I think I agree with Tex here.
It's all about optionality. The Packers now have a hedge against Rodgers decline as well as against some of his shenanigans.
What they don't have is his sure fire successor.
Enterprises work to hedge against catastrophic risk and to plan for the future. It's hard for me not to see that this way. I may be proven wrong if the whole thing blows up in their face.
It's all about optionality. The Packers now have a hedge against Rodgers decline as well as against some of his shenanigans.
What they don't have is his sure fire successor.
Enterprises work to hedge against catastrophic risk and to plan for the future. It's hard for me not to see that this way. I may be proven wrong if the whole thing blows up in their face.

Comment