This is why I love the Krob signing. He will help us win now, so we can hopefully have a decent season, and if he gets out of line just cut him. How can you not like this signing? What; is he going to mess up team chemistry? Umm, we don't have much team chemistry.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bulldog sticking up for Brett?
Collapse
X
-
He was a lousy head coach; but if you look at his offenses you would find a guy that on paper is probably more qualified than MM. Don't get me wrong; it'd be insane to have Norv as our HC; but he has a decent track record as an OC.Originally posted by mraynrandNah, I don't want to JUST be difficult! Actually, I think he's lost it, frankly. That and he's been the HC for some teams that, for whatever reason, were pretty much devoid of talent.Originally posted by BretskyAre you saying he's a crappy coordinator or just trying to be difficult now
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Anytime you can add a Pro Bowler with versatility across three positions...WR/KR/PR (and add) with Vet. experience from a Division rival.. that's a good signing.Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MDThis is why I love the Krob signing. He will help us win now, so we can hopefully have a decent season, and if he gets out of line just cut him. How can you not like this signing? What; is he going to mess up team chemistry? Umm, we don't have much team chemistry.
As long as...
TT has the bases covered regarding any possible relapse on behalf of Koren Robinson.
Koren Robinson needs support fro TREATMENT as a FIRST PRIORITY...FIRST on the AGENDA.
Once that is deemed successful then he can contribute possibly in OUR Line -up.Not at this time should that be considered .
TT can't place the HORSE before "the WAGON" !!!
If he screws up he's gone... otherwise he's a valuable addition where he suits a problem of need at WR and KR and PR.
Koren Robinson may be a perfect fit. He will certainly offer more to Brett Favre.
Oh GregJennings. . as I shake my head??? A novel Packer fan that after only one game in OUR Season, pulls for "the Packers " to lose??
It takes all kinds.
GO PACK GO ! FAITH in 2006 !** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment
-
I cannot see Favre functioning in a Norv Turner timing offense. Where the pass has to be spot on, on time and in rhythm.Originally posted by BretskyThen you are not asking the right person; I read where Bates and Norv Turner are very close friends. If Bates got the job Norv Turner would have been our OC.
Brett is great at many things, none of which were in the above paragraph.
People got their shorts in a bundle thinking about changing ARod's delivery. Think about Norv trying to fix Favre's footwork. Oy.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mraynrandWhat the hell does Bates have to do with it? The defense gave up ONE TD, and four FGs - two FGs set up by the Herron fumble and the absurd 4th and one call (Hey, another Packer coach gets it wrong on fourth and one).Originally posted by BretskyOriginally posted by GrnBay007Yeah that hurts! But you also have to remember this Bears team had all their starters back....opening game and they already jelled...no surprise there.Originally posted by mraynrand
What I'm in shock from is the fact that the 2005 Packers, with a far crappier team on paper, played much better ball against the Bears than this sorry bunch.
We knew the offense would be challenged with a subpar OL and limited depth at WR...
But our defense has a definite talent upgrade form last year
And we played a bland offense that was average at the very best
And we were dominated
Jim Bates, anyone ??
That was bad officiating made it on 3rd down made it oin 4th down WTF.
If you think Bates would have been a better HEAD coach, OK fine - who would he have hired as O-coordinator?
Mike Martz before Detroit got him.
I have yet to see someone who wanted Bates as HC answer this question reasonably - what guy out there was going to come in and install a decent offense as OC in GB, when all the better offensive minds were getting Head coaching jobs. You really needed to hire a talented guy as OC, and who was that going to be? If you say Mariucci, I'm laughing already. If you think the problem yesterday was the defense, you just didn't watch the game closely.
They got torched immediately for 10 points then buckled down, I am pretty certain bates would not have left POOP out there that is for sure.
See that goose egg on the scoreboard? Did you notice that the Packers were 1-11 on third downs and didn't cross midfield until late in the first half, and only on a FAKE PUNT? Wake up.
I agree with that but the play calling stunk, Tauscher and Clifton sucked the TE's sucked and the WR's except Driver sucked, Green looked good but he can't run every play and he would have to because Gado and Herron suck and wouldn't be on any other NFL roster.
Comment
-
A lot of the reason that Brett had a nice game early on was due to the play calling. They were dialing up good plays for him. I like the fact that we continued to run it. You have to against the Bears. I think we'll beat them in Dec."For a fan base that so gratefully took to success, it bothers me how easily some fans are resigned to failure."
No Mo Moss 9.14.06

Comment
-
The problem with playing Favre is that somehow we have to find out if Rodgers is the real McCy. Say we have the 2nd or 3rd pick and Quinn is available and is as good as advertised. What will TT do? Trade or draft Quinn. Can't tell unless Rodgers shows him something during the season.Been there done that!
Comment
-
The Bears are not a great team. They will be exposed, mark my words. We beat ourselves Sunday, the Bears had 1 play. Their defense looked mediocre. They didn't get sacks, we made them, watch the film. When was the last time the Bears allowed a 100 yard rusher? Oh yeah, I forgot, Green had what? 79 yards going into the late 4th quarter and then got 21 more during "slop" time but still managed over 5.0 YPC. Say what you will, the Bears defense did not play well.Originally posted by GregJenningsThe Bears are a GREAT!! team....
This was expected. We will look better, we will win a few games but the divsion looks stronger and next years draft is already looking us in the face. I want another stud. Adrian Peterson, Brady Quinn, Calvin Johnson...I don't think we're bad enough to get one of those 3 but there are a couple DE's, a RB and WR's that should be there for us. Whoever we get in teh top 10 stands a good chance to be better than whatever we've got.
If we're lucky we'll end up in teh top 5 but I don't knwo how realistic that is. We do have an easy schedule and Brett is always good for a couple big plays."Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Comment

Comment