More Banjo - Packers vs. Colts

[run pMc]

I'm miss pb. Solid posts. Who is Brandon?

GB-Brandon. Or were you answering a Jeopardy question? RIP Alex Trebek.

[Harlan Huckleby]

RIP pb

[Upnorth]

GB-Brandon. Or were you answering a Jeopardy question? RIP Alex Trebek.

Run pmc, No. Just forgot.

Harlan do you know something about pb????

[bobblehead]

Thats the thing. I’m one of the more relaxed fans regarding this disaster Gute and company have built. I was hoping for the best like anyone else but I knew these guys weren’t good enough and had my expectations adjusted appropriately. I was not shocked one bit by this loss. I even told RG before game I was betting against the trends but oh well. Not doing it again with these jokers the rest of the way.

They can’t be trusted in any big game period!! PRETENDERS!!

Yet you claimed you bet the packers on the ML. Rewrite history if you want, but the internet is a recording bitch. I said I expected to lose and I bet Indy laying the points. You are wrong as usual.

[bobblehead]

Agree.
FWIW, I still have the suspicion Brandon is actually pb pretending to be a troll.

Wait, Pb is clown shoes? It would be funny, but I doubt it. He hasn't told me the running game is irrelevant yet.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Run pmc, No. Just forgot.

Harlan do you know something about pb????

nah, I was just joking.

The all-time funniest joke ever at Packerrats was when somebody
left or threatened to leave the forum and somebody else posted
a picture of Lenin lying in state. I just remembered whose
joke it was - Swede! Swede was hilarious. He and pbmax
must be together in packerrats heaven.

[GB-Brandon]

Yet you claimed you bet the packers on the ML. Rewrite history if you want, but the internet is a recording bitch. I said I expected to lose and I bet Indy laying the points. You are wrong as usual.

Wrong as usual? I posted that I was “Betting Against my trends” and taking the Packers ML. It was a mistake I don’t make all to often anymore but went with my heart and lost. Not the end of the world. More of final validation that this team is just some front runner pretender which I said from the beginning which would make me “1000 Percent Correct” for those keeping score actually!!!

[GB-Brandon]

If people are gonna continue to mis-quote me on “My History Of Posting” and twist things around then I won’t post here anymore and I won’t reveal whats coming. I don’t have to give all this knowledge for free!!!!

I’m trying to help out.

[RashanGary]

The refs were for the Packers. No doubt. I made the right bet and so did Brandon.

[bobblehead]

Wrong as usual? I posted that I was “Betting Against my trends” and taking the Packers ML. It was a mistake I don’t make all to often anymore but went with my heart and lost. Not the end of the world. More of final validation that this team is just some front runner pretender which I said from the beginning which would make me “1000 Percent Correct” for those keeping score actually!!!

You just claimed my post was 100% true. You bet packers on the ML. That was the entire point of my post. How am I wrong? I was right. I bet Indy. You were wrong. You bet the Packers. You are consistently wrong about most things.

[bobblehead]

The refs were for the Packers. No doubt. I made the right bet and so did Brandon.

But you lost if you bet the Packers. How is that the right bet?

[bobblehead]

I have actually decided to go against “All Trends” on this one too and place with the Packers. Sometimes you just gotta do it.

Browns and Packers ML today.

Lol...tell me how I am wrong. Please enlighten me. You laid what? -220 on the browns. Big play on a home favorite playing a bad team from another conference...but then you botched it with the Packers...a team playing a very good team in their house from another conference.

Enlighten me with your big ML plays this week. I like the home dog Lions today on the ML. Also think Denver has a very good chance to knock off "serious contender" Saints on sunday. Thats a nice little dog parlay that pays over 5.5 to 1.

[GB-Brandon]

Lol...tell me how I am wrong. Please enlighten me. You laid what? -220 on the browns. Big play on a home favorite playing a bad team from another conference...but then you botched it with the Packers...a team playing a very good team in their house from another conference.

Enlighten me with your big ML plays this week. I like the home dog Lions today on the ML. Also think Denver has a very good chance to knock off "serious contender" Saints on sunday. Thats a nice little dog parlay that pays over 5.5 to 1.

Your such a JACK ASS!!!!!!

Bet Details:
WON: 367 USC -2½ (-110) (NCAA FB) Score: 33-17
WON: 416 Auburn (-370) (NCAA FB) Score: 30-17
WON: 452 Browns (-140) (NFL) Score: 22-17
LOST: 461 Packers (+105) (NFL) Score: 31-34

[RashanGary]

But you lost if you bet the Packers. How is that the right bet?

Because it was for the right reason and will win money over time. Trust the process.

[RashanGary]

I've lucked out on bad bets and got bad beat by good bets.

Once you start understanding the refs rig games (albeit not perfect in execution all of the time) you realize that the NFL is nothing like pure sports where the better team usually wins and the single greatest factor in NFL football games is referees.

Once you know that, winning becomes much more probable.