Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Goodbye Nick Perry

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Goodbye Nick Perry

    Everyone will always remember that you didn't really want to play OLB for seven years and 2 contracts. Even if it wasn't true.

    Jason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora
    Packers are releasing Nick Perry after agreeing to terms Preston Smith and ZaDarius Smith. Was set to make $11M this season. Will b e a market for him for sure. Young enough and is healthy after battling injuries in 2018
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  • #2
    And this play:


    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #3
      Ah, I liked Perry. I have to admit though that he did seem to get injured quite a bit.

      The JSO article on all the signings says the Packers have indicated they're going to release Perry, but the article also says it seems "Highly unlikely" now that they'll re-sign Clay Matthews. Geez. He's a bit of a security blanket. I'd like to see them re-sign him and move him inside.
      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

      KYPack

      Comment


      • #4
        If you're evaluating Ted Thompson draft busts purely on outcome I think there is a case that Nick Perry is his worst ever pick. While other picks have done less for the Packers, none have done so little for so long for such a cost. Perry's career is a near optimization on how to keep expectations high while contributing as little as possible over the course of seven years. Would the Packers not have been better off had Perry flamed out quickly like Harrell or Sherrod? At that point they are down the opportunity cost of a 1st round pick and a rookie signing bonus. Instead he showed just enough at every point to keep the Packers investing in him as an important part of their defensive plans while always falling short of expectations except of course in contract years. I'm not saying he's intentionally a con man but everyone knows he's going to rack up a dozen sacks this year for some team and seduce them into a another 40 million dollar commitment right?
        70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by 3irty1 View Post
          If you're evaluating Ted Thompson draft busts purely on outcome I think there is a case that Nick Perry is his worst ever pick. While other picks have done less for the Packers, none have done so little for so long for such a cost. Perry's career is a near optimization on how to keep expectations high while contributing as little as possible over the course of seven years. Would the Packers not have been better off had Perry flamed out quickly like Harrell or Sherrod? At that point they are down the opportunity cost of a 1st round pick and a rookie signing bonus. Instead he showed just enough at every point to keep the Packers investing in him as an important part of their defensive plans while always falling short of expectations except of course in contract years. I'm not saying he's intentionally a con man but everyone knows he's going to rack up a dozen sacks this year for some team and seduce them into a another 40 million dollar commitment right?
          This.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 3irty1 View Post
            If you're evaluating Ted Thompson draft busts purely on outcome I think there is a case that Nick Perry is his worst ever pick. While other picks have done less for the Packers, none have done so little for so long for such a cost. Perry's career is a near optimization on how to keep expectations high while contributing as little as possible over the course of seven years. Would the Packers not have been better off had Perry flamed out quickly like Harrell or Sherrod? At that point they are down the opportunity cost of a 1st round pick and a rookie signing bonus. Instead he showed just enough at every point to keep the Packers investing in him as an important part of their defensive plans while always falling short of expectations except of course in contract years. I'm not saying he's intentionally a con man but everyone knows he's going to rack up a dozen sacks this year for some team and seduce them into a another 40 million dollar commitment right?
            You know I despise the fishmongers, so I'm cool with Perry milking them somewhat. I wish I, a burger-flipper could milk my fishy employers out of 40 million frogskins- alas, I still flip burgers literally AND figuratively.

            What's uncool is, hiphop safety Harrison Smith fell to Todd like the Great Arm of Butte did in 05, and Todd still took the 43 DE to play OLB in a 34.

            Collins was just KIA-ed in the arena. Peprah or Banjo or McMillan or Earl Little or some other wanker started games at the free. Smith would've been glorious in the Green and Gold.
            Last edited by Guest; 03-12-2019, 02:02 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Btw, did someone say in the other thread that Claymaker will be back? If true, my pal Nutz is gonna be pissed as fuck.

              Myself, I'd be jolly as fuck.

              Comment


              • #8
                They save almost no money this year by releasing him

                So the team just wanted him gone

                Does this mean anything? Like the team knows they are able to sign someone else? Or does it just mean perry sucked?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Good luck Nate.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by red View Post
                    They save almost no money this year by releasing him

                    So the team just wanted him gone

                    Does this mean anything? Like the team knows they are able to sign someone else? Or does it just mean perry sucked?
                    The Packers could save $3.3 million against the cap by releasing him now or $10.7 million if they release him with the June 2 designation. It does save them some money to use elsewhere.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by pbmax View Post

                      Jason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora
                      Will b e a market for him for sure. Young enough and is healthy after battling injuries in 2018
                      And 2017,2016,2015,2014, 2013,2012. Dude missed games every year and even most of the years he played 14-15 games he was hindered by nagging stuff wearing braces/clubs etc., leaving games early it seemed. Talented player, but I just don't think he could ever establish much momentum. Always dinged up. I could see him getting a one year show me type deal for 7 mil or so. Good luck Nick.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by red View Post
                        They save almost no money this year by releasing him

                        So the team just wanted him gone

                        Does this mean anything? Like the team knows they are able to sign someone else? Or does it just mean perry sucked?
                        No, they save cash because he is due a bonus AND they can designate some of the pro-ration to next year.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Bad take.

                          Packer Report
                          Going through Scouting Combine lunch convo with Gutekunst now. Just saw @RobDemovsky's brilliant question to Gutey about Nick Perry. I'm not even sure it was a question. Something along lines of, "You can't pay him that."


                          Heard this Q&A and Gutey was far more hesitant on this than Demovsky. To me this suggests if they did not get two OLB targets, he might have been back.
                          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            If they release him with a "Post June 1 designation", they will gain more cap space later in the year for the draft class.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by red View Post
                              They save almost no money this year by releasing him

                              So the team just wanted him gone

                              Does this mean anything? Like the team knows they are able to sign someone else? Or does it just mean perry sucked?
                              Has it gotten to the point where 3.3 million is almost no money?
                              I can't run no more
                              With that lawless crowd
                              While the killers in high places
                              Say their prayers out loud
                              But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                              A thundercloud
                              They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X