Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Packers vs Bears Week 17 Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
    Not everybody likes the culture in Seattle believe it or not. I’m sure being inactive had something to do with it. His PFF grade is 68.5 in games played. That’s an upgrade from Dean Lowry’s 59.5!! I say let him play!!!!
    I see no reason why he wouldn’t. Keke is out with a concussion too. Don’t know how the covid thing works right now. Still, you can never have too many fatties up front.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
      If 49ers upset Seattle (thinking the odds are good) then it doesn’t matter. But the games are on at the same time so we are gonna see a good one.

      Man the fucking NFL has gotta be loving how the season is finishing. As someone who was tired of all the BS a few seasons ago I have to admit I am hooked again.
      Did I miss something? Why would the '49ers closing out a lost season be able to hang with a Seahawks team that has something to play for?
      --
      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Guiness View Post
        Did I miss something? Why would the '49ers closing out a lost season be able to hang with a Seahawks team that has something to play for?
        Last week that beat an Arizona team that had every thing to play for. They've beaten the Rams twice this year. They have Kittle back now. They are not to be taken lightly.
        I can't run no more
        With that lawless crowd
        While the killers in high places
        Say their prayers out loud
        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
        A thundercloud
        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

        Comment


        • #34
          Division rival. All about pride
          All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

          George Orwell

          Comment


          • #35
            Trubisky's QBR the last four weeks:

            DET. 108
            HOU. 127
            MINN. 98
            JAX. 98

            Not bad.

            Rodgers the last four weeks:

            PHI. 129
            DET. 137
            CAR. 92
            TEN. 128

            Comment


            • #36
              Bears secondary is about equal to ours

              The Bears have the better defense.

              Packers offense is a lot better than Bears, although Bears are coming on now. Gonna be a really tough game.
              Will be a tough game, but I think our secondary is playing better than theirs. Bears have the edge on defense, we have the edge on offense.

              As for Snacks, word is SEA wanted to play its younger players more and let them develop. Snacks wanted to play so he asked to be waived. Seems like there's no hard feelings. Reading between the lines, SEA likely felt the younger players had more upside, were part of their long-term plans, and might even be playing better than Snacks now. I doubt Snacks has a lot left in the tank, but even then he's probably a modest upgrade from Lowry and Lancaster. Keke has a concussion and Adams is on IR. Brian Price did not look good against TEN (I saw him getting blown back off the LOS frequently) and they aren't playing Rush. It's a good move.

              CHI has had an uptick in their offense, but they've also been playing some bad defenses. (DET, HOU, JAX) I think if GB comes out and plays their 'A' game CHI won't be able to stay with them.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by run pMc View Post
                Will be a tough game, but I think our secondary is playing better than theirs. Bears have the edge on defense, we have the edge on offense.

                As for Snacks, word is SEA wanted to play its younger players more and let them develop. Snacks wanted to play so he asked to be waived. Seems like there's no hard feelings. Reading between the lines, SEA likely felt the younger players had more upside, were part of their long-term plans, and might even be playing better than Snacks now. I doubt Snacks has a lot left in the tank, but even then he's probably a modest upgrade from Lowry and Lancaster. Keke has a concussion and Adams is on IR. Brian Price did not look good against TEN (I saw him getting blown back off the LOS frequently) and they aren't playing Rush. It's a good move.

                CHI has had an uptick in their offense, but they've also been playing some bad defenses. (DET, HOU, JAX) I think if GB comes out and plays their 'A' game CHI won't be able to stay with them.
                You'd think Rush gets released to give Snacks a roster spot.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                  You'd think Rush gets released to give Snacks a roster spot.
                  Keep them both and play them both at the same time. The “A” gaps would be as impregnable as the time Sherman ingeniously played Russell Maryland next to Gilbert Brown!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I thought you didn't like fatties, APB. I think they use Snacks to play nose tackle - right on the Center, covering both A gaps. Whether that's against the Bears or not remains to be seen. I always thought Kenny Clark was kinda wasted in that spot. With Snacks in there, they can give Kenny a little more flexibility.

                    As the Bears offense has improved, their D has regressed a little bit. Getting Hicks back, though, might help them if he is 100%.

                    I expect a comfortable Packer win in a more high scoring game than some would expect - something like 34-20 Packers.
                    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Bacteria tore ACL. Shitty
                      The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                      Vince Lombardi

                      "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                        I thought you didn't like fatties, APB. I think they use Snacks to play nose tackle - right on the Center, covering both A gaps. Whether that's against the Bears or not remains to be seen. I always thought Kenny Clark was kinda wasted in that spot. With Snacks in there, they can give Kenny a little more flexibility.

                        As the Bears offense has improved, their D has regressed a little bit. Getting Hicks back, though, might help them if he is 100%.

                        I expect a comfortable Packer win in a more high scoring game than some would expect - something like 34-20 Packers.
                        I don’t like drafting Yokozunas with premium picks, but I digged the Sherman U-160 Defense (67+93).

                        In all seriousness, as long as the Packers prevent opponents from ponding the rock up and down their rear ends, all’s good. Rush and the Snack together on the field could accomplish that feat.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Jenkins-Patrick-Linsley-Turner-Wagner
                          OR
                          Turner-Jenkins-Linsley-Patrick-Wagner

                          Considering Hicks is back and Mack plays mostly at LE, do we keep Jenkins inside this week?

                          The versatility of Turner and Jenkins has really helped us this year.
                          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                            Jenkins-Patrick-Linsley-Turner-Wagner
                            OR
                            Turner-Jenkins-Linsley-Patrick-Wagner

                            Considering Hicks is back and Mack plays mostly at LE, do we keep Jenkins inside this week?

                            The versatility of Turner and Jenkins has really helped us this year.
                            Who does Hicks usually line up over? You don't want Patrick lined up against Hicks all day.
                            I can't run no more
                            With that lawless crowd
                            While the killers in high places
                            Say their prayers out loud
                            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                            A thundercloud
                            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hmmmmm.... Hicks/Mack is probably the toughest two person matchup in football. Probably, they most like to attack the right side of the offense with that twosome. I was thinking turner at LT was all but determined, but after seeing it put out there, maybe keep the right side stable this week.
                              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Hicks and Mack are usually on the right side. I'm all for keeping the right side strong this week and making them have to shift if they want the mis match. Then at least all parties are a little off their spot. I dont know if there is a perfect way to do this.
                                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X