This thread has pipe-dreams within it's pipe-dreams. Pipe-dreamception.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mack to Pack?
Collapse
X
-
I don't know how you can fault the logic that says Cobb isn't worth $10 mil per year, but the Raiders will love him at that price.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
I don't think the raiders would love him at that, but I think for last year of deal they could suck it up if they also gained picks. I also think he is a must go to sign mack long term. Plain and simple its where the most money for least production lies.Originally posted by pbmax View PostI don't know how you can fault the logic that says Cobb isn't worth $10 mil per year, but the Raiders will love him at that price.
He would be a throw in on the deal because we can't keep him and do the deal imo.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Cobb's contract is done after this year as is Matthews. If you let them both walk, you can definitely sign Mack because the money would start next season. You have a tougher time signing Rodgers though.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pbmax View PostI don't know how you can fault the logic that says Cobb isn't worth $10 mil per year, but the Raiders will love him at that price.
Why, it's the same logic that people use to suggest the Packers package a few unwanteds (too pricey, injury history, both, high-pick draft bust) plus a first rounder for Mack."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
It is not a very Green Bay move.Originally posted by red View Posttheres like a 1% of 1% chance of this ever happening
I wonder how Reggie White's contract in the 90s compares to the numbers Mack will require. Probably similar, adjusted for market.
I say pull the trigger. I won't get fired if it doesn't work out.
Comment
-
we didn't have to give up a ton in picks to sign reggieOriginally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostIt is not a very Green Bay move.
I wonder how Reggie White's contract in the 90s compares to the numbers Mack will require. Probably similar, adjusted for market.
I say pull the trigger. I won't get fired if it doesn't work out.
Comment


Comment