Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official 2019 Pick The Packers Win/Loss Record Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 9
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 6 7 8 9 template Next
  • #121
    Tex, I hope your 13 -3 comes true. Let's not have to suffer some ridiculous loss next week.

    Man, was I ever wrong about this team. The Smith Brothers really changed the calculus.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment

    • #122
      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
      Tex, I hope your 13 -3 comes true. Let's not have to suffer some ridiculous loss next week.

      Man, was I ever wrong about this team. The Smith Brothers really changed the calculus.
      You misspelled Fackrell, but he doesn't mind.

      Also Savage helps. I would comment on another DB's health but I'm not gonna jinx this thing now.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment

      • #123
        Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
        Cheesehead Craig, RashanGary, Rutnstrut, smuggler, Tony Oday, Upnorth have been officially eliminated.



        It's Tex vs pbmax.
        Glad I was wrong this way
        All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

        George Orwell

        Comment

        • #124
          Originally posted by Fritz View Post
          Tex, I hope your 13 -3 comes true. Let's not have to suffer some ridiculous loss next week.

          Man, was I ever wrong about this team. The Smith Brothers really changed the calculus.
          Is it possible a new found commitment to the run game that keeps offenses off the field and defenses on the field causing more manageable downs and distances had something to do with it as well? Its not always JUST about the points scored by an offense, sometimes its which D gets gassed first.
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment

          • #125
            Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
            Is it possible a new found commitment to the run game that keeps offenses off the field and defenses on the field causing more manageable downs and distances had something to do with it as well? Its not always JUST about the points scored by an offense, sometimes its which D gets gassed first.
            I think the D is playing well enough to get them the lead. Which the normally zero turnover offense can hang on to.

            The Packers have led in TOP by more than a minute in 9 of 15 games. When leading TOP? 7-2 or 77.8%

            When even (Oakland, Wash)? 2-0, 100%

            When losing TOP (NYG, Denver, Chicago, LAC)? 3-1, 75%

            There was a writeup of TOP recently, I think I posted it, that the evidence that the D gets more tired is very thin,
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment

            • #126
              The defense played like crap for 8 or 9 weeks in the middle of the season, but we still won most of those games. Now, they seem to be back where they should be, although I still have doubts about our pass coverage if the pass rush doesn't get home.

              TOP is a good thing, but not essential, as your stats show, pbmax.

              I have always considered lack of turnovers the primary good thing, but the Viking game proves we can even win a game with a few turnovers. The run game - and by extrapolation, the decency of the O Line compared to what they used to be - has helped a lot. I always said, if we had a O Line and RB(s) like the Badgers, I'd be all for running a lot more. Well, to some extent we do. And we still have the GOAT QB who can take over as needed. I wonder, though, if Lane Taylor hadn't been injured if Jenkins would have languished on the bench, and the whole season woulda been worse.

              What we still need to prove is that we can win a game against a team with a dominating pass rush. The Bears and Vikings should have been good, but as good as the Niners and Chargers? I don't know.

              Bottom line, the Packers seem to be peaking at the right time, and the top rival teams, some anyway, seem to be fading.
              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

              Comment

              • #127
                We have a winner!
                Congratulations Tex!!
                Drinking the Kool-aid pays off!

                I can't run no more
                With that lawless crowd
                While the killers in high places
                Say their prayers out loud
                But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                A thundercloud
                They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                Comment

                • #128
                  Came real close to 12-3-1 which I have been predicting for a decade.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment

                  • #129

                    Comment

                    • #130
                      Do we start a playoff prediction poll??
                      The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                      Vince Lombardi

                      "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                      Comment

                      Previous 1 6 7 8 9 template Next
                      Working...
                      X