Since the Packers haven't practiced in front of the media in over a week, I can't help but speculate on what new wrinkles they might be developing for the West Coast Offense. Here is my crazy theory.
The decision to keep four tight ends and only four receivers has me intrigued. Plus, they have a TE on the practice squad. If the packers believe they have this many good TE's, they must be planning a lot of two TE sets. But, could they possibly be working on a three TE set? Does the opposing defense bring in a nickel package that could be exploited by bringing one in motion to block like a fullback?(They experimented with TE's as fullbacks in the preseason) Would the defense bring in an extra linebacker(presuming most teams don't have 4 good linebackers that can cover) and the packers then exploit that with 2 of the TE's going out for a pass? Maybe this is hairbrained, but with four decent TE's it seems plausible to me.
Any other ideas, or crazy speculation?
The decision to keep four tight ends and only four receivers has me intrigued. Plus, they have a TE on the practice squad. If the packers believe they have this many good TE's, they must be planning a lot of two TE sets. But, could they possibly be working on a three TE set? Does the opposing defense bring in a nickel package that could be exploited by bringing one in motion to block like a fullback?(They experimented with TE's as fullbacks in the preseason) Would the defense bring in an extra linebacker(presuming most teams don't have 4 good linebackers that can cover) and the packers then exploit that with 2 of the TE's going out for a pass? Maybe this is hairbrained, but with four decent TE's it seems plausible to me.
Any other ideas, or crazy speculation?


Comment