Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bobbles Offseason Position group breakdown: Running backs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bobbles Offseason Position group breakdown: Running backs

    What can go right: Laflavor uses the position the way successful coaches have been using it for the last 5 years. Jones shows he has the ability to run a route and make things happen after the catch. Williams stuns me by being much better in the pass catching role than he is in the running role. Packers take a back in the first round for first time since Brent Fulwood.

    If only we had a running back who used to play receiver and was really efficient at running routes...where could we find someone like that? I expect we take a back in the first 2 rounds this year. I don't expect to sink the cash it would take for Leveon Bell, but there are guys who are serviceable...besides, I still think the line makes the back. Don't believe me...ask CJ Anderson.

    What could go wrong: Jones is a great runner, but doesn't have the hands it takes for this role. Williams continues to run into his OL instead of the holes. We try to draft a guy in the 6th round thinking he will be the next Terrell Davis.

    This is a position group I could see going either way more than any other. We just don't know enough about Jones and Williams as receivers and Gutes might just decide that the young guys will fill the role. And if we don't fix the OL, its unlikely anyone will have great success running the ball.

    Bottom line: I think we will be ok. The scheme will provide for some opportunities for whoever we line up to make some catches and move chains. I am such a fan of the ZBS done correctly I wanted Gary Kubiak for a head coach just so I could see it done correctly. Hopefully LaFlavor gets it right and coaches it up. I'll be watching the OL a lot closer than the RB's, but that is discussion for another thread.
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

  • #2
    Sheeeesh! A running back in the first round? You've got to be kidding. The 6th round if at all is about right. They should all be used as a change of pace anyway. Nothing wrong with throwing to the backs once in a while if the situation calls for it. Williams already has done a good job catching passes, and Jones hasn't shown anything to be negative about. The greater need is for them to be able to pass block when, as is inevitable, the O Line springs a leak.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

    Comment


    • #3
      There don't appear to be any RB's this year who are a candidate to be drafted as high as #12. After that, anything is possible. Jones is dynamic, but has shown a penchant for knee sprains.
      I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd prefer we use our 2 first round draft picks on another position rather than RB.

        Comment


        • #5
          Too negative about Jones and Williams. They work as a pair with different strengths and weaknesses so should fit same scheme. They do enough well to be very good. Injuries for Jones are a concern.

          So need a backup. Which is why the trade of Monty was dumb.
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by pbmax View Post
            Too negative about Jones and Williams. They work as a pair with different strengths and weaknesses so should fit same scheme. They do enough well to be very good. Injuries for Jones are a concern.

            So need a backup. Which is why the trade of Monty was dumb.
            I have been wondering why we traded Ty. I have a hard time believing it was because of that boneheaded move in LA last season. Was he too a malcontent along with Ha Ha and D. Randall? If so things were a lot worse in that locker room that folks in GB are letting on.

            Comment


            • #7
              I would agree that he was a malcontent.....
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                I would agree that he was a malcontent.....
                Possibly he was a bit malcontent, hard to say from outside looking in. I think MM was in survival mode and he has scapegoated players before.

                I would be malcontent if I came in as a WR, changed positions for the good of the team, but probably detriment to my career and all my coach kept saying was "PASS BLOCK BETTER" and never had me run any routes.

                Again, hard to say from outside, no question MM ran a tight ship with attitudes. Shipped out Sitton with a relatively cheap year left on his contract at 11th hour. Cut Bostic after mismanaging game (but Bostic did try to play hero instead of his role).Maybe Monty was a bit chippy, but maybe MM is thin skinned also. In todays game you have to be a leader of young men and get the best out of them while managing egos and attitudes. MM lost his ability to do that in the latter stages.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                  Possibly he was a bit malcontent, hard to say from outside looking in. I think MM was in survival mode and he has scapegoated players before.

                  I would be malcontent if I came in as a WR, changed positions for the good of the team, but probably detriment to my career and all my coach kept saying was "PASS BLOCK BETTER" and never had me run any routes.

                  Again, hard to say from outside, no question MM ran a tight ship with attitudes. Shipped out Sitton with a relatively cheap year left on his contract at 11th hour. Cut Bostic after mismanaging game (but Bostic did try to play hero instead of his role).Maybe Monty was a bit chippy, but maybe MM is thin skinned also. In todays game you have to be a leader of young men and get the best out of them while managing egos and attitudes. MM lost his ability to do that in the latter stages.

                  It always seeems strange that Montgomery suddenly got tagged as a malcontent after one play in one game. Normally, those kinds of players grumble enough publicly that we get a sense of who they are. But not a peep about Monty. Hell, he did Clubhouse live for a while. Seemed articulate and personable.
                  "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                  KYPack

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                    It always seeems strange that Montgomery suddenly got tagged as a malcontent after one play in one game. Normally, those kinds of players grumble enough publicly that we get a sense of who they are. But not a peep about Monty. Hell, he did Clubhouse live for a while. Seemed articulate and personable.
                    Dix made more sense, not only for what they got for him, but also the reason.

                    Sitton made slightly more sense (griping in the offseason about the predictable offense) but the timing was very strange.

                    Monty was a scapegoat job all the way.

                    I agree, McCarthy was getting distracted by things he shouldn't have been thinking about. He needed a scheme or play calling rethink, not to move up to Junior GM.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ty shouldn't have spoken (or at least said much) to reporters after the Rams game...that would have saved him. Speaking publicly like he did -- and then having the unnamed player(s) talking to Mike Silver -- was a bad look overall. There was no way he could stay on the team -- he'd be a pariah in the locker room.

                      Pass pro did not come naturally to him, and M3 rarely seemed to use him correctly anyway.

                      As for Jones/Williams, I think they are capable duo. Williams needs to run with more patience and he'll be fine, Jones needs to stay healthy. I could see them taking a flier on somebody, but I'd be surprised if they spend anything higher than a Day 3 pick on a RB unless it's someone who fell significantly on draft day. I wouldn't be against them bringing in a bunch of guys to fight for the 3rd RB spot and maybe replace one or the other of Williams/Jones when their contracts expire.

                      Alvin Kamara and James White were major pass catching weapons yesterday, and even Damien Williams was doing damage. Gurley's been a machine all year -- successful offenses are using RBs in the passing game, sometimes (gasp!) even featuring them as 1st reads.
                      Plenty of teams lack LBs who can cover; M3 didn't exploit that enough, and it seems like it would be easier to do vs., say, finding a TE who can both block, catch, and run.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I will say that I wouldn't be upset if Bryce Love is sitting there in R3 or 4 and the Packers take him. Can run the Shanahan outside zone, looks like he can catch, and if he gets a step he's gone. No idea if he can pass pro, but I wouldn't use him for that. You could have him return kicks too.
                        He's a bigger Tarik Cohen and a matchup problem if used correctly.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by run pMc View Post
                          successful offenses are using RBs in the passing game, sometimes (gasp!) even featuring them as 1st reads.
                          Plenty of teams lack LBs who can cover; M3 didn't exploit that enough, and it seems like it would be easier to do vs., say, finding a TE who can block, catch, and run.
                          Good point
                          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Just go ahead and sign Kareem Hunt. He will be rested and ready after serving half the season on suspension and give this team a real boost headed into the home stretch.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Good article that shows Williams blocking acumen.
                              The fullback position may be diminishing, but when you have a running back that can run, catch, and pass block like Williams, why not put your best assets on the field?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X