Barnett giving locker room material to Bears

[Scott Campbell]

You better hope we give them something to get fired up for. You wouldn't want them coming out flat like they did against the Panthers.

Once again the Packers are not the Panthers. Today showed just that. Never again should you mention anything pertaining to any team other than the one YOU cheer for.

So you think Nick's comments were the difference in the game - huh?

[packiowa]

You call that locker room material? Yawn.

Well I think something made that defense mad enough to make you guys have a goose egg

I'm not sure the bears had as much to do with the goose egg as you think


I'd be a bit concerned about the 4 fg's if I were you.... red zone offense was NOT very good.

good win though.... I'm really bummed. You should be pleased.

Not too concerned seeing that they never had to punt until the late in the third quarter. They moved the ball well and when it counted. If all you can complain about is 1td and four FG's with this defense then I think you have a good problem.

Int in the end zone, that was a given after Grossman's first reaction to pressure. One fg after a turnover on the kickoff. A general inability to run the ball for first downs. One broken play by the Packers secondary for the only t.d. A couple diving, great catches by Moose. Two bobbles caught by Clark. No drops.

I'd say things went pretty well for the Bears offense. Moose and Grossman looked pretty good, although Grossman gets an itchy trigger finger when he thinks he's "on". Surely, enough to win, but any Bears fan that thinks they played Superbowl offense is crazy.

The special teams were superbowl worthy.

The defense was put in a perfect position. In the first quarter, the packers were able to move the ball on the ground. Of course, to the Bears advantage, we were put in 3rd and 4th and 1. Our biggest weakness matches the Bears strength on those plays and for some reason we just ran the obvious play. Good stops, but the Bears need to run and stop the run a lot better than that to get to the Superbowl like the papers are claiming.

Lastly, what's up with the Chicago papers giving the Bears rb's a B grade. They were a C at best and maybe worse if you consider their missed blitz pickups.

[Dabaddestbear]

Int in the end zone, that was a given after Grossman's first reaction to pressure.

He was looking to throw the ball out of the endzone but screwed that one up. take it as a punt.

One fg after a turnover on the kickoff. A general inability to run the ball for first downs. One broken play by the Packers secondary for the only t.d. A couple diving, great catches by Moose. Two bobbles caught by Clark. No drops.

One diving catch and the others were right where only he could get them in tight coverage. there were some drops just not many.

I'd say things went pretty well for the Bears offense. Moose and Grossman looked pretty good, although Grossman gets an itchy trigger finger when he thinks he's "on". Surely, enough to win, but any Bears fan that thinks they played Superbowl offense is crazy.

The offense played as well as the Colts who many say have a SB offense. Grossman molds himself in the image of Brett---good and bad thing since he will try and sling it up there when he gets hyped.

The special teams were superbowl worthy.

The defense was put in a perfect position. In the first quarter, the packers were able to move the ball on the ground. Of course, to the Bears advantage, we were put in 3rd and 4th and 1. Our biggest weakness matches the Bears strength on those plays and for some reason we just ran the obvious play. Good stops, but the Bears need to run and stop the run a lot better than that to get to the Superbowl like the papers are claiming.

Lastly, what's up with the Chicago papers giving the Bears rb's a B grade. They were a C at best and maybe worse if you consider their missed blitz pickups.

I wouldnt consider 16 total yards rushing in the 1st quarter as able to move the ball on the ground. (be careful of what you state as fact cuz I will call you on it).