hadn't. You can't go totally simple, or sophisticated NFL offenses will pick it apart.

          There has to be a happy medium between


          and

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by woodbuck27 View Post
            I find it fascinating how so many Packerrats are 'bang on' and seeing typos and being Spelling Nazi's; yet can't (again) see 'the forest for the trees', and all things correct and Packer Nation moving forward.

            You know .......... 'the right fit'.

            Right ... bats are hardly 'bland' their unfortunately simply becoming, where I come from, too 'rare'.
            your bats
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
              I also think you're looking at this the right way. Something's rotten in the state of Denmark.

              However, the only plausible scenario that might run counter to this is that M3 trusted the development of Hundley and preparing the offensive game plan to his QB coach and offensive coordinator. Both of them are gone. Perhaps his "He's our guy" rant at the podium is because he's long been known to not throw people under the bus unless he feels it's the best way to teach a guy (and he uses it very sparingly and seemingly never for coaches).

              There's so much going on here that we don't know and will never know. We can only speculate based on opinions of people close to the team while ignoring whatever random drivel Woody comes up with.
              QFT

              In the absence of information, people will make shit up, see: McGinn and Woody.

              We know next to nothing of what really transpired, we know very little about the personalities, the dynamics or the thought processes behind the decisions.

              I trust it was the right decision to have Ted step down. I hope keeping M3 was the right decision. I hope that Murphy is competent and will make the right call.

              If not, then welcome to the rest of the NFL, it's been a great run.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                I thought this year was the double whammy. Opposing offenses had figured out the Packers defense, but some of the Packers defenders hadn't. You can't go totally simple, or sophisticated NFL offenses will pick it apart.

                There has to be a happy medium between


                and

                I'd error on the side of KISS. Same for the offense. When it takes WR's two or three years to learn what MM and ARod expect them to know, you make yourself vulnerable when injuries occur. Or when veterans leave for FAgency and their replacements are greener than grass. Plus, the more complicated the system, the harder it becomes to plug in FA subsitutes mid-season. We don't need a system that favors Wonderlic scores over football instincts, IMO.
                One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                  Think idiot is strong Guys from our team go somewhere else and excel, did they just get good or did the new coach actually coach them. We have the raw talent on d just magically nobody knows what the hell is going on.
                  Beside Hyde and Hayward, who do you mean? Did you see Zombo get run out of a play by Mariota last night?

                  Hyde and Hayward both played well here. Hyde was a safety and Hayward a corner who could dominate in zone. They weren't terrible when not playing to their strengths either. Hyde took a lot of grief as a slot CB allowing passes across the middle, but trail coverage on a crossing route or TE coverage were problems in this D before he got here. His lack of speed did not help him solve it but he played the position wisely and did make some plays.

                  Since Hyde was not going to start at safety for Dom and Hayward was not a lock for the #2 CB job, Ted did not pay either like a well compensated starter. There was also the question of both contributing to some terrible defenses. Put on better defense and playing their natural spot, both excelled, though I am still no sold on Hyde as an All Pro, that defense he is on fell down hard in the second half of the season.

                  So either the DC adjusts the scheme and incorporates the talent or the GM gets new players when they are no longer cheap.

                  Dom didn't start them and Ted wasn't going to sign FAs just so they fit the open peg in Doms defense. Ergo, trouble.

                  The problem here is that no one ever squared this circle, and that is the fault of the organization. And McCarthy, who fired Capers only after a year that would make almost any move seem wise, has the same coordination question to answer now with two new guys.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
                    If they can't grasp it, why are they in the NFL? There's more here than simple complexity.
                    Its a great question. And the fact that the D line coach and LB coach were let go doesn't answer the question about whether the assistants were part of the problem (especially in the backend). You also need to wonder about coach input about personnel decisions. Should Hyde and Hayward been more prized than they were? Hayward didn't start and Hyde was played out of position.

                    But there is a complexity with the Capers D that has long been acknowledged. He and Le Beau both preferred to have vets out there. Rather than simplify, they wanted to add rules to existing schemes to deal with new threats from the offense.

                    And this defense came together in 1992 or so. It was born of concepts that go back to Jim Mora and the old AFC 3-4. Its been modified heavily.

                    Capers moved to preferring (not sure whether this was him or Ted's talent) man coverage compared to Le Beau's zone.

                    But there is no question the D was designed to feature a full complement of adjustments, rules and techniques that required detailed understanding. It was not like the design of college D or Jimmy Johnson's D where it was simple and needed to be played fast.

                    However, somehow Gregg Williams, Jim Johnson (Philly D) and the Schwartz run some complex blitzes and coverages make it work. I don't think Dom was so far outside the norm that it couldn't work, but it made life tough for rooks (see early Nick Collins or Josh Jones).
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X