Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Marcedes Lewis Signing With Packers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marcedes Lewis Signing With Packers

    Tom Silverstein @TomSilverstein

    New from JSOnline and PackersNews: Tight end Marcedes Lewis says he's signing with Packers https://ift.tt/2ILNX4x #Packers
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  • #2
    linebacker help, we need more linebackers

    he was a decent player, but do we really need him?

    Comment


    • #3
      Sounds like they've been in contact with him for a long time as they wanted a "top end" blocking tight end. Sounded as if they can play Graham as WR 3/4, and still have a TE in the package.
      "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

      Comment


      • #4
        Ben Fennell @BenFennell_NFL
        Listen to #Eagles DC Jim Schwartz.. 13 (3TE) personnel is a nightmare for defenses. It is the answer to the ever-evolving subpackage NFL.
        Get 3 TEs who can block, catch, run. Look at the 2017 Eagles offense and how they manipulated defenses with the use of Ertz, Celek, Burton

        James Light @JamesALight
        Jim Schwartz on why 13 & 22 Personnel groups are the toughest to defend

        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          Two TE sets with Graham and Lewis could be a winning combination.
          sigpic

          If your not the lead dog , then the view never changes !

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by pbmax View Post
            Ben Fennell @BenFennell_NFL
            Listen to #Eagles DC Jim Schwartz.. 13 (3TE) personnel is a nightmare for defenses. It is the answer to the ever-evolving subpackage NFL.
            Get 3 TEs who can block, catch, run. Look at the 2017 Eagles offense and how they manipulated defenses with the use of Ertz, Celek, Burton

            James Light @JamesALight
            Jim Schwartz on why 13 & 22 Personnel groups are the toughest to defend

            https://twitter.com/JamesALight/stat...90820183969792

            I heard the suggestion in there of the general principle that Capers liked - the ability for your defense to play against a number of different formations without substitution. OK, so that's pretty much 'duh' but in practice it has to be pretty challenging. But given the number of offenses like the Packers that liked to run the 'hurry up' no sub offense, being 'multiple' with a base defense is essential. Oh, and nickel is base.
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
              I heard the suggestion in there of the general principle that Capers liked - the ability for your defense to play against a number of different formations without substitution. OK, so that's pretty much 'duh' but in practice it has to be pretty challenging. But given the number of offenses like the Packers that liked to run the 'hurry up' no sub offense, being 'multiple' with a base defense is essential. Oh, and nickel is base.
              And I think that is why Schwartz is saying the challenge now is if the offense can run and pass from heavy personnel. Because they have moved to nickel and speedier personnel, the worrisome threat is a bigger offense that can pass.
              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                And I think that is why Schwartz is saying the challenge now is if the offense can run and pass from heavy personnel. Because they have moved to nickel and speedier personnel, the worrisome threat is a bigger offense that can pass.
                thus all the tall receivers, no?
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                  thus all the tall receivers, no?
                  I think you are right, but I am not certain that is the direction McCarthy/Philbin are moving.

                  I think they prefer height/speed if elite talent isn't available (Jennings, Cobb, Adams, once a generation find like Driver). But does it change the offense? This seems more personnel evaluation preferences.

                  The way spread offense torments a defense is to put your worst athletes into coverage (SS, ILB) or run routes that abuse a certain coverage. Tall WR isn't normally doing that by themselves unless you get a certain Smurf set at CB.

                  But they could zig while all others zag and run heavy and push around smaller defenses. Adams and someone might turn into Jordy and James.

                  That being said, the best thing the Packers D has going for it from last year is that the D line and Martinez can defend the run with 5 guys.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                    Ben Fennell @BenFennell_NFL
                    Listen to #Eagles DC Jim Schwartz.. 13 (3TE) personnel is a nightmare for defenses. It is the answer to the ever-evolving subpackage NFL.
                    Get 3 TEs who can block, catch, run. Look at the 2017 Eagles offense and how they manipulated defenses with the use of Ertz, Celek, Burton

                    James Light @JamesALight
                    Jim Schwartz on why 13 & 22 Personnel groups are the toughest to defend

                    https://twitter.com/JamesALight/stat...90820183969792
                    I agree which is why I like signing Bennett and Kendrick last year before Bennett became...well, himself.

                    Problem is that Graham can't block and Mercedes can no longer run. The key to his statement was "block, catch, run"

                    This is why MM is outdated and finished imo. First, he has always thought having a blocking TE was a good idea. Kevin Barry blocking as a TE was a good idea. A guy 70 pounds lighter than Barry that can't run a route anymore is...well...kevin barry light.

                    Now I said I can be onboard with Graham as our TE since MM can't figure out how to use a multi talented TE anyway, but now we sign a no catch blocking TE. Are we going to run like we did when Hundley was the QB or are we going to call 10 runs a game like we did against Carolina?

                    Wist like to talk about Capers being clueless with the 2-4, but honestly I think when it comes to TE play MM has no fucking clue whatsoever and this signing proves it. Teams will put 8 men in the box whenever Lewis is in the game, we will run into their teeth and MM will wonder how in the world they knew we wouldn't pass the ball.

                    Edit: He might get really creative and have Lewis pass block and send 3 WR into a route and wonder why no one got open.
                    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                      Tom Silverstein @TomSilverstein

                      New from JSOnline and PackersNews: Tight end Marcedes Lewis says he's signing with Packers https://ift.tt/2ILNX4x #Packers
                      This move is a further attempt to ensure more protection for Aaron Rodgers.

                      It's another piece of the puzzel tat was missing and has been at least in it's efforts addressed.
                      ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                      ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                      ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                      ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                        I agree which is why I like signing Bennett and Kendrick last year before Bennett became...well, himself.

                        Problem is that Graham can't block and Mercedes can no longer run. The key to his statement was "block, catch, run"

                        This is why MM is outdated and finished imo. First, he has always thought having a blocking TE was a good idea. Kevin Barry blocking as a TE was a good idea. A guy 70 pounds lighter than Barry that can't run a route anymore is...well...kevin barry light.

                        Now I said I can be onboard with Graham as our TE since MM can't figure out how to use a multi talented TE anyway, but now we sign a no catch blocking TE. Are we going to run like we did when Hundley was the QB or are we going to call 10 runs a game like we did against Carolina?

                        Wist like to talk about Capers being clueless with the 2-4, but honestly I think when it comes to TE play MM has no fucking clue whatsoever and this signing proves it. Teams will put 8 men in the box whenever Lewis is in the game, we will run into their teeth and MM will wonder how in the world they knew we wouldn't pass the ball.

                        Edit: He might get really creative and have Lewis pass block and send 3 WR into a route and wonder why no one got open.
                        I'm not sure why this rant about McCarthy not utilizing TEs well. When he had a guy like Graham (Finley and Cook), he utilized them well. It would be great to have three great, all around TEs. There aren't many teams that even have two decent ones. The Chargers with Gates and Henry may have been the closest. Philadelphia did fine with three players with a similar skill set as the Packers current group. Ertz and Graham being the flex TEs, Celek and Lewis being the blocking TEs, and Burton and Kendricks being the undersized flex/H-Back types.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                          I'm not sure why this rant about McCarthy not utilizing TEs well. When he had a guy like Graham (Finley and Cook), he utilized them well. It would be great to have three great, all around TEs. There aren't many teams that even have two decent ones. The Chargers with Gates and Henry may have been the closest. Philadelphia did fine with three players with a similar skill set as the Packers current group. Ertz and Graham being the flex TEs, Celek and Lewis being the blocking TEs, and Burton and Kendricks being the undersized flex/H-Back types.
                          Celek and Ertz both have good all around games. Both can "run, block, catch". Its true that they both lean a bit better in one area, but Graham is the worst blocking TE I have ever seen and Mercedes is no longer a threat to do anything other than block (and as I said, a T lined up at TE is the same).

                          The 2 examples of TE you mentioned MM used well were catch only, no blocking TEs. Finley was a try hard bad blocker at least. And again, that is why I said signing Graham was probably a good move for us (and trading an all pro center and a 1st was a horrible move for Seattle.)
                          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                            Graham is the worst blocking TE I have ever seen
                            You made Colt Lyerla smile
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                              You made Colt Lyerla smile
                              Bobble has never seen Richard Rodgers block.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X