If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If they’re playing man to man, it’s the softest man to man I’ve ever seen. The defender is trailing the receiver by 3 yards or the receiver catches the ball in the middle with no defender in the picture. I don’t have access to the coaches film, but on a lot of plays we had no defender following a motion man. That usually signifies zone. If Romo said they were mainly playing man to man, that coverage is very puzzling...and very poor.
Those crossing routes are designed to defeat man to man. If they have time and get past the underneath defender (even in man to man, ILBs often take drops if no receiver needs to be accounted for) its hard to defense in man to man.
Pass rush wasn't getting home.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
But is the pass rush not getting home because the line is playing more conservatively, thinking about filling gaps and using only straight-ahead rushes? Or are teams now doubling or chipping the Smith Brothers while others are not winning one-on-one's?
"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
Or are teams now doubling or chipping the Smith Brothers while others are not winning one-on-one's?
I don't know if this has increased, but teams are running it and getting the ball out fast. Not controlling for TOP, Chargers ran it 38 times vs. Pack compared to 23 times average this season. Oakland 31 vs 25.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
But is the pass rush not getting home because the line is playing more conservatively, thinking about filling gaps and using only straight-ahead rushes? Or are teams now doubling or chipping the Smith Brothers while others are not winning one-on-one's?
To stop those crossing routes, you need inside pressure to clog up sight lines. They are not getting it.
wist may have burned out too many neurons relieving his anxiety by self-medicating, but he's not wrong about the still too short supply of talent on that side of the ball.
tex is right too. Northwestern is not getting it done inside.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
But is the pass rush not getting home because the line is playing more conservatively, thinking about filling gaps and using only straight-ahead rushes? Or are teams now doubling or chipping the Smith Brothers while others are not winning one-on-one's?
I think its a reaction to a good pass rush. It could be opponent dependent, but opposing offenses have not been taking 5 and 7 step drops to go deep for quite a while.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
To stop those crossing routes, you need inside pressure to clog up sight lines. They are not getting it.
wist may have burned out too many neurons relieving his anxiety by self-medicating, but he's not wrong about the still too short supply of talent on that side of the ball.
tex is right too. Northwestern is not getting it done inside.
My God, with the resources both Ted and Gutes have plowed into that side of the ball, you'd think they'd have an All-Star defense at this point.
We need bigger bodies on the line to clog things up. I will always argue that your success depends on how either line plays; better D line makes linebackers etc all better. Oline good same thing.
If he doesn't run Jones and Williams at least 25 times against that awful Panthers' run defense I'll be very disappointed.
If he does run Jones and Williams at least 25 times against that awful Panthers' run defense Tex will be very disappointed.
Someone's going to be very disappointed.
Ain't nobody's gonna be disappointed if the Packers come out passing for an insurmountable 50-0 lead at the half, and then watch nothing but Boyle handoffs in the 2nd half.
All running the rock does is distort the GAB's fragile rhythm.
Ain't nobody's gonna be disappointed if the Packers come out passing for an insurmountable 50-0 lead at the half, and then watch nothing but Boyle handoffs in the 2nd half.
All running the rock does is distort the GAB's fragile rhythm.
At home, much more doable. They couldn't do it versus the Super Chargers.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment