BRETT HUNDLEY.......WTF ?

[woodbuck27]

The only reason he caught that hail mary is he was 8 yards behind everyone else.

Nope.

At 13 Seconds on this Highlight Video Richard Rodgers is clearly across the Goal Line and going up to make the ridiculously and incredibly famous reception of a ridiculously incredible 61 or plus yard throw from Aaron Rodgers to that End Zone. It was all just simply P E R F E C T.

Richard Rodgers 'instinctively' knew that if he hustled any more or got too deep in that End Zone that being in or behind the crowd wouldn't play.

See that's the ting I believe many Of you fellas are missing and what is vital or instinctive chemistry and between Pro Athletes. That comes from something called experience.


This Season that will be gone with the likes of Richard Rodgers now in Philly and Jordy Nelson now in Oakland.

I bet Aaron Rodgers is well aware of this as a TRUTH because he's now an accomplished PRO and has added some wisdom to his above average intelligence.. Chemistry often doesn't (if it does at all) develop in a little while. It takes a lot of practise and repetition and comradeship.

That cannot be just replaced it must be redeveloped with the right Team Mates. If at TE Jimmy H Graham Trumps Richard Rodgers !

Who have the Packer Brass brought to Green Bay's Roster to replace Aaron Rodgers to Jordy Nelson and TN !?

N O O N E !

[Joemailman]

The only reason he caught that hail mary is he was 8 yards behind everyone else.

[mraynrand]

The only reason he caught that hail mary is he was 8 yards behind everyone else.

This is correct. Rodgers was trailing on the play (was 'behind' everyone else getting to the end zone), so he was in position to catch the ball that was 'under thrown' relative to the deep coverage. Rodgers wasn't covered on the play.

[hoosier]

It was a back shoulder hail mary.

[Joemailman]

This is correct. Rodgers was trailing on the play (was 'behind' everyone else getting to the end zone), so he was in position to catch the ball that was 'under thrown' relative to the deep coverage. Rodgers wasn't covered on the play.

Okay, I guess I misinterpreted what Zool meant by behind. Although I think Rodgers was exactly where he was supposed to be when he was supposed to be.

[woodbuck27]

This is correct. Rodgers was trailing on the play (was 'behind' everyone else getting to the end zone), so he was in position to catch the ball that was 'under thrown' relative to the deep coverage. Rodgers wasn't covered on the play.

in ... position ... to catch ... the ball ... that was 'under thrown'

doo daa ... doo daa ... doo daa ... doo daa

assholes will consistently act like...................assholes.

Sure distract from the one truly GREAT play Richard Rodgers made and.....

GTH !

[Zool]

Okay, I guess I misinterpreted what Zool meant by behind. Although I think Rodgers was exactly where he was supposed to be when he was supposed to be.

When he comes into frame, he’s at the 8 yard line. Was his pattern to run around at the 20 until Rodgers throws the ball?

[Joemailman]

When he comes into frame, he’s at the 8 yard line. Was his pattern to run around at the 20 until Rodgers throws the ball?

He's 6'5", 270 lbs. I think his pattern was to use his big body to block out everyone else just as the ball arrives. He had to delay because Rodgers had to escape pressure and roll out before throwing the ball. It was about 8 seconds from the snap until Rodgers threw the ball.

[Bretsky]

Bretsky my responses are under yours.

" RICHARD RODGERS SUCKED; Losing him for a sack of beans caused many in Packer Nation to scream for joy. His speed made Ed the Toolbox West look like Randy Moss. "

The Eagles signed TE Richard Rodgers to a one-year contract. He had some early success in Green Bay but has been buried on the depth chart the last two seasons. He'll replace Trey Burton as a receiving complement to Zach Ertz in sub-packages. Rodgers has below-average blocking for a No. 2 tight end, but he gives the Eagles another red-zone option

Bretsky I have no issue with letting RR walk after signing TE Jimmy Graham. That signing made RR more than just redundant.

What annoys me is that we still have still have Brett Hundley as 'a Camp Arm' at best and the possibility he might have been retained linked to the Colin Kaepernick's Lagal Teams announced plan to depose Mike McCarthy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEKLh0VWybw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoxNqHKiCI8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNTMdkLwjms

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byRgneHF9Io

If any of that has ANYTHING whatsoever to do with keeping 'only decent at gum chewing' *** Brett Hundley that really SUCKS !

*** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Hundley


" Many are excited about Jimmy Graham; his former team the Saints wanted him back badly and we won out that battle. "

I don't like it that this TE is blocking challenged and the Packers paid $10 Million$ for a Red Zone Specialist. Yes Graham is coming off his first double-digit touchdown campaign since 2014; but his YPC dropped dramatically from 14.2 to 9.1 in 2017. That drop off was another year removed from his devastating knee injury. He's an advancing aged TE at 31 Yes and he required frequent maintenance days in Seattle. Aaron Rodgers has the skills and touch with his passes to possibly make this a HR acquisition; but with the decline in the Packers WR Stable the Offense needs to get into the Red Zone to make Jimmy Graham's acquisition realistic. Who have they added at WR? How much CAP was available (after the Graham and Wilkerson signings) to add anything and experience, even approaching quality? See my comments (below) RE: The DL and Muhammad Wilkerson signing.



" Talent Wise Wilkinson is a gigantic upgrade at DL if he refocuses his efforts and plays like he did when last coached by out current Defensive Coordinator. And we didn't break the bank to sign him. "

Considering the cost to the CAP this is a good risk and Wilkerson's upside as long as his attitude is full on 'Packers Thanks and you made a good move'. I believe also given that arguably on the 'D', that the DL is the Packers strongest Position of their ELEVEN that this signing is to use Pugger's word 'telling'.

At Pick NO. 14 will the Packers trade up? NO and not as I saw on the NFL Network for the shot to grab EDGE Marcus Davenport. Will the Packers trade down? Very possibly, yet with the addition of Muhammad Wilkerson is it a highest priority to draft at EDGE ? Maybe they look at their best and Davenport Vs EDGE Harold Landry.

The thing is today, the Green Bay Packer have huge need at CB and certainly amongst the worst NFL Teams and the CB position. All of a sudden the Packers look weak at WR.

The DL addition and Muhammad Wilkerson signing signals that the Packers will focus their early Round Picks ie NO. 14 and NO's 45;76 and. 10 on predominant DB (CB and S) and WR prospects.


"And Mike Mccarthy let Dom Capers go and replaced him with a very exciting DC giving us hope."

That move was way too late and should have happened three Seasons ago if not before that. All of Packer Nation knew that as the 2017 Season went Dom Capers was cooked that MM would make this 'no brainer' move or replace Dom Capers at DC. We're pulling for DC Mike Pettine.


" And he ridded himself of Edgar Bennett who to be honest was a poor OC. If MM had a fault with Edgar Bennett it may have been promoting him too much and too fast. He was a good RB and WR coach; he was not a OC. "

I've no comment on MM's decision to release @017 OC Edgar Bennett. Ghessh ! The Surname Bennett (ie Martellus and Michael) and the NFL has a certain stigma about it and the year 2017. Former long time Packer Coach and player Edgar Bennett III, landed in Oakland with a (may be perceived) demotion as their WR Coach.


" I'd argue all of these moves were good ones that should create excitement. "

I'd never argue with you Bretsky as I've come to respect your positions. I wouldn't waste any time even making a RE-Post with the people in here I consider challenged and having 'a real clue' as to things REAL and Packers or NFL

I merely add insight into why I think as I do as 'a respect to you' Bretsky.

GOOD POST WOODBUCK
I pretty much agree with everything you noted in here.
I just tend to like MM more than you do.

Brett

[Zool]

GOOD POST WOODBUCK
I pretty much agree with everything you noted in here.
I just tend to like MM more than you do.

Brett

There’s no way you read that whole thing.

[Harlan Huckleby]

It was an act of God, a miracle. Can't we just leave it that?

[red]

This is correct. Rodgers was trailing on the play (was 'behind' everyone else getting to the end zone), so he was in position to catch the ball that was 'under thrown' relative to the deep coverage. Rodgers wasn't covered on the play.

Lol, an underthrown ball that went 70 yards and almost hit the roof

[pbmax]

Lol, an underthrown ball that went 70 yards and almost hit the roof

I don't know about under thrown. It would have hit almost the dead center of the end zone.

It was such a moonshot, that I think the players down there early thought it was going deeper, but just kept climbing higher.

[mraynrand]

Lol, an underthrown ball that went 70 yards and almost hit the roof

that's why 'under thrown' was in quotes. Because the play was designed to have Rodgers come up late and catch the 'short throw' versus the 'long throw' if it went to the back of the end zone (you can see that play in the NYG playoff game catch to Cobb). I'm using short and long relative to the Endzone and the coverage.

[mraynrand]

It was an act of God, a miracle. Can't we just leave it that?

no