Week 1 Vikings discussion thread

[GB-Brandon]

The other thing to watch for is when you have “Stellar Tackle Play” like we had with Bulaga it’s easier to hide poor to average guard play. It will be interesting to see how the whole right side of the OL holds up.

Like I posted much earlier I expect a lot of J. Williams tomorrow. Not a horrible thing but makes the offense even less dynamic in certain situations.

[RashanGary]

The other thing to watch for is when you have “Stellar Tackle Play” like we had with Bulaga it’s easier to hide poor to average guard play. It will be interesting to see how the whole right side of the OL holds up.

Like I posted much earlier I expect a lot of J. Williams tomorrow. Not a horrible thing but makes the offense even less dynamic in certain situations.

R-E-L-A-X chicken little

[RashanGary]

In Gute we trust

[RashanGary]

No, he's on the PS. I looked up the transaction.

If he were on the opening day roster his salary would be guaranteed for the year. The rules for activating from the PS used to say that player had to be carried the rest of the year - not sure if that is still the case.

Pretty sure only the players on the initial roster are guaranteed. He was signed after so not guaranteed

[Bretsky]

In Gute we trust

Don't be a Gutebag

[RashanGary]

Don't be a Gutebag

I'm trolling

[wist43]

Pretty sure only the players on the initial roster are guaranteed. He was signed after so not guaranteed

Was listening to a podcast, and they said it was 'on the roster week 1'. As such and b/c of that, they said they expect Mack might be activated on Tuesday if they still need him; then, can cut him later without consequence.

I don't know myself, I haven't kept up with the rules. Just going off what they said.

[RashanGary]

Oh yeah, looks like ps

[The Shadow]

Forget the BS.
It comes down to QBs.
Packers 27
Vikes 17

[Patler]

No, he's on the PS. I looked up the transaction.

If he were on the opening day roster his salary would be guaranteed for the year.

Not sure about the guarantee, isn't he only a 2nd year player? Doesn't the guarantee apply only to vested veterans (essentially 4 years)?

[wist43]

Not sure about the guarantee, isn't he only a 2nd year player? Doesn't the guarantee apply only to vested veterans (essentially 4 years)?

Not sure, like I say - I haven't kept up with the rule changes. The podcast I was listening to said they looked up the rules and that's what they reported back.

I think Mack could be a good thing rotational guy, but he needs to be kept fresh.

[GB-Brandon]

Forget the BS.
It comes down to QBs.
Packers 27
Vikes 17

Does this mean we’ll get to see Jordan Love today?

[GB-Brandon]

I'm trolling

And Wagner can’t even get on the field today!!!!

http://twitter.com/RobDemovsky/status/1305181481237721090

I try telling you these things but you just don’t want to listen!!!!!!!!

[GB-Brandon]

Its pretty simple to do math. Average out the 7 years both players played and see who is the better player by an objective source, PFF. Its not the guy you seem to think it is.

Actually, before last year, it wasn't even that close. So Bulaga has a near career year at the age of 31 to get it close. He still isn't the tackle Rick Wagner has been in his career. Data doesn't lie.

End of Story. Please Quit disrespecting Rick Wagner.

But But But But But?

http://twitter.com/RobDemovsky/status/1305181481237721090

Lmao. You guys are something else!!!!

[RashanGary]

Lizard!