Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Banjo: Week 15 @ Chicago

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by pbmax View Post
    Bulaga?
    Yes.
    C.H.U.D.

    Comment


    • #32
      I really like Bulaga and because our OL has went from Tarzan to Jane I think I'd try to bring him back at a somewhat reduced salary...before cutting him.
      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

      Comment


      • #33
        I am pretty sure Bulaga is done. Even healthy he wasn't certain anymore.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
          I am pretty sure Bulaga is done. Even healthy he wasn't certain anymore.
          And Rodgers? I don't know how long he's gonna' be effective......

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
            In today's NFL often logic runs against sitting the QB long.

            Huge competitive advantage if you can make a SB run while the QB is on the rookie deal.

            Having Russell Wilson for very very cheap allowed Seattle to have all of that talent and win the big show. Tom Brady giving NE a hometown discount has really helped NE win over the years. This year we have Goff and Mahomes and it looks like the Rams and Chiefs are set up nicely to win a SB over the next few years.

            and shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh; know who else looks to be setting themselves up nicely ????

            DA BEARS. 2nd year QB, new innovative coach, has used free agency and trades as well as a few good drafts to stack the talent....they kinda look like they've built their roster and are a year behind the Rams

            In today's QB run world you can sit a QB for a year....but you wanna get him in asap.
            There’s a lot of truth in this scenario, and there is a competitive advantage to having a young QB start, but it was the same 13 years ago when Rodgers was drafted. At that time, Favre was one of the highest paid QBs and Rodgers was on a very expensive rookie deal. We still made it work and Rodgers had the advantage of 3 years of experience leaving us with little drop off when he took over. I’m still in favor of drafting his replacement...and soon.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by pbmax View Post
              I am pretty sure Bulaga is done. Even healthy he wasn't certain anymore.
              I agree he's gone at his current price but I doubt you're signing a vet RT anyway, so I'd let him come back and compete for a starting spot with a rookie. If he wins out, you're better off. When he gets hurt, well, that is the rookie starter than as planned. Best case is the rookie beats him out and it's moot.

              Comment


              • #37
                Rob DemovskyESPN Staff Writer

                Looking deeper into Aaron Rodgers' day. He was: 4-of-12 passing 10-plus yards downfield -- his first game without a TD on such throws since Week 4 vs. Buffalo. 1-of-9 passing 20-plus yards downfield. 8-of-12 for 119 yards to Davante Adams. 6-of-14 for 54 yards to all other wide receivers.
                All the talk about the great Bears defense, yet if Rodgers had been accurate yesterday, we might be talking about how the packers put up 31 points on that defense. The Bears put pressure on you, but they also leave things out there that can be exploited. It's takes an accurate QB to exploit them. Can this be fixed, or is Rodgers' body starting to fail him?
                I can't run no more
                With that lawless crowd
                While the killers in high places
                Say their prayers out loud
                But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                A thundercloud
                They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                  All the talk about the great Bears defense, yet if Rodgers had been accurate yesterday, we might be talking about how the packers put up 31 points on that defense. The Bears put pressure on you, but they also leave things out there that can be exploited. It's takes an accurate QB to exploit them. Can this be fixed, or is Rodgers' body starting to fail him?
                  Yep, the game was there for them to win. As were some other games where Rodgers was not especially sharp. You do have to hope it's due to injury and that he can recover. You don't need otherworly Rodgers, but you probably need at least 90-95%. Maybe some of the offseason effort in coaching and personnel could be directed at reducing the level of Rodgers' comepetency required for wins.

                  It is obvious though to everyone that the most effective way to stop Rodgers and the Packers is to injure him early on in the season. Chicago is 1-2 and Vikings are 1-1 in this strategy.
                  "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Since all we're left with is thinking of next year, I wonder, since I did not get the game here, if anyone can say anything about the performances of Mt. Adams, Josh Jackson, and Josh Jones yesterday. We need two of those three to really pan out if we're hoping this will be a one-season rebuild. Also, did Oren Burks play at all?
                    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                    KYPack

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                      In today's NFL often logic runs against sitting the QB long.

                      Huge competitive advantage if you can make a SB run while the QB is on the rookie deal.

                      Having Russell Wilson for very very cheap allowed Seattle to have all of that talent and win the big show. Tom Brady giving NE a hometown discount has really helped NE win over the years. This year we have Goff and Mahomes and it looks like the Rams and Chiefs are set up nicely to win a SB over the next few years.

                      and shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh; know who else looks to be setting themselves up nicely ????

                      DA BEARS. 2nd year QB, new innovative coach, has used free agency and trades as well as a few good drafts to stack the talent....they kinda look like they've built their roster and are a year behind the Rams

                      In today's QB run world you can sit a QB for a year....but you wanna get him in asap.
                      Once the Bears have to pay their QB they won't be able to keep all those goodies on defense either.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                        Once the Bears have to pay their QB they won't be able to keep all those goodies on defense either.
                        Trubisky aint worth all that much. That's why they brought in Mack. They know they have to win with defense and an 'efficient' offense.
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                          Trubisky aint worth all that much. That's why they brought in Mack. They know they have to win with defense and an 'efficient' offense.
                          I laugh when I think of what they paid for that QB in that draft.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                            Since all we're left with is thinking of next year, I wonder, since I did not get the game here, if anyone can say anything about the performances of Mt. Adams, Josh Jackson, and Josh Jones yesterday. We need two of those three to really pan out if we're hoping this will be a one-season rebuild. Also, did Oren Burks play at all?
                            All three had their good moments (The packers had one sack and one QB hit - the sack went to Clay and the hit to Adams), but Jones gave help late on an easy TD over Brown (that might have mostly been Brown's fault), Adams got pushed around pretty good in 16 plays, and Jackson looked silly a couple of times. Jackson is salvageable, especially if he can play safety. Jones is too, but only as a SS I think. Adams is just a rotation guy. Burks got no defensive snaps at all. On the bright side, James Looney looked like an All-pro in his one snap. He already understands how to conserve energy for critical plays.
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I got to hand it to Tramon Wiliams - that guy is just a solid pro. Played every snap again on defense.
                              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                                I laugh when I think of what they paid for that QB in that draft.
                                Sure, but they're being super smart with how they use him. He threw deep twice yesterday and completed one for 23 yards. Packers threw deep 10 times and completed 2 for 44.

                                They don't need the deep game to win; Packers do.
                                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X