Ok, Who is the One Top Rated Guy You DON"T Want?

[The Shadow]

Calvin Ridley

[pbmax]

I don't think I want Davenport or Landry at 14. Though Bill Polian just about wet himself describing Davenport on ESPN an hour ago.

[hoosier]

Baker Mayfield

[Bretsky]

I don't think I want Davenport or Landry at 14. Though Bill Polian just about wet himself describing Davenport on ESPN an hour ago.

AGREE

Like Joe Mailman's scenario

I want the FAB 5

[Bretsky]

2). Marcus Davenport, UTSA---MIKE MAYOCK

There is quite the drop off at this position after Chubb. Davenport is a player who still needs time ti fill out into his frame. His motor also doesn’t allow him to be a player who provides consistent pressure on the quarterback at this point in his career. He has been a stand up pass rusher at UTSA, but he has the Build to become a defensive end in a 4-3 if needed. He is a player who is still fairly far from his potential.

[Teamcheez1]

2). Marcus Davenport, UTSA---MIKE MAYOCK

There is quite the drop off at this position after Chubb. Davenport is a player who still needs time ti fill out into his frame. His motor also doesn’t allow him to be a player who provides consistent pressure on the quarterback at this point in his career. He has been a stand up pass rusher at UTSA, but he has the Build to become a defensive end in a 4-3 if needed. He is a player who is still fairly far from his potential.

Is this Justin Harrell 2.0?

[woodbuck27]

I don't want NO 14 used on either Davenport or Landry. I don't want NO. 14 to be used 'on smaller' and WR Calvin Ridley or CB Joshua Jackson.

It takes a lot of work and reading to arrive at such thinking. Sure it's great to have a higher Draft Pic but really !? Isn't there a sharp drop off in talent (Grade) after the first 10 -12 picks, and not targeting QB Prospect Lamar Jackson even as Draft Trade bait? Maybe Lamar Jackson is the Packers Guy because after Aaron Rodgers the Packers have little as a backup QB!?

It will be better to trade down from NO. 14 and target an upgrade possibly for the RHS of the OL and even possible grab a Running Back in a RB heavy Draft. The Packers aren't going to be ready this Season nor likely in 2019. An additional Round two late or Round Three Pick might work out well!?

They shed CAP next Season. ( Clay Mathews III and liely Randall Cobb are history).

They have this immediate and Long Term NEED at OL, OLB. At WR and Defensive Back CB for sure and more at Safety. Do they have a decent blocking TE? Where is that Guy to be found?

They need a ST Kick Returner. Davis isn't the answer. How long has it been since a Packer Kick Returner busted one to the House? Light years!

The Packer Roster needs upgrading all over.

[gbgary]

yup...gotta bad feeling about davenport.

[The Shadow]

I truly hope the Pack doesn't draft a 'project'; a workout warrior that needs to be overly coached up. Please : a real football player!

[mraynrand]

It will be better to trade down from NO. 14 and target an upgrade possibly for the RHS of the OL and even possible grab a Running Back in a RB heavy Draft.

why in the world would they draft a running back with a high draft pick?

[Joemailman]

Vita Vea. Fine player, but he'd just be a rotational player with the strength of the defensive line.

[Zool]

Vita Vea. Fine player, but he'd just be a rotational player with the strength of the defensive line.

Unless they really want to be a multiples D. Clark and Vea in the middle could be a hellova tandem.

[mraynrand]

Unless they really want to be a multiples D. Clark and Vea in the middle could be a hellova tandem.

Putting the other team on their heels by getting a lead with big plays from the offense is one strategy. Another is creating a formidable pass rush. Maybe shorter fields for a Rodgers-led offense is better option than asking him to create big plays all the time.

[Deputy Nutz]

2). Marcus Davenport, UTSA---MIKE MAYOCK

There is quite the drop off at this position after Chubb. Davenport is a player who still needs time ti fill out into his frame. His motor also doesn’t allow him to be a player who provides consistent pressure on the quarterback at this point in his career. He has been a stand up pass rusher at UTSA, but he has the Build to become a defensive end in a 4-3 if needed. He is a player who is still fairly far from his potential.

Don't buy it. Davenport will take time to develop but what I have seen and heard is the guy just wants to get better and better. The guy is sort of a freak athletically

[Deputy Nutz]

I agree I don't think the Packers should use the 14th pick on Davenport or Landry or any pass rusher that is not named Chubb. The Packers have over 20 million invested this season in Perry and Matthews and they are going to eat those contracts. Pass rusher is tremendously weak at the top of this draft. Packers are better off waiting until day two or three to invest in a project or two. The Packers really need to get more athletic in the secondary and at linebacker. There will be several options available at pick 14. Regardless unless some magical fall from one of the top players in this draft class I feel like no matter who the Packers pick everyone will think it is a reach.

So I don't want to see Landry selected with the 14th pick