Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Never too early 2020 NFL Draft Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
    With Rodgers and time running out there is urgency to get the real deal for receivers.

    SERIOUS QUESTION

    What type of value do you think we could get for Rashan Gary in a trade ? I know it would never happen because GM's dont want to eat crow this early, but could you package pick 30 and Gary to get up to 10 ?
    No. Teams don't normally trade guys they just drafted. The moment you announce Gary is available for trade, you are basically admitting he is a disapppintment. That automatically reduces his trade value. Better to hang onto him and hope he develops.
    I can't run no more
    With that lawless crowd
    While the killers in high places
    Say their prayers out loud
    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
    A thundercloud
    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
      No. Teams don't normally trade guys they just drafted. The moment you announce Gary is available for trade, you are basically admitting he is a disapppintment. That automatically reduces his trade value. Better to hang onto him and hope he develops.
      Unless your GM has fallen in love with a guy he did not get to select in a previous draft (see Wolf, Ron).

      If that were the case here, the smitten GM would be calling the Packers though.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by pbmax View Post
        Unless your GM has fallen in love with a guy he did not get to select in a previous draft (see Wolf, Ron).

        If that were the case here, the smitten GM would be calling the Packers though.
        Or you draft Rosen and then pick Murray. Agree they wouldn't get a lot for Gary. I don't think packaging him with #30 would get you to #10. Maybe #15, but I don't see the point. There's plenty of WR depth outside of Lamb & Jeudy.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
          No. Teams don't normally trade guys they just drafted. The moment you announce Gary is available for trade, you are basically admitting he is a disappointment. That automatically reduces his trade value. Better to hang onto him and hope he develops.

          I agree with you, and then I see poor Josh Rosen with his clipboard and baseball cap, who in two years is going to have a team give up on him and draft a QB within the top 5 picks of the draft.


          The Packers with Wolf did draft Fred Vinson, and trade him the next season for Ahman Green, but I don't think that had anything to do with them giving up on the defensive back, they just really needed a running back. The Packers traded a second pick for a 3rd round pick. The Packers were also in reasonable shape at corner because Vinson was the 2nd out of three cornerbacks drafted by Wolf in the 1999 draft. Mike McKenzie who was drafted in the third round was already a starter and the first pick Antwan Edwards was bit of a disappointment but worked himself on to the field as a nickel and then a safety. Vinson after the trade submarined his career as he ended up shredding his knee in a pick up basketball game.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
            With Rodgers and time running out there is urgency to get the real deal for receivers.

            SERIOUS QUESTION

            What type of value do you think we could get for Rashan Gary in a trade ? I know it would never happen because GM's dont want to eat crow this early, but could you package pick 30 and Gary to get up to 10 ?

            Lay off the pain killers

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
              3 round mock draft. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...ns-pass-on-tua

              Packers picks:

              #30 Kenneth Murray - LB - Oklahoma

              #62 Jalen Reagor - WR - TCU

              #94 - Ben Bartch - OT - Saint John's

              I would be ecstatic with the 1st 2 picks. Would even be willing to trade up a bit for Murray. Don't know anything about Bartch at this point.

              Bretsky - Lamb is the 4th pick.

              Interesting draft, Bartch is a division 3 kid from St. John's in Minnesota. He did a nice job at the senior bowl and has went from feel good story about a small school kid maybe getting a chance at the NFL to jumping up draft boards. He is probably a top 10 tackle prospect going into the combine.

              I have been hearing talks of Reagor being the 4th receiver taken in the 2020 draft. The top three are solidified but there is a bunch of discussion on who is the next best. Reagor, Shenault, Jefferson, Hamler, Higgins, and Aiyuk have all been mentioned as the next best.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                With Rodgers and time running out there is urgency to get the real deal for receivers.

                SERIOUS QUESTION

                What type of value do you think we could get for Rashan Gary in a trade ? I know it would never happen because GM's dont want to eat crow this early, but could you package pick 30 and Gary to get up to 10 ?
                30 + Gary for OBJ would be awesome.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                  30 + Gary for OBJ would be awesome.
                  I'd rather have Myles Garrett but if it had to be OBJ I'd ask CLE to throw in some extra kicking nets too.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                    30 + Gary for OBJ would be awesome.
                    No way in hell would I do that.

                    Cleveland would jump at that trade.
                    wist

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
                      I agree with you, and then I see poor Josh Rosen with his clipboard and baseball cap, who in two years is going to have a team give up on him and draft a QB within the top 5 picks of the draft.


                      The Packers with Wolf did draft Fred Vinson, and trade him the next season for Ahman Green, but I don't think that had anything to do with them giving up on the defensive back, they just really needed a running back. The Packers traded a second pick for a 3rd round pick. The Packers were also in reasonable shape at corner because Vinson was the 2nd out of three cornerbacks drafted by Wolf in the 1999 draft. Mike McKenzie who was drafted in the third round was already a starter and the first pick Antwan Edwards was bit of a disappointment but worked himself on to the field as a nickel and then a safety. Vinson after the trade submarined his career as he ended up shredding his knee in a pick up basketball game.
                      Holmgren was a noted fan of not fumbling and therefore, wasn't too fond of Ahman in his younger days.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                        No. Teams don't normally trade guys they just drafted. The moment you announce Gary is available for trade, you are basically admitting he is a disapppintment. That automatically reduces his trade value. Better to hang onto him and hope he develops.

                        I would play devil's advocate on your point (although you are probably right) and suggest throwing him in a deal does not automatically admit he's a disappointment. However, I think after a team thoroughly scouts how much he contributed, and was used, that is the conclusion they will come to. And you are right about reducing his trade value; nobody would retake him at pick 12 if we had a do over so I was just curious if he might have some value in moving up along with our 1st. Just my pondering thoughts
                        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
                          Lay off the pain killers

                          You don't get any trophies for not taking the Vike
                          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                          Comment


                          • Oates says its all about speed. Except for Adams and Jones.



                            Speed is good. Production is better.

                            And Tom doesn't wrestle with the big receiver plan that Gutekunst had last year. Someone should ask him about it.
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • MVS has speed, but as Harvey indicated again and again, his hands (catch point) are awful. We saw that perfectly clearly on the bomb in the Bears game. And the Chiefs two longest pass completions were blown coverages.

                              Whether it is Encyclopedia St. Brown, Stromberg, Lazard, or another veteran FA WR, what the Packers need is another reliable target or two or three for Rodgers to connect with, in the Flower offense. Sure a guy with 4.2 speed would certainly be nice. And I'd like a new ferrari delivered to my driveway tomorrow also, as long as we're dreaming.
                              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                                They would need to trade pretty much their whole draft to move up that high, unless the trade also involved a pretty good player. What's this fascination people have with trading up to get the top WR in the draft? How many Super Bowl rings does Randy Moss have? Or Larry Fitzgerald? Or A.J. Green? Or Julio Jones? This team already has Davante Adams. They don't need somebody better than Adams. They need someone to complement Adams. This draft is full of guys like that.
                                1, 0, 0 for the SBs.

                                Culpepper, Oakland, Brady for Moss
                                Fitzgerald had 2 years of a HOF QB and made a SB
                                Green had Dalton his whole career

                                If you can get a HOF WR, you go get him. Unless it's Ditka level dumb. If it's next year's 1st and this year's 1st, and you feel 100% confident he's a stud, you go get him IMO.
                                Originally posted by 3irty1
                                This is museum quality stupidity.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X