Tweet
Is this new rule because of the Barr/Rodgers hit last year?
-
After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned. -
Originally posted by pbmax View Post
The entire rule is a fucking joke. Period.
The fact we are discussing the nuance of guy falling down on a hit proves it.Comment
-
I see no penalty there.Comment
-
God I hate weeks like this. I get so fucking pissed. This will bug me and keep me up way too late.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim HarmstonComment
-
I actually thought the Vikings played a better game than the Packers and we were lucky to escape with a tie.Comment
-
Horseshit callThe measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.Comment
-
Exactly. I felt the same way.Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
Here the Packers are playing the Vikings, huge game, and I literally didn't care at that point.Comment
-
-
Nope. See image post below from the Ref and Demovsky.Originally posted by HowardRoark View PostBud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
Speaking of rules, early in the game Cousins through a deep ball that the receiver was no where near (he had run the wrong route). Cousins was under pressure and inside the tackles; why isn't that grounding?
For the record, I don't think it should have be grounding......but it seems to have been within all the definitions of the rule.After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.Comment
-
From Wilde's Twitter feed:
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
There was one play that the refs said he was under no pressure, so no intentional grounding. But I don't remember which play it was.Originally posted by HowardRoark View PostSpeaking of rules, early in the game Cousins through a deep ball that the receiver was no where near (he had run the wrong route). Cousins was under pressure and inside the tackles; why isn't that grounding?
For the record, I don't think it should have be grounding......but it seems to have been within all the definitions of the rule.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
That's how I read the explanation too......but the new rule that we are alluding to; is that because of Barr?Originally posted by pbmax View Post
That would have sucked to have that hit cost us a season and now a game this season too.After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.Comment
-
Packers were better through halftime and most of 3rd. Gave up the long TD and that completely changed the game.Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
Packer offense was no great shakes after half though.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
Awful call and the explanation is even worse. Clay lifted him? Try againGo PACKComment
Comment