Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers 2018 "What If" Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by hoosier View Post
    Another comparison would be parents. If one decides that the difference between adolescent brains and adult brains is a deal breaker, we could study adolescent parents.
    ^^^ ??? Sometimes the internet is confusing - or maybe I have CTE. Do you mean study why parents do or do not place their kids in a particular sport, or that collisions affect developing brains different than adult brains? (or both?) . I think both are relevant.

    In any case, I've said for a while that I think football will be full electronic tackling in the not so far future, but I'm not sure that will help linemen. Alternatively or coincidently, they will make better helmets. Or people will stop playing sports all together, pork out on high carb crap and play endless VR sports in their basements.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
      This is a confused statement. I see no element of 'manhood' in making a decision about possible brain trauma, other than 'being a man' would be to make a rational decision based on perceived risk weighed against life goals for your family and yourself. I think all four pretty much do that with the various aspects weighted differently.
      I suppose you don't hahahaha. Wimping out/quitting early/whatever, where your peers do not, as opposed to whatever risk taking might be involved in continuing? Sure, no issue of manhood there hahahaha. That isn't even the point, though. The whole line of concussion crap is agenda-driven idiocy, and even though they maybe get browbeat to shut up about it, I'm pretty sure players know that. How many players ever had any serious consequence from playing? Very very damn few. How many of those were QBs? a lower percentage even than the already extremely low number in general. How many of that extremely extremely small number had extenuating circumstances - McMahon's drug use for example?

      The QB who got his head bashed in worse than anybody else I can think of is Troy Aikman, and other than some questionable commentary, he seems pretty clear-headed.
      What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
        I suppose you don't hahahaha. Wimping out/quitting early/whatever, where your peers do not, as opposed to whatever risk taking might be involved in continuing?
        you're a fool
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post

          The QB who got his head bashed in worse than anybody else I can think of is Troy Aikman, and other than some questionable commentary, he seems pretty clear-headed.
          He and Steve Young both took some shots and got concussions. So what? What we know is that repetitive hits over long periods correlates with brain symptoms. Both Young and Aikman could develop symptoms earlier and with greater severity than their less-contacted peers, or, it's possible they have received less trauma overall and may not have early onset. There's no way exactly to know, but you, being you, will make declarative absolutive statements from your ignorance, as usual. There's no speculation about that.
          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
            Listening to local radio this morning and the question was proposed, "What if the Packers traded Aaron Rodgers to the Browns?"

            So I thought this was a brilliant idea but they didn't considering anything more than the 1st and the 4th pick in the draft for Rodgers. I would think that Rodgers has 4 good years left and if he is able to follow in the footsteps of Tom Brady he could play another 6 years with out any significant regression. Rodgers has two years left on his deal but with the ability to franchise tag him the Browns could stretch it out and they have way more money under the current cap to give Rodgers and extension before the Packers could. The Browns could also meet his salary demands where the Packers are still trying to get a hometown discount from Rodgers.

            I think the Packers would have to get more than just the 1st and 4th pick for Rodgers. If the Browns really wanted the deal they would be wiling to give up quite a bit to get him. I wish the Packers could also throw in Clay Matthews but I don't think anyone wants his contract. So we will just go with Rodgers for draft picks.

            Packers get:
            1st overall
            4th overall
            35th overall
            101st overall

            Browns get:
            Aaron Rodgers

            What will the Packer do with those draft picks?

            1st Overall: Baker Mayfield The secret consensus among NFL teams was that Baker Mayfield was the top QB in this draft class. It was a well kept secret up until the day of the draft. The Packers could easily go with one of the other QBs but I think that Mayfield is the most pro ready in this draft and without Rodgers on the roster the Packers need to hit the ground running with this selection

            4th Overall: Bradley Chubb This or Denzel Ward. Ward is good but how much better is he than the rest of the corners in this draft? Chubb is the top end pass rusher in this draft.

            Packers 18: Jaire Alexander Packers trade back, and then trade up again and stay pat at corner.

            35th overall: James Daniels The Packers love Iowa lineman and Daniels is no different. He can play center or guard and the Packers plug him at right guard.

            Packers 45th: Josh Jackson Still too good of value to not go Jackson with this pick

            101st overall: Da'Shawn Hand Packers use the first pick in the 4th round and beef up their defensive line.


            So there it is. The Packers make one of the biggest trades in the history of the NFL. Gutey buries Ted Thompson last remaining legacy in Green Bay and rebuilds the Packers.

            At the end of the day I don't think that the trade makes a lot of sense on either side especially trying to stay between the lines of how the draft played out. The 101st pick didn't have the impact I thought it would. I struggled finding the right guy for that spot. There wasn't a receiver, offensive lineman, or linebacker worth taking with that pick.
            The scenario kinda reminds me of when Kareem Abdul Jabar was traded from the Bucks. Admittedly the circumstances were quite different - Kareem was in ascendancy while Rodgers is at his peak, and Abdul Jabar pretty much demanded the trade. But what we got in return was what turned out to be magic beans - Elmore Smith, Brian Winters and a couple of high draft picks that turned into Junior Bridgeman and Dave Meyers. The Bucks were entertaining and marginally competitive while Kareem went on to win 5 titles with the Lakers. So, no. A bird in the hand....

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by QBME View Post
              The scenario kinda reminds me of when Kareem Abdul Jabar was traded from the Bucks. Admittedly the circumstances were quite different - Kareem was in ascendancy while Rodgers is at his peak, and Abdul Jabar pretty much demanded the trade. But what we got in return was what turned out to be magic beans - Elmore Smith, Brian Winters and a couple of high draft picks that turned into Junior Bridgeman and Dave Meyers. The Bucks were entertaining and marginally competitive while Kareem went on to win 5 titles with the Lakers. So, no. A bird in the hand....
              they got what they could, but they also got a marginalized franchise. From then on, even with Nellie, they pretty much could not attract the real difference makers to win a title. Sixers bought Malone and Celtics bought Dennis Johnson in '83 and '84, and froze out the Bucks. Everything the Bucks got was from making shrewd trades and exploiting midrange talent to the max. That is, before the 90's. After that I stopped caring.
              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                they got what they could, but they also got a marginalized franchise. From then on, even with Nellie, they pretty much could not attract the real difference makers to win a title. Sixers bought Malone and Celtics bought Dennis Johnson in '83 and '84, and froze out the Bucks. Everything the Bucks got was from making shrewd trades and exploiting midrange talent to the max. That is, before the 90's. After that I stopped caring.
                Exactly. I know it's for a different thread and probably a different site, but they're up against it again with the Greek Freak. Something about history repeating itself - same old story with a new set of words, or something like that.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by The Shadow View Post
                  I suspect Rodgers will walk away from the game before really risking his health.
                  It's a bit late for that.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                    ^^^ ??? Sometimes the internet is confusing - or maybe I have CTE. Do you mean study why parents do or do not place their kids in a particular sport, or that collisions affect developing brains different than adult brains? (or both?) . I think both are relevant.

                    In any case, I've said for a while that I think football will be full electronic tackling in the not so far future, but I'm not sure that will help linemen. Alternatively or coincidently, they will make better helmets. Or people will stop playing sports all together, pork out on high carb crap and play endless VR sports in their basements.
                    No, I was too obtuse. I meant parents banging their heads against the wall.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                      they got what they could, but they also got a marginalized franchise. From then on, even with Nellie, they pretty much could not attract the real difference makers to win a title. Sixers bought Malone and Celtics bought Dennis Johnson in '83 and '84, and froze out the Bucks. Everything the Bucks got was from making shrewd trades and exploiting midrange talent to the max. That is, before the 90's. After that I stopped caring.
                      Bucks in early to mid 80s were on the cusp. At that point it wasn't about attracting or not attracting free agents. The Celtics drafted Bird and McHale and traded for Parrish and Archibald, while the Bucks drafted Kent Benson and Quinn Buckner. Two of many Bobby Knight star pupils who never amounted to anything as pros. Drafting Bird and fleecing Golden State for Parrish/McHale were the difference between being the Bucks and being the Celtics. And even for all that they were still very close.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by hoosier View Post
                        Bucks in early to mid 80s were on the cusp. At that point it wasn't about attracting or not attracting free agents. The Celtics drafted Bird and McHale and traded for Parrish and Archibald, while the Bucks drafted Kent Benson and Quinn Buckner. Two of many Bobby Knight star pupils who never amounted to anything as pros. Drafting Bird and fleecing Golden State for Parrish/McHale were the difference between being the Bucks and being the Celtics. And even for all that they were still very close.
                        It's both really. They were able to buy the extra pieces. And in the 80's Milwaukee wasn't much of a destination. I forgot about the Parrish trade. Fortuitous how the Celtics got Bird and LA got Magic, wasn't it?
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                          Well, it's not perfectly clear what the numbers are/will be in apples for apples comparisons. CTE is real, and long-term effects of repeated collisions are real (the longer they occur of lifespan and the total number correlates with severity of symptoms). But what still remains to be fleshed out is concussion symptoms compared to controls from other sports where collisions happen. Some of the numbers from Lacross and soccer are interesting. Again, what really seems to matter is the number of collisions over a lot of years, so some collision sports that have a shorter run (high school and/or college only), and people who play fewer years in high school, college, and NFL don't have the same prognosis. A good comparison will be more aggressive and longitudinal hockey and soccer players. (the acceleration of headers in soccer are almost twice as much as football hits and hockey head-to-head collisions are in-between).

                          Science of this is not 'settled' - other than correlation of sustained/repeated impacts over years - and much of the reporting is hysterical.
                          If I can add it all up through the years from falling off the playset as a kid, or banging my head on the toy box, to 10 years plus of tackle football, 10 years of wrestling and coaching wrestling, falling and hitting your head playing basketball, several fist fights, random act of getting or hitting your head on something, and 2 years of playing rugby I would be able to count up to at least a dozen legit concussions with concussion like symptoms, and then add in the repeated blows to the head that in themselves aren't concussion causing blows but the total sum is not real good. I think that I am dealing with the initial symptoms of CTE.

                          I can't remember people's names for shit anymore. Last year I didn't bother with the NFL draft. This year for what ever reason I was pretty excited for it and I thought I provide a good quantity of material here at Packerrats. I struggled remembering names of players. It was quite shocking.

                          I am struggling to remember the names and positions of some of the guys I coached last year when discussing them with other coaches. Right now the symptoms seem to just be annoying, but I have enough concern that I am going to go see a specialist this summer.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            The "Parrish trade" was actually the Great Heist. Boston gave up their D1.1 and D1.13 in exchange for Parrish and the D1.3. With their newly acquired picks Golden State drafted Joe Barry Carroll and Rickey Brown. With their D1.3 Boston got McHale, the only HOF in the 1980 draft.

                            In those dark years, teams could draft college players in the year before they were ready to sign (Bird played out his senior year at Indiana State after getting drafted). And teams signing free agents had to compensate the player's former team, often with multiple high draft picks. For instance, the Lakers got three D1s from Utah (and gave up one of their own) as compensation for the Jazz signing Gail Goodrich. Oops.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                              Well, it's not perfectly clear what the numbers are/will be in apples for apples comparisons. CTE is real, and long-term effects of repeated collisions are real (the longer they occur of lifespan and the total number correlates with severity of symptoms). But what still remains to be fleshed out is concussion symptoms compared to controls from other sports where collisions happen. Some of the numbers from Lacross and soccer are interesting. Again, what really seems to matter is the number of collisions over a lot of years, so some collision sports that have a shorter run (high school and/or college only), and people who play fewer years in high school, college, and NFL don't have the same prognosis. A good comparison will be more aggressive and longitudinal hockey and soccer players. (the acceleration of headers in soccer are almost twice as much as football hits and hockey head-to-head collisions are in-between).

                              Science of this is not 'settled' - other than correlation of sustained/repeated impacts over years - and much of the reporting is hysterical.
                              Agreed the science is at the correlation/causation phase. I was referring to Tex's usual idiotic take on the situation.

                              It will be interesting to see if there's body physiology that makes some people more susceptible than others. Like the 92 year old woman who smoked for 75 years without issue, versus the 25 year old kid with throat cancer.
                              Originally posted by 3irty1
                              This is museum quality stupidity.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
                                If I can add it all up through the years from falling off the playset as a kid, or banging my head on the toy box, to 10 years plus of tackle football, 10 years of wrestling and coaching wrestling, falling and hitting your head playing basketball, several fist fights, random act of getting or hitting your head on something, and 2 years of playing rugby I would be able to count up to at least a dozen legit concussions with concussion like symptoms, and then add in the repeated blows to the head that in themselves aren't concussion causing blows but the total sum is not real good. I think that I am dealing with the initial symptoms of CTE.

                                I can't remember people's names for shit anymore. Last year I didn't bother with the NFL draft. This year for what ever reason I was pretty excited for it and I thought I provide a good quantity of material here at Packerrats. I struggled remembering names of players. It was quite shocking.

                                I am struggling to remember the names and positions of some of the guys I coached last year when discussing them with other coaches. Right now the symptoms seem to just be annoying, but I have enough concern that I am going to go see a specialist this summer.
                                First of all, let me say that I hope all goes well for you, and that your symptoms don't progress.

                                But to address the general issue, depending on your age, what you're experiencing may not be out of the 'control' range. I'm 50, played basketball and ran track and cross country in high school and college (and beyond). I can only remember (ha ha) getting my 'bell rung' about 4-5 times from bike accidents, neighborhood and intramural football games, etc. Even Darrell Thompson didn't deliver a concussion when he ran me over like a freight train. Yet I am experience much the same things you report. Thank goodness for Google or I couldn't recall half of what I used to know (like those NBA trades). Which is all to say that the concern I have with the CTE scare (and it is a scare) may be that it's real, but the statistically significant variance may not be that broad (just to make something up, say those with repeated brain trauma showing early onset symptoms on average at 55 instead of the population average of 57). That's what's murky at this point. And it's become a politically charged issue, because football is a target (otherwise you'd hear a LOT more about hockey and other sports). I personally know of a retrospective longitudinal study showing no significant increase in CTE symptoms following football careers (high school and college). The study was carried out by a researcher who was trying to confirm early onset. As of rn, no journal will accept the paper. You can speculate why, but I know the principle investigator and her work is exemplary.

                                My personal opinion is that there will ultimately be very strong evidence of cause and effect, but that the variance from controls will be less than people think. And also that people better pay attention to other sports as well...
                                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X