Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers vs Vikings rosters

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers vs Vikings rosters

    i caught part of doug gottlieb on his show yesterday talking about why a-rod hasn't won more super bowls. he basically said its because TT sucked as a GM

    he said the Vikings should show everyone this weekend just why the packers haven't won more SBs

    he refused to break things down, but he said, if you take the starters from both teams (22 players), and had to pick between the 2 to make 1 team, he would select 18 or 19 players from the Vikings, and only a few starters (including rodgers) from GB. he did say there might be a few guy that were close and up for debate, but overall, the Queens had the much better roster

    anyone want to break it down?

    (sending up the bat signal for patler)

  • #2
    Yawn.

    Comment


    • #3
      NVM

      just go to the other thread

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by red View Post
        i caught part of doug gottlieb on his show yesterday talking about why a-rod hasn't won more super bowls. he basically said its because TT sucked as a GM
        Too simple to just say "TT sucked", but I don't want to get into it.

        Bostick/Peppers/Burnett and injuries/bad luck probably cost them two (2011 and 2014).

        Great QBs, like Rodgers, Favre, Marino, sometimes sabotage their own chances by skewing draft position. Look at the teams that have waxed and waned as the Packers have stayed competitive.

        OK, now *Yawn*
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #5
          Brady is the exception, not the rule.
          Originally posted by 3irty1
          This is museum quality stupidity.

          Comment


          • #7
            Are Elfline and Compton still hurt? That would be a big difference.
            Originally posted by 3irty1
            This is museum quality stupidity.

            Comment


            • #8
              I've been saying for years that the Vikes are more talented... really don't think there is much of a debate here.

              As for TT - he was avg. to below avg. in player evaluation... a lot of us in here could have done better, as a lot of the players we wanted turned out better than TT's picks.

              Add to that his refusal to bring in veterans and you have a constantly churning roster that never gets to the top. 2010 was a fart in the wind, and he came close the year Stubby flubbed the game away in Seattle; but, overall his time as GM should be considered a failure.
              wist

              Comment


              • #9
                Originally posted by red View Post
                [doug gottlieb] said, if you take the starters from both teams (22 players), and had to pick between the 2 to make 1 team, he would select 18 or 19 players from the Vikings, and only a few starters (including rodgers) from GB. he did say there might be a few guy that were close and up for debate, but overall, the Queens had the much better roster
                Lazy evaluation from a basketball guy based on last season's records. The Vikings have a good team, but will not be in the Super Bowl this year and probably not in the next few years. Gottlieb lacks context in his understanding of the teams he was commenting on. He should have just shut the fuck up so he wouldn't be exposed as an ignorant cuckold.

                Comment


                • #10
                  1998, 2009, 2017. Next one should be somewhere in the late 2020s
                  Originally posted by 3irty1
                  This is museum quality stupidity.

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    Originally posted by red View Post
                    i caught part of doug gottlieb on his show yesterday talking about why a-rod hasn't won more super bowls. he basically said its because TT sucked as a GM

                    he said the Vikings should show everyone this weekend just why the packers haven't won more SBs

                    he refused to break things down, but he said, if you take the starters from both teams (22 players), and had to pick between the 2 to make 1 team, he would select 18 or 19 players from the Vikings, and only a few starters (including rodgers) from GB. he did say there might be a few guy that were close and up for debate, but overall, the Queens had the much better roster

                    anyone want to break it down?

                    (sending up the bat signal for patler)
                    I watched our shitty D hold them to what? 13 points was it late last season with no Rodgers. I think people over react to the eminently shitty TT. If TT had resigned Micah Hyde and Casey Heyward He would be a genius. Go ahead and match up TTs drafts vs. the Vikings. If MM weren't such an imbecile we definitely would have made one more superbowl, and if Dom had schooled his D on playing the read option at all we would probably have been in yet another.
                    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      I think the talent drain from drafting high is real and the only defense against it is to petition the League to switch to the AFC South.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • #13
                        The Patriots and possibly some other teams have done just fine building all around quality even though they consistently draft near the bottom. Ted shoulda done a helluva lot better.
                        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                        Comment


                        • #14
                          Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                          The Patriots and possibly some other teams have done just fine building all around quality even though they consistently draft near the bottom. Ted shoulda done a helluva lot better.
                          I’m always perplexed by what this ‘’considerably”’ better means. Only NE did considerably better than the Packers over TT’s run.

                          I too would have liked a couple more Superbowls wins but l argue that it wasn’t really a TT failing. But no more from me; this becomes tiresome.
                          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                          Comment


                          • #15
                            What I get tired of is people judging Aaron Rodgers by lack of Super Bowls won or played in - when that CLEARLY is the result of mediocre talent around him. And that definitely is a "TT failing".
                            What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X