Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2020 Wide Receivers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    RIP Darrius Shepherd

    You are the weakest link.

    Comment


    • #17
      We went a lot of draft Captial on MVS and ESB, we have a diamond in the rough Lazard, elite #1 in Adams, now one of these young guys needs to step up in their third year.

      Also how would a rookie do with AR when they will not ha e OTAs or anything like that?
      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by smuggler View Post
        RIP Darrius Shepherd

        You are the weakest link.
        Shepherd's competition isn't those other WRs so much as it's Tyler Irvin. To me, Irvin is nothing special, and I'd like to see Shepherd show some improvement and beat him. But then again, Shepherd even if you take away his blunders wasn't all that special either. Maybe Dequoy beats both of them out.
        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

        Comment


        • #19
          I think Malik Taylor, Bagelman and Kumerow are Sheppard's competition. I don't see Darius making the cut.
          Tyler Ervin can at least return punts and ran a 4.41 40. Sheppard didn't exactly impress last year with routes or punts, runs a 4.6, and I think his upside is very limited. Ervin's better now and I expect still will be in Week 13.

          Comment


          • #20
            This receiver room overall is pathetic.

            Comment


            • #21
              It has Adams so pathetic is a bit of an over statement. Remove all teams #1 wr and we are definitely bottom 5 imo.
              All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

              George Orwell

              Comment


              • #22
                If they cut Swervin' Ervin for Shepard its going to get ugly again on ST.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by run pMc View Post
                  Random thought: What if the problem with the WRs was Alvis Whitted?

                  I'm wondering if Gute is going to pick thru the veteran cuts that are going to happen with all these WRs getting drafted, or if he's going to poach WRs off teams' practice squads.
                  Especially if any WR from an offense that matches LaFleur's or a similar system gets cut and can still play.

                  I was talking to my son about his desire for the Packers to draft a receiver high in the draft. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just throwing it out there that Aaron is not like Brett in that if you gave Brett a weapon, he seemed more open to trying to utilize it, and it didn't seem to need this breaking in period that we've seen with Rodgers seeming to need with other receivers. The point is, even if you draft a receiver early, there is no guarantee that Rodgers will develop chemistry with him right away, enough to make a difference, or possibly even at all. The advantage with Rodgers always seems to go to the established players. Yes, I wish they had actually drafted a receiver, but if it's between a guy who might not be able to make the roster, or a guy who can help the depth on the O or D line, I think the front office was clearly more in favor of the latter.
                  "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Carolina_Packer View Post
                    Especially if any WR from an offense that matches LaFleur's or a similar system gets cut and can still play.

                    I was talking to my son about his desire for the Packers to draft a receiver high in the draft. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just throwing it out there that Aaron is not like Brett in that if you gave Brett a weapon, he seemed more open to trying to utilize it, and it didn't seem to need this breaking in period that we've seen with Rodgers seeming to need with other receivers. The point is, even if you draft a receiver early, there is no guarantee that Rodgers will develop chemistry with him right away, enough to make a difference, or possibly even at all. The advantage with Rodgers always seems to go to the established players. Yes, I wish they had actually drafted a receiver, but if it's between a guy who might not be able to make the roster, or a guy who can help the depth on the O or D line, I think the front office was clearly more in favor of the latter.
                    I certainly don't think they purposely didn't draft a WR because Rodgers seems to prefer more seasoned WRs over unproven ones. What I do believe is that after the first couple of rounds, the WRs on the board would have needed more practice and polish to provide much help to this team in the near term. The WRs on the roster, although an admittedly pedestrian group, have worked with Rodgers for some time, and would be ahead of the curve. This is especially true if we have limited training camp.

                    I believe our best bet for improving this position is to pick up a veteran cut and hope for some improvement from the 3rd year veterans.

                    Remember how much they used Ryan Grant after acquiring him. That should tell you the relative strength of the WRs on the roster and tell you how good that veteran has to be to see playing time.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      54% of our snaps last year went to undrafted receivers

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Upnorth View Post
                        It has Adams so pathetic is a bit of an over statement. Remove all teams #1 wr and we are definitely bottom 5 imo.


                        You Kidding ? Stop being nice .


                        Remove the #1's we are last
                        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I could see Begelton win the slot job... he's a pretty good player. A little hard to evaluate though, because of the level of competition.
                          wist

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                            I could see Begelton win the slot job... he's a pretty good player. A little hard to evaluate though, because of the level of competition.
                            Yep, level of competition and playing on some huge ass field which allows him to overcome being SLOW.

                            I will be targeting him at camp(if there is a camp) to see if he can get separation. It’s a huge question mark. I wouldn’t be cashing any checks on it.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Did he return kicks in Canada?
                              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                                Did he return kicks in Canada?
                                Not that I am aware of.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X