Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official 2021 NFL Draft Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    If your the Jacksonville Jaguars your gonna look at “BPA” differently. When your sitting there rebuilding the entire roster you truly are gonna want to take the best guy you can get regardless of position. A guy that can help by being a building block on your roster.

    When your a contender like the Packers and the coaching staff and franchise QB is asking and begging for a piece for the offense that will make the offense unstoppable and greatly improve the odds of delivering a championship then Fuck BPA. The GM should not be hasty or reckless but should be aggressive and do what is necessary to the make that happen!!!

    “BPA” should be then used in the sense in getting the best available player to fill that “missing piece.”

    Comment


    • #47
      Which missing piece?

      The RT? The DT? Ilb? Lots of missing pieces.

      Offense isn't doing to shabby at #1 in points. That defense has a few pieces it could use. And what seems strong one moment can be a weak point the next. Can never have enough pass rushers or dbs.

      And Arizona all these years with Fitz and that high flying offense never got her done. Nor Atlanta. Nor did Brady in 2007 when he finally got his "PIECE." Afterwards the "piece" became an afterthought and he won 3 without any "piece."

      Comment


      • #48
        Chew on this my friend:

        Would you rather have Davante Adams or the top DT in the league. Calais Campbell, JJ Watt, AD, Cox (your choice) in their prime OR Davante? They cost the same. (Ain't that crazy?)

        Which piece gets us a ring more certainly?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
          Let’s please not ruin this thread with this.

          Thank You!!
          Said the guy who ruined Literally EVERY thread in the offseason by bring it back to "whaaaaa....Gutes sucks, we need a WR....whaaaaa"
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
            If your the Jacksonville Jaguars your gonna look at “BPA” differently. When your sitting there rebuilding the entire roster you truly are gonna want to take the best guy you can get regardless of position. A guy that can help by being a building block on your roster.

            When your a contender like the Packers and the coaching staff and franchise QB is asking and begging for a piece for the offense that will make the offense unstoppable and greatly improve the odds of delivering a championship then Fuck BPA. The GM should not be hasty or reckless but should be aggressive and do what is necessary to the make that happen!!!

            “BPA” should be then used in the sense in getting the best available player to fill that “missing piece.”
            If one guy stands out as "having slipped" you always take him. If you have a guy ranked as a top 15 prospect and he slips to 32 you take him. Regardless of position (except QB if you have a Rodgers and now Love). If you pass on that guy because you have a good player at that position you handicap yourself.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Jaire View Post
              Chew on this my friend:

              Would you rather have Davante Adams or the top DT in the league. Calais Campbell, JJ Watt, AD, Cox (your choice) in their prime OR Davante? They cost the same. (Ain't that crazy?)

              Which piece gets us a ring more certainly?
              Obviously Adams but we never really had a realistic chance at Donald though so it’s a mute point. I like the dialogue but I’m really focused on this game and this run. I have a bunch of emotion and $ tied up in it with both the Packers and Bills. I do have a draft board I’m working on and we will have plenty of draft talk coming up soon. I just can’t go that deep into this right now.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                If one guy stands out as "having slipped" you always take him. If you have a guy ranked as a top 15 prospect and he slips to 32 you take him. Regardless of position (except QB if you have a Rodgers and now Love). If you pass on that guy because you have a good player at that position you handicap yourself.
                This can be true but there are also several variables such as “Why is that player dropping?” Such as the LB from Alabama a few years back, “Reuben Foster” or Oklahoma Sooner “Joe Mixon”. There is also players that drop due to injury such as “Jeffery Simmons” or “Sidney Jones” or “Bryce Love”

                So generally there are reasons or red flags why a player has dropped. The Packers don’t usually take chances on these types of players.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
                  Obviously Adams but we never really had a realistic chance at Donald though so it’s a mute point. I like the dialogue but I’m really focused on this game and this run. I have a bunch of emotion and $ tied up in it with both the Packers and Bills. I do have a draft board I’m working on and we will have plenty of draft talk coming up soon. I just can’t go that deep into this right now.
                  I guess I'm saying IF there was a choice between the #1 DT (flavor of choice) and the #1 WR, the DT is a no brainer.

                  Are you saying you would take Davante?

                  (You can answer after the game or next week. No rush. 😉 )

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                    If one guy stands out as "having slipped" you always take him. If you have a guy ranked as a top 15 prospect and he slips to 32 you take him. Regardless of position (except QB if you have a Rodgers and now Love). If you pass on that guy because you have a good player at that position you handicap yourself.
                    Yes!!!!

                    And what's better is Gute will move up to grab a guy and not just "hope" someone falls. They usually don't. We won't be settling for Datone again (hopefully). Gotta get the blue and gold chips early.
                    Last edited by Jaire; 01-24-2021, 01:44 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Let king and Jones go (unless Jones can be had for 10 or less)
                      Cut Preston
                      Make a decision on Kirksey (who really came on in his will role) after draft
                      Let Williams go (unless Jones goes and he's 5 or less)
                      Keep Wagner

                      Corner is a need
                      ILB probably a need
                      OT is a moderate need
                      DT is always a need for every team
                      WR is a need
                      RB is probably a need
                      If a safety is there early Amos can play alongside Barnes

                      You can kinds take BPA and not fail. Really good corners go at the end of round 1. If we went Corner 1 then maybe DT 2, our defense has a chance.
                      Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        I think Jones will be gone. He's a great player, but paying top dollar at RB has proven to be a bad bet in recent years. His choice of agent basically tells you where this is going. I would keep Williams, as he is one of the best 3rd down backs in football and won't break the bank. Would pair well with Dillon.

                        Draft should be heavy on defense this year. I don't think this team is going to be seeking a WR high. A slot guy would be nice, and you don't have to grab that guy in the first 50 picks. OL depth will be found in the draft.
                        It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Do we pick at 29 or 30?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                            Do we pick at 29 or 30?
                            Depends on what the Chiefs do. 30 if Chiefs win. 29 if they lose.
                            I can't run no more
                            With that lawless crowd
                            While the killers in high places
                            Say their prayers out loud
                            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                            A thundercloud
                            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              OL, DL, LB, CB all have a guy or two who could go around pick 30. Lots of 2nd round receiver possibilities. I'm guessing WR in round 2 because of depth. First round pick will be BPA (non qb) I'm sure.
                              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
                                OL, DL, LB, CB all have a guy or two who could go around pick 30. Lots of 2nd round receiver possibilities. I'm guessing WR in round 2 because of depth. First round pick will be BPA (non qb) I'm sure.
                                We don’t need a receiver for “Depth” dude. Whether we draft one or get one in FA we need another guy that can beat tight press. Your little homer boys can’t!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X