Antonio brown?

[pbmax]

Well the Steelers are really good at hiding onto high end talent this year, I mean LeVeon had a great....wait....

We really are reaching late stage Bert. Soon we will know that there have been calls between Rodgers and Brown. And the shortcomings of the young ones at WR will suddenly get lots of quotes in the newspapers.

[pbmax]

I know! Trade Damarious Randall for him.

Oh, wait. Never mind. MM threw a fit LAST year, so they traded Randall for a useless third-string QB.

So trade Kizer for Brown. Also don't forget the training camp trade of Josh Sitton.

[George Cumby]

And now I’m convinced that his move would be the smartest thing this team ever did

I'd love to agree with you here, but then I'd be agreeing with Tank. What's a discerning PackerRat to do? I do declare!

[mraynrand]

I'd love to agree with you here, but then I'd be agreeing with Tank. What's a discerning PackerRat to do? I do declare!

Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!

[red]

Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!

Mono........doh!

[pbmax]

I am going to endorse this as long as the cost isn't more than a second. Would prefer to third, mostly to stick it to the Steelers.

Packers are very short of attitude guys and decent, frustrated quotes after the game.

Plus he's not a bad sideline threat.

[Fritz]

You're losing the narrative already, and Stubby hasn't been gone for even a year. Monty was shipped due to Stubby's pique, Randall was traded because the team captains insisted on it.

So it's the team captains' fault that the Packers got nothing for a starting safety?

This means it's the team captains' fault that the Packers don't have Antonio Brown.

Who are these clowns?

[mraynrand]

So it's the team captains' fault that the Packers got nothing for a starting safety?

This means it's the team captains' fault that the Packers don't have Antonio Brown.

Who are these clowns?

Oh, you want to focus on the second part of the narrative. That part says that all the front office talent went to Cleveland and left the Packers with the scraps. That's why Monkey went to lovely Cleveland instead as well. Face it, it's over.

[pbmax]

OK, I am going over the the Bucks board.

Someone should start a Premier League board so we can post at 4:30 in the morning about the beautiful game.

[run pMc]

He's better than Amari Cooper, so you have to think PIT will want at least what OAK got for Cooper (R1 pick).
Brown is set to make something like $11+M next year, I don't see them trading a R1 for an uppity 32 year old WR, not with the young guys they have. MVS and ESB showed promise, G-Mo comes back, and the M4 offense might actually play to some of J'Mon's strengths.

I think they will look at Cobb on a cheap contract or someone younger/cheaper, or maybe just draft a jitterbug small-school slot receiver in R5.

[red]

He's better than Amari Cooper, so you have to think PIT will want at least what OAK got for Cooper (R1 pick).
Brown is set to make something like $11+M next year, I don't see them trading a R1 for an uppity 32 year old WR, not with the young guys they have. MVS and ESB showed promise, G-Mo comes back, and the M4 offense might actually play to some of J'Mon's strengths.

I think they will look at Cobb on a cheap contract or someone younger/cheaper, or maybe just draft a jitterbug small-school slot receiver in R5.

why? why even bring cobb or clay back even for the minimum?

those 2 have been complete shit for years, they aren't even worth the minimum, GET RID OF THE SHIT ON THIS TEAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[pbmax]

why? why even bring cobb or clay back even for the minimum?

those 2 have been complete shit for years, they aren't even worth the minimum, GET RID OF THE SHIT ON THIS TEAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Both could contribute, especially Cobb in the new offense. But it would have to be at a discount. Veteran depth. Not veteran minimum like Jordy, but not too far above.

Might be harder with Matthews because he can still move and someone will convince themselves that he can still rush the passer.

[KYPack]

I'd love to agree with you here, but then I'd be agreeing with Tank. What's a discerning PackerRat to do? I do declare!

I'm at those same crossroads.

I support brother Red and his think outside the bottle suggestion that the GBP make some bold moves.

One of the problems in doing that is who is gonna fashion said bold moves?

Our new child coach?

Mark "megalomaniac" Murphy?

Or Goot, who's big FA acquisition was Jimmy Graham crackers?

No, I've lost a lot of faith in these question mark fellows. Who can lead us out of our wasteland?

Let's hire Joe Lombardi and have him lead the NFL's first Spirit Squad.

Something, anything.

[red]

Both could contribute, especially Cobb in the new offense. But it would have to be at a discount. Veteran depth. Not veteran minimum like Jordy, but not too far above.

Might be harder with Matthews because he can still move and someone will convince themselves that he can still rush the passer.

by keeping both players you have prevented yourself from moving on

if cobb was gone would we have kept the better option in jordy last season? or invest some higher draft picks at WR before the last draft?

if we got rid of clay, would we actually try and draft a OLB in one of the first 2 rounds since we spent the pick on perry? or sign a free agent replacement that can show up for more then 2 or 3 games a year and then just vanish?

these guys on the team have probably prevented us from finding something better. "we have a #2 WR in cobb and a pass rush threat in mathews. they were both once good a half a decade ago, we can focus on other areas"

[red]

I'm at those same crossroads.

I support brother Red and his think outside the bottle suggestion that the GBP make some bold moves.

One of the problems in doing that is who is gonna fashion said bold moves?

bears made one bold move that we didn't make last year and completely energized that team