Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mack to Pack?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I just suggested it in another thread, but I think Cobb is no lock to make the roster. If you were to cut him, or package him with the 2 firsts for Mack then we would have the cap space to do it. Not sure what mack really would take though and that makes it less likely.
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Zool View Post
      So .01
      ha ha: .0001
      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
        ha ha: .0001
        Well...actually .01% is what I think Zool meant.
        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
          I just suggested it in another thread, but I think Cobb is no lock to make the roster.
          he shouldn't be. He's a really interesting case - because if he's kept on it's for the 'security blanket' factor. But that works both ways now - Cobb is easily blanketed - even Jake Ryan (with his ACL out) probably could easily cover Cobb one on one at this point. But will Stubby keep him because he knows all the routes, can help communicate on the field, and is a 'crafty' veteran?
          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
            Well...actually .01% is what I think Zool meant.
            I think so too. But he didn't write it out so I let 'em have it.
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
              I just suggested it in another thread, but I think Cobb is no lock to make the roster. If you were to cut him, or package him with the 2 firsts for Mack then we would have the cap space to do it. Not sure what mack really would take though and that makes it less likely.
              if you could fool Oakland into taking Cobb, that would be the biggest Packer steal since we gave Seattle Fred Vinson for Ahman Green
              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

              Comment


              • #22
                Cobb is 100% a lock. Michael Cohen of the Athletic says it's the best he has seen him in years.
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                  So... you.re telling me there's a chance. Yeah!!!
                  what was all that one in a million talk?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                    Cobb is 100% a lock. Michael Cohen of the Athletic says it's the best he has seen him in years.
                    so, 650 yards and 5 tds?

                    a real deal for the 12.7 he counts against the cap

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      FA year for Cobb so probably a huge season.
                      Originally posted by 3irty1
                      This is museum quality stupidity.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by red View Post
                        so, 650 yards and 5 tds?

                        a real deal for the 12.7 he counts against the cap
                        Didnt say he was worth the price just that he is a 100% lock.
                        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          How to afford Mack: https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/afford...-deep-dive-103
                          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Perry, a 1st and 3rd for Mack.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Oh boy. There have been rumblings for the past few weeks that the Raiders may consider trading star pass-rusher Khalil Mack if they can't come to an agreement in the near future. But those were rumblings and offseason chatter. Nothing moves the opinion of the public more…
                              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                                Perry, a 1st and 3rd for Mack.
                                Kizer was worth a former first-round pick. Why not save the D1 and force Oakland to take Kizer, Perry and your third instead?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X