Nick Perry Robbery

[red]

He played 14 games this year and according to PFF he did pretty well. He’ll be back since 8M for a RT is quite affordable.

But how many games did he actually finish? And how many plays did he miss? Cause he missed a lot of time this year

[gbgary]

bulaga was not a problem this season. pff and espn both ranked the Packers o-line number one in pass protection. the problem is o-line depth. our cap situation and poor drafting have left the o-line shelf bare. that will continue...cap-wise anyway. fingers crossed on drafting.

[pbmax]

Right. Bulaga and Bach both had the type of year where you needed good depth.

[gbgary]

But how many games did he actually finish? And how many plays did he miss? Cause he missed a lot of time this year

he had 250 fewer snaps than Bak. that's more than i thought for playing in 14 games.

[gbgary]

Right. Bulaga and Bach both had the type of year where you needed good depth.

every o-line needs some depth. guys are going to miss games and chunks of plays. Bak's been durable. he's had 4 seasons with over 1000 snaps. look at the cowboys o-line. they've had a great deal of turnover the past 4 years but are still good.

[texaspackerbacker]

That's absolutely unbelievable that pff and espn would rate the Packers O Line that high. It must have a lot to do with Rodgers' escapability bailing them out for shitty pass blocking and letting pass rushers through.

It's absolutely incredible also that the same wrongheaded fools ragging on Aaron Rodgers are defending the observable sorry performance of the O Line.

[pbmax]

every o-line needs some depth. guys are going to miss games and chunks of plays. Bak's been durable. he's had 4 seasons with over 1000 snaps. look at the cowboys o-line. they've had a great deal of turnover the past 4 years but are still good.

Bach has been durable except for the two seasons he was banged up and needed help. He came out of a few games this year and better depth probably gets him time to heal on the bench.

[gbgary]

That's absolutely unbelievable that pff and espn would rate the Packers O Line that high. It must have a lot to do with Rodgers' escapability bailing them out for shitty pass blocking and letting pass rushers through.

It's absolutely incredible also that the same wrongheaded fools ragging on Aaron Rodgers are defending the observable sorry performance of the O Line.

i don't know what their grading parameters are. i'm sure there's a time clock involved. probably how long they hold their blocks, pressures and sacks given up, etc. Rodgers' escapability is a plus but his holding the ball too long makes the o-line eyeball test look bad when it's not so much.

[gbgary]

Bach has been durable except for the two seasons he was banged up and needed help. He came out of a few games this year and better depth probably gets him time to heal on the bench.

absolutely.

[red]

he had 250 fewer snaps than Bak. that's more than i thought for playing in 14 games.

Yeah, Bulaga missed over 27% of the offensive snaps this year

And probably played when he was too hurt to be out there another 25% of the time

And unfortunately, that’s about par for the course with him. He had one 15 game year and one 16 game year, all the rest have been injury plagued

So even though he is good when he’s healthy, you pretty much need to carry another starting tackle on the team for when he does get hurt, because it will happen

[red]

Bach has been durable except for the two seasons he was banged up and needed help. He came out of a few games this year and better depth probably gets him time to heal on the bench.

I mentioned to pugger in another thread that the poor fucker couldn’t even get off the field a few weeks ago because both legs were shot, he just stood there trying to get them to work

He might have missed one series, that’s it. He couldn’t come out because we didn’t have a replacement

So him standing there unable to move was our best option at tackle

I’ll never question that big bastards toughness after watching that

[gbgary]

this! ^

[Bossman641]

Let's be realistic...OL depth would be nice but there's a severe shortage of quality linemen in the NFL. It's unrealistic to expect depth across the line IMO. Game plan needs to go to quick passing.

[pbmax]

Very true which is why I would BPA all positions. The only one I would trade up for or reach is pass rush but have to be certain.

In the first round anyway.

Otherwise, BPA.

[red]

Very true which is why I would BPA all positions. The only one I would trade up for or reach is pass rush but have to be certain.

In the first round anyway.

Otherwise, BPA.

and pass rusher at the top of the first round is about a big of a gamble as there is. its like 50/50 that the guy becomes a star or a dud