Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

at what point do we look for A-rods replacement?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Patler View Post
    The Packers should plan as if Rodgers will not be the starter in 2022. It is easy to deal with having an extra starter-quality QB. It is hard to play without one.
    Reading through this thread thinking of my response, guess I'm not surprised Patler expressed it.

    Under the new CBA, I think it's more than smart to draft a QB first or second if you think the guy is a future starter. If Rodgers continues to play well, they have a sense of security and a capable backup that can win a few games if needed, and not like it's hard to recoup the draft capital down the road - see: Garappolo, Jimmy. There are a couple examples couple closer to home - the first traded Favre, or the move up in the fist and a third the Pack got for Hasselbeck. If they guess right, it will pay off one way or the other.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

    Comment


    • #32
      no need just yet. just make him run the O as designed. short and intermediate routes only. make him a game manager...after all, all he wants to do is win games now. right?
      Last edited by gbgary; 11-10-2019, 06:52 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by gbgary View Post
        no need just yet. just make him run the O as designed. short and intermediate routes only. make him a game manager...after all, all he wants to do now is win games...now.
        God damned negativists! Packers would have won by 30 today if they’d let Rodgers fling it around the yard! The running game just controls the clock for the other team!!!
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
          God damned negativists! Packers would have won by 30 today if they’d let Rodgers fling it around the yard! The running game just controls the clock for the other team!!!
          I would wholly endorse this position if he hit more than 2 deep balls our of the 8 or so he threw.
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by gbgary View Post
            no need just yet. just make him run the O as designed. short and intermediate routes only. make him a game manager...after all, all he wants to do now is win games...now.
            he's proven time after time that he isn't going to do that, he'll do things his way

            i'm with patler and guiness and the others. do it now. you have 4 or 5 years before the guy would actually start costing any real money. and you can always trade him if you have too

            but i'm thinking the end of rodgers is approaching faster then we think

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
              God damned negativists! Packers would have won by 30 today if they’d let Rodgers fling it around the yard! The running game just controls the clock for the other team!!!
              ok tex. lol

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                God damned negativists! Packers would have won by 30 today if they’d let Rodgers fling it around the yard! The running game just controls the clock for the other team!!!
                How did PB miss the TPB impression?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
                  How did PB miss the TPB impression?
                  I was agreeing with doppelgänger tex.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Hughes brings some thump to the Vikings secondary.
                    Originally posted by 3irty1
                    This is museum quality stupidity.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Zool View Post
                      Hughes brings some thump to the Vikings secondary.
                      Take it to the Other Games thread.

                      No wonder you were replaced as moderator.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by esoxx View Post
                        Take it to the Other Games thread.

                        No wonder you were replaced as moderator.
                        Shhhhhhit
                        Originally posted by 3irty1
                        This is museum quality stupidity.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I've got nothing against the running game - in moderation. Aaron Jones is beginning to look like Jonathan Taylor, and at times, Carolina made the Packers O Line look like the Badgers.

                          Prediction: Speaking of replacements, 15 or 20 years from now, Rodgers will be Aikman's replacement, and he'll be as much better a commentator than Aikman as he is a better QB.
                          What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Zool View Post
                            Shhhhhhit
                            esoxx is like a closer. He's not here all the time, but he does damage when present.
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                              I've got nothing against the running game - in moderation. Aaron Jones is beginning to look like Jonathan Taylor, and at times, Carolina made the Packers O Line look like the Badgers.

                              Prediction: Speaking of replacements, 15 or 20 years from now, Rodgers will be Aikman's replacement, and he'll be as much better a commentator than Aikman as he is a better QB.
                              15-20 years? Seems like a long time. Is that going to be after Danica crashes into his bank account and it ends in a fiery, disastrous divorce?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I don't think it matters. It's not the players that are special its the station of Greenbay Packers starting quarterback that is the source of their hall of fame powers. When a successor is needed, the secret ceremony committee of the board of directors will perform the esoteric ritual needed to imbue their new champion with talent and the team will have another decade of top shelf QB play. Spend a 1st rounder if you want, at least their rookie contract will be longer but a UDFA will be just as effective.

                                I know it sounds silly and superstitious but I hope they spend the 2nd round pick on a WR this year.
                                70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X