Tweet
Originally posted by pbmax
View Post
You are a frozen turkey.
-
2nd best post.
You are a frozen turkey. -
Rotoworld Football @Rotoworld_FB
Raiders slot WR Griff Whalen suffers turf toe https://t.co/MUrpHGvtOc
If only Montgomery were still healthy enough to trade.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
Moore, and 2 picks.Originally posted by pbmax View PostSwede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.Comment
-
Gruden doesn't want a rookie, unless he is in addition to two first round picks.Originally posted by Tony Oday View PostBud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
getting Mack is pie in the sky, I think. I read some vague thing today that said he might not cost as much as some think. I also read that he might go to Detroit. Rumors, rumors, rumors.
I'd offer Cobb and maybe a 3rd and a 4th round pick, something like that. Yeah, that's probably too little, but not getting him wouldn't be the end of the world either.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
I’d give them cm3 and next year’s firstThe measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.Comment
-
So they want our 1sts? Awesome! Do it. Jared Allen went to the Vikings for 1 1st, 2 3rds and a swap of a 6th. It would be nice to have a dominate Defensive player along side a fading dominate player, CMIII and an oft injured one in Perry.Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.Comment
-
Don't forget about New ReggieOriginally posted by Tony Oday View PostOriginally posted by 3irty1Comment
-
I'd give up our 2 1sts if we can work out a contract with Mack
But nothing more than the 2 firsts unless they want a WRTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
Why would they want another one of our WRs? They already have Jordy.Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
Oakland is not trading Mack. They would be idiots if they did.Comment
-
They would be bigger idiots if he sat out a year.Originally posted by Pugger View PostSwede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.Comment
-
the aaron donald contract should give us an idea of what they have to do to get mack...
Adam Schefter
Verified account
@AdamSchefter
Follow Follow @AdamSchefter
More
Long time coming: Rams and Aaron Donald finalizing a record 6-year, $135 million, including $87 million guaranteed, per source. Richest defensive deal in NFL history.
Donald now tied to LA for next seven years. And he will be ready for Monday night opener vs. Raiders.
Comment
-
There is no way in hell we can even compete with this.Originally posted by gbgary View PostComment
-
Mack probably won't get quite what Donald got: his skill set isn't as complete and interior linemen who can collapse the pocket the way Donald can are even rarer than edge rushers. But even if he did, the Packers could still swing it if they were willing to forgo other things, like re-signing Daniels. But your comment points to a good question: are the combined costs of acquiring and signing Mack (draft picks, salary cap, ability to re-sign their own) really worth it? If you put ARod and Mack on the 2017 Cleveland Browns, what kind of results would you expect? Personally I would prefer to see them play it out. If the Raiders' asking price drops considerably, make a move. Otherwise, hold onto your two D1s and hope a good edge rusher and a more durable replacement for Bulaga fall into your lap.Comment
-
To deal for Mack, the Packers would have to be willing to make him probably the highest-paid defensive player in the game. Can they afford to do that now?
The short answer is, yes, the Packers have the means to sign Mack if they want him and the Raiders are willing to deal.Comment
Comment