Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2018 Drafted Rookies....So Far

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2018 Drafted Rookies....So Far

    Jaire Alexander CB - Definitely belongs in the NFL as a starter. Could be a star.
    Josh Jackson CB - Definitely belongs in the NFL as a starter. Could be a star.
    Oren Burks ILB - Starter as a rookie due to injury, but not an embarrassment. Could be a long term starter.
    J'Mon Moore WR - Appears to have the presence of an NFL receiver. Doesn't look like a rookie even if his production looks like a rookie's. Could be a good long term compliment to Adams.
    Cole Madison OL - Incomplete. Hopefully know more about this story at some point.
    JK Scott P - If he can find consistency, he could be a steal. His leg strength is real.
    Marquez Valdes-Scantling WR - Has speed but haven't seen a lot of wiggle/body control. Hopefully that's just because he's thinking too much right now.
    Equanimeous St. Brown WR - Has speed but haven't seen enough to elevate him past the practice squad.
    James Looney DE - Haven't seen enough to elevate him past the practice squad.
    Hunter Bradley LS - Neck and neck with a nondrafted long snapper. Still worth a draft pick flyer in the 7th.
    Kendall Donnerson OLB - Made some plays against scrubs in pursuit during preseason. Too early to tell if he's Janis (plays well in preseason but not against top tier talent) or Gilbert (plays well in preseason and develops to be successful against top tier talent).

    By my count, that's 5 of the first six picks (with Madison being completely unknown) that appear to belong in the NFL as starters or better (projected). The others could develop as well, but so far there appears to be NFL talent in Gutey's first draft. Let's hope the trajectories hold for the first five, and the lower round flyers take the time they need to develop.
    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

  • #2
    one starter. most of the rest are situational or rotation guys this year.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
      Jaire Alexander CB - Definitely belongs in the NFL as a starter. Could be a star.
      Josh Jackson CB - Definitely belongs in the NFL as a starter. Could be a star.
      Oren Burks ILB - Starter as a rookie due to injury, but not an embarrassment. Could be a long term starter.
      J'Mon Moore WR - Appears to have the presence of an NFL receiver. Doesn't look like a rookie even if his production looks like a rookie's. Could be a good long term compliment to Adams.
      Cole Madison OL - Incomplete. Hopefully know more about this story at some point.
      JK Scott P - If he can find consistency, he could be a steal. His leg strength is real.
      Marquez Valdes-Scantling WR - Has speed but haven't seen a lot of wiggle/body control. Hopefully that's just because he's thinking too much right now.
      Equanimeous St. Brown WR - Has speed but haven't seen enough to elevate him past the practice squad.
      James Looney DE - Haven't seen enough to elevate him past the practice squad.
      Hunter Bradley LS - Neck and neck with a nondrafted long snapper. Still worth a draft pick flyer in the 7th.
      Kendall Donnerson OLB - Made some plays against scrubs in pursuit during preseason. Too early to tell if he's Janis (plays well in preseason but not against top tier talent) or Gilbert (plays well in preseason and develops to be successful against top tier talent).

      By my count, that's 5 of the first six picks (with Madison being completely unknown) that appear to belong in the NFL as starters or better (projected). The others could develop as well, but so far there appears to be NFL talent in Gutey's first draft. Let's hope the trajectories hold for the first five, and the lower round flyers take the time they need to develop.

      Good thread. I hope your analysis is correct.
      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

      KYPack

      Comment


      • #4
        If you get both CBs as good starters, Burks as good dime ILB, you have to consider the draft successful. It looks like there is a chance for that to happen so far

        if you get one more starter (even a LS) its an unqualified success.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
          If you get both CBs as good starters, Burks as good dime ILB, you have to consider the draft successful. It looks like there is a chance for that to happen so far

          if you get one more starter (even a LS) its an unqualified success.
          I think if both CBs end up starting together in GB in the next 2 years, and playing at a high level, it's a rousing success. Taking a position of weakness and making it a strength in 1 draft would be outstanding.
          Originally posted by 3irty1
          This is museum quality stupidity.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Zool View Post
            I think if both CBs end up starting together in GB in the next 2 years, and playing at a high level, it's a rousing success. Taking a position of weakness and making it a strength in 1 draft would be outstanding.
            Well, it would probably be two drafts - because to become a position of strength, Jones and King would also need to work out and be solid starters (talking about the entire secondary I guess, not just corners).
            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
              Well, it would probably be two drafts - because to become a position of strength, Jones and King would also need to work out and be solid starters.
              Good point. If all 4 work out, that's almost amazing. That's hitting on your first 2 draft picks in consecutive years with starters.
              Originally posted by 3irty1
              This is museum quality stupidity.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm hopeful, but I remember that Randall and Rollins both had pretty good rookie years.
                I can't run no more
                With that lawless crowd
                While the killers in high places
                Say their prayers out loud
                But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                A thundercloud
                They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                  I'm hopeful, but I remember that Randall and Rollins both had pretty good rookie years.
                  I was kind of thinking the same - in the last 4 drafts the Pack have taken a DB 3 times with their first 2 picks - 6 out of 8 picks. If they get it it's more of a case of 'about time' than 'good job'.
                  --
                  Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Zool View Post
                    I think if both CBs end up starting together in GB in the next 2 years, and playing at a high level, it's a rousing success. Taking a position of weakness and making it a strength in 1 draft would be outstanding.
                    Even if in the meantime what were once positions of strength (OL, WR) become unstable?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Are the Packers thinking/playing Josh Jones at safety now? How is he doing? Last year he was mostly an LB, so that's a bit surprising to someone who isn't following camp too closely.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
                        Are the Packers thinking/playing Josh Jones at safety now? How is he doing? Last year he was mostly an LB, so that's a bit surprising to someone who isn't following camp too closely.
                        He's had a quiet preseason. I think the plan was to play him mostly at Safety. However, the injury to Burks might get him some time as dime ILB.
                        I can't run no more
                        With that lawless crowd
                        While the killers in high places
                        Say their prayers out loud
                        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                        A thundercloud
                        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by hoosier View Post
                          Even if in the meantime what were once positions of strength (OL, WR) become unstable?
                          I think so. The secondary was a dumpster fire.
                          Originally posted by 3irty1
                          This is museum quality stupidity.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I agree. But the decline in talent and depth in recent years has affected more than just on e position group. You spend two drafts restocking the secondary and, even if you do it well, it is still kind of like sticking your finger in the dike. Presumably they won't need to devote two full drafts to redoing the offensive line, but in the meantime this team still has holes and will not survive major injuries at key positions the way they have in the past.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well they drafted 3WRs and brought in 2 TE's via FA this year plus Kendricks last year, so they've overhauled the WRs. As for the OL, I think they were counting on one of Murphy/Spriggs/Pankey to emerge...they seem to have a lot of interior linemen so I'm less concerned there. But yeah, tackle is a mess, especially with Bulaga's injury history. Maybe they thought Cole Madison could help there.

                              Spending so many picks on the secondary and the issue of 'opportunity cost' certainly is forum-worthy discussion. You can only get by with UDFA's and mid/low round picks in the secondary for so long.

                              I like this draft better than the Randall-Rollins picks. Seems like there's a chance of 3-4 guys being long term starters, but I'm going to play wait-and-see with the rookies.

                              I think the adage about needing 3 years to grade the draft is true, but for now it looks positive.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X