Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GETTIN NO LOVE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Patler View Post
    That brings up a good point. Every QB has to find their "style", and the team needs to learn how to incorporate that style into their offense. Favre and Rodgers are almost polar opposites.

    Favre never worried about interceptions, and especially later in his career seemed to dread being sacked. He would do almost anything to avoid a sack. Rodgers, on the other hand, abhors interceptions, and will hold the ball, take a sack or run to avoid it. Either way can work, as we have seen, but some things have to be done differently for one or the other.

    First, Love has to find his comfort zone, then coaches have to devise how to best use it.
    All this and a whole bunch of things we probably haven’t thought of or realized. Way early to make calls on Love though. I think most of us are in that boat.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
      Incorrect

      We don't have to believe the click bait. Whether I buy it or not I underscore it and consider this a redshirt year for our project with upside.

      But coaches are famous for puffery. I'm always skeptical about that. Puffery is the one thing to be sure we're getting on an annual basis, and it's rarely pufferying the producers who we are confident in
      If it helps, Silverstein at JSO has said Gary has looked good in camp. With Z being out for several practices he got more reps and he looks fast, powerful and sets the best edge vs. the run of the OLBs. I'm skeptical of coach-puffery as well, but in this case there might be a partial truth. I'll believe it when I see, and hope I do.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
        AR got his shit really together in 2010.

        2008 below average
        2009 average with glimpses
        2010 HOF level play

        And that was after three years of sitting
        More like:

        2008 Solid (28 TDs, 13 ints, he only took 34 sacks)
        2009 Good (65%, 8.2 ypa, 30 TDs, 7 ints) moving to very good by the end of the year (Arizona playoff game)
        2010 Good moving to great by the end of the year (Super Bowl run)
        2011 On a level I had never seen by a QB
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #19
          In 2008 his stats were prettier than his losing efforts would indicate. Going from Favre, the tempo felt pathetically slow, seeming to never have the defenses on their heels. He's always been turnover adverse and made a few throws so his stats wherent awful but 37 year old favre was a lot better than 24 year old Rodgers.

          Love has a long way to go before we start making threads about no love
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #20
            Rodgers showed the arm and leg talent early. He made pretty throws in his 4th NFL season for sure. Let's see love in his 4th season before we start the sky is falling talk
            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
              Incorrect

              We don't have to believe the click bait. Whether I buy it or not I underscore it and consider this a redshirt year for our project with upside.

              But coaches are famous for puffery. I'm always skeptical about that. Puffery is the one thing to be sure we're getting on an annual basis, and it's rarely pufferying the producers who we are confident in
              Listen to other players. Listen to the talk out of Pittsburg on Chase Claypool. Coaches aren't saying much. Media is positive. Players are absolutely gushing. Chase might be top rookie this year.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #22
                He sounds like a slightly slower slightly heavier MVS hahahahahaha.
                What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Yea, 6' 4 1/2" 238 pounds and a mere 4.42. He is a beast chosen in the 2nd round of a WR rich draft. But yea, basically the same as MVS who is 1/2 inch shorter, 32 pounds lighter, but runs a whopping .05 faster. He also outjumped MVS by 10" in the vertical with an ordinary 40.5".


                  But hey, the other guy over 235 to run a sub 4.45 at WR was some piker named Calvin Johnson.
                  The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    If we are having this conversation 8/31/21, then I'll be concerned.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                      Listen to other players.
                      Also, not what they say, but how they say it. I remember knowing Greg Jennings was going to be an absolute stud because of how Chuck talked about him during camp. Just saying he was very advanced in his route running and supremely polished, etc.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                        Yea, 6' 4 1/2" 238 pounds and a mere 4.42. He is a beast chosen in the 2nd round of a WR rich draft. But yea, basically the same as MVS who is 1/2 inch shorter, 32 pounds lighter, but runs a whopping .05 faster. He also outjumped MVS by 10" in the vertical with an ordinary 40.5".


                        But hey, the other guy over 235 to run a sub 4.45 at WR was some piker named Calvin Johnson.
                        Yep. Shoulda drafted DK Metcalf.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Is anyone else reminded of Colin Kaepernick when they look at Jordan Love?

                          (Ducks)
                          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
                            Is anyone else reminded of Colin Kaepernick when they look at Jordan Love?

                            (Ducks)
                            No, not really. Kaepernick had great athleticism (4.53 40), very strong arm, poor accuracy, slow delivery (long windup). Love has solid athleticism (4.74 40), a good arm, decent accuracy, solid delivery.
                            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X