Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers 49ers discussion thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
    Yeah, if you do like I said and get too pass rush dependent, they'll gash you with the run like Denver did. I'd rather be solid up front too, but Lowry and Lancaster together don't add up to a Grady Jackson or Howard Green type guy, so don't use them to solve the problem. If you blitz them hard and get them behind the sticks, yardage-wise, I think we will get more stops - even though we will give up some big plays. The guys you mentioned who have been decent at times in coverage will be tested either way, but the upside is better with blitzing than with Northwestern disease infecting our D Line. Maybe we could get lucky and find a run stopper among those tryout guys, but it seems unlikely.
    Problem is they have been too leaky to go heavy up front and trust the back end to hold up. Backend has to improve for those numbers to climb.

    Good news is that while they concentrated on CMC, they were pretty effective. Just not sure they can do both at once.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #17
      The Packers will crush the Niners, I am guessing we jump out to a 24 point lead and coast to a 10 point victory.
      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

      Comment


      • #18
        I'm not saying go heavy up front - just the opposite. I want wall to wall pass rushers up front, stop the run (hopefully) with quickness not bulk. Maximize the pass rush, and make the time shorter that our secondary needs to keep coverage.
        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
          The Packers will crush the Niners, I am guessing we jump out to a 24 point lead and coast to a 10 point victory.
          I appreciate your confidence, any rationale or just a feeling?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
            I appreciate your confidence, any rationale or just a feeling?
            Almost lost to the Cards two times and could only put up 9 on the Redskins. Sherman is a shell of his old self and prone to being VERY grabby. Goropolololol or whatever "not Tom Brady"'s name is will panic like a long tail can in rocking chair showroom when he seems SmithX2 attacking him.
            Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
              Almost lost to the Cards two times and could only put up 9 on the Redskins. Sherman is a shell of his old self and prone to being VERY grabby. Goropolololol or whatever "not Tom Brady"'s name is will panic like a long tail can in rocking chair showroom when he seems SmithX2 attacking him.
              Works for me!

              Comment


              • #22
                Very appropriate since AZ almost had them Sunday...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                  The Packers will crush the Niners, I am guessing we jump out to a 24 point lead and coast to a 10 point victory.
                  I predict a battle of the "Titans" from the start. Both teams will score a TD and 1 to 2 FGs in the first Half.

                  Green Bay --- 10

                  San Francisco --- 13

                  Halftime


                  The second half will be a shootout as both teams score TDs. The deciding factor will be turnovers. I see GB winning this battle and as a result the Packers win a very close football game.


                  Green Bay --- 31

                  San Francisco --- 30

                  Final
                  sigpic

                  If your not the lead dog , then the view never changes !

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I don’t like blowout games but in light of the shitty behavior from whiner fans the past few years hoping, 38-24 GB. 49ers get garbage TD that makes it seem closer on paper.

                    Weather should be good for the passing game. Unlike the REAL 49ers stadium the Great America Parking lot extension that is Levi doesn’t get very windy (no bay breeze) and is a dry climate area.

                    But reality is probably a nailbiter like Rad called.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Their offensive identity is to take what the defense gives. Runs, short passes, intermediate, long....

                      Lafleur is talking about finding and honing in on what they do best after the by. I expect them to find their best plays of the first 10 weeks to beat each type of defense and start to highlight them.

                      Cover 1 beaters
                      Cover 2 beaters
                      Quarters beaters
                      Inside zone runs
                      Outside zone runs
                      Play action

                      Etc......


                      The next six weeks I expect them to develop an identity with how they attack each type of defense with an overall identity of “take what the defense is given”

                      I also expect to see the offense cleaner with substitutions and pace.

                      Ideally we’ll get a bye week to start the post season as well. That will open up all sorts of new options, like counters off of what they do best and tendency breakers.
                      Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Because the Packers are so healthy and just came off a bye, and it’s the final six games so they can and should dial in on what they do best now.... I do expect to see the Packers peaking as they finish the season.
                        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Adams in the slot a little more
                          More MVS deep routes
                          More Lazard
                          Less Allison
                          More Graham running vertical
                          Jones/Williams 1/2 to keep Jones fresh

                          A bunch of the same mix snd match stuff with Kumerow, Lewis, Tonyan, Sternberger and Vitale




                          These are some of the things I expect to see down the stretch
                          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Kittle might be back this week. Packers haven't had many answers for opposing TE's (Or anybody else running crossing routes over the middle of the field). Hope they come up with something.
                            I can't run no more
                            With that lawless crowd
                            While the killers in high places
                            Say their prayers out loud
                            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                            A thundercloud
                            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                              Kittle might be back this week. Packers haven't had many answers for opposing TE's (Or anybody else running crossing routes over the middle of the field). Hope they come up with something.
                              Not a good time to run into kittle.... Inraheim Campbell might be the answer at that dime linebacker spot, but I wouldn’t expect him to really hit his stride for a a few weeks.

                              Defensively, they’re so young in that back end.... I think we really need to cross our fingers for health in the back end of the defense so they can develop cohesion and chemistry.
                              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                                Almost lost to the Cards two times and could only put up 9 on the Redskins. Sherman is a shell of his old self and prone to being VERY grabby. Goropolololol or whatever "not Tom Brady"'s name is will panic like a long tail can in rocking chair showroom when he seems SmithX2 attacking him.
                                Think its spelled Gabagool.
                                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X