2021 Packers offense

[RashanGary]

I don't know how you can lose Lindsley and part of the year Bakh and not regress. Bakh should be about 90% by years end so maybe we have a better post season OL in 2021 than 2020.

Runyan looks like a shoe in replacement inside.

The other young guys are competing for center.

OL just loses a step until Bakh is 100%.


I think the skill players get better through chemistry. Lizard, MVS and Tonyan are all growing in lafleurs offense and with 12. They should be sharper and on the same page.



All in all I see a slight regression on offense because of OL. With some OL health luck, the post season offense can make it back to 2020 standard if Bakh gets close to 100% and everyone is healthy.


There is potential for the OL to be a dumpster fire as well. If Turner goes down and we’re starting two below average tackles, it could get ugly quick before Bakh comes back.

[Upnorth]

If we keep Tonyan (plea$e plea$e plea$e) I think the temporary loss of bakh is some what offset by the power running of thunder thighs. It will take some heat off the pass rush even if he isn't as good at blocking at as williams

Plus there is an outside chance we have one of our last 2 3rd rounders not injured at te...

[RashanGary]

If we keep Tonyan (plea$e plea$e plea$e) I think the temporary loss of bakh is some what offset by the power running of thunder thighs. It will take some heat off the pass rush even if he isn't as good at blocking at as williams

Plus there is an outside chance we have one of our last 2 3rd rounders not injured at te...

It's gonna take chemistry and improvement across the board if we want to hold down the fort till Bakh is ready.

[texaspackerbacker]

Keeping Aaron Jones sealed the deal that Packer offense will be outstanding again, maybe even a little better with Dillon playing more at RB. Lower quality O Line? No problem - never has been with Aaron Rodgers, and with the current run game as a change of pace, things should be fine. They're not gonna let Tonyan go, no way. We're about even on the cap right now, and we still have the Rodgers extension and the Adams extension in the coming days, which should make the Packers significant players for some quality free agents.

[Upnorth]

Keeping Aaron Jones sealed the deal that Packer offense will be outstanding again, maybe even a little better with Dillon playing more at RB. Lower quality O Line? No problem - never has been with Aaron Rodgers, and with the current run game as a change of pace, things should be fine. They're not gonna let Tonyan go, no way. We're about even on the cap right now, and we still have the Rodgers extension and the Adams extension in the coming days, which should make the Packers significant players for some quality free agents.

I feel you under value the oline tex. If the qb has less than 2 seconds on average he is going to have a rough day unless it is a quick release offense (we ate not). If the rb has no holes he is having a shitty day unless it is barry Sanders (he retired).

[texaspackerbacker]

In general, yes, but this is Aaron Rodgers we're talking about. He's excelled over the years even against a huge pass rush. And even without the sacred cow, Bakhtiari, Jones had big games against most teams. So yes, I certainly do value the O Line less than a lot of people - undervalue? We'll see, I guess.

[bobblehead]

They will take a step back. Why? Because they were the 2nd best offense all time efficiency wise. They really can only go down even with Bak. There will be work to make the OL functional until he gets back. Overall if we can get to the playoffs with 11-5 and win the division, but peak when we get there we have a similar shot as last year.

[texaspackerbacker]

hahahaha I bet you predicted a record about in that range last year and probably the same or worse the year before.

[RashanGary]

They will take a step back. Why? Because they were the 2nd best offense all time efficiency wise. They really can only go down even with Bak. There will be work to make the OL functional until he gets back. Overall if we can get to the playoffs with 11-5 and win the division, but peak when we get there we have a similar shot as last year.

I see a small step back in the first half of the season. The OL was so good in the regular season last year. I see a step back in regular season offense but a step up from the defense with so many growth players and so few aging players. Special team's cant be worse. So all on all, 11-5 sounds about right with a chance to really peak in the post season with OL continuity being the big wild card. It should be a good season for Packer fans again

[Sparkey]

A.Jones was outstanding running inside, but a lot of the credit for that should go to Linsley. They are going to really miss him. Hopefully someone steps up, but even then, th chemistry will take time to develop.

[bobblehead]

hahahaha I bet you predicted a record about in that range last year and probably the same or worse the year before.

Correct. Because predicting a 13 win season means you aren't being realistic. I'm not saying its impossible, but our road schedule was a nightmare. Remember, we played the SF JV team in SF this last season.

Go take a look at the win total futures action in the LV books. There are no "12 1/2" lines. There is a reason for that. The fact that you think predicting 11 wins is an insult instead of a supreme complement speaks volumes about the world you perceive. You live on fantasy Island Tex, I have known that for a decade now. If you want to put $100 on "11 1/2" over win totals for the Packers this season I'm game. I might lose, but you would be the fool making the bet regardless.

[texaspackerbacker]

11 1/2 meaning you win if they win 11 or less, I win if they win 12 or more? I'd take that bet anytime. Last season like basically every season, I looked at the schedule, and I didn't see any games I expected the Packers to lose. Inevitably, they slipped up several times - shit happens. However, betting on shit to happen/predicting negativity ain't "realistic". It's running scared - being afraid to be labeled a homer or something, and that's a pretty pathetic way to be.

[run pMc]

I'd be happy if GB won 11 games. That's not an insult, that likely wins the division a lands a #2 or #3 playoff seeding (out of 7). That's a decent starting spot for a playoff run.

I would NOT be shocked if there was a dip in the offense, if you assume regression to mean will happen. Something would have to happen (injuries or terrible OL play) for it to be drastically worse -- I still think they have the makings of a very good offense and should be in/near Top 5.

[bobblehead]

11 1/2 meaning you win if they win 11 or less, I win if they win 12 or more? I'd take that bet anytime. Last season like basically every season, I looked at the schedule, and I didn't see any games I expected the Packers to lose. Inevitably, they slipped up several times - shit happens. However, betting on shit to happen/predicting negativity ain't "realistic". It's running scared - being afraid to be labeled a homer or something, and that's a pretty pathetic way to be.

Yes. And you would be the sucker in that bet...even if you win. The idiot who buys a stock cuz "its the future" but its so over valued its silly isn't smart when the stock goes up....he is lucky. And he would be wise to get out real quick in such an event.

The idiot that bets any NFL team to win 12 games or more before a snap is played isn't smart...even if he proves to be right. By my count I have been on his site for 13 years. I don't ever recall you projecting LESS than 12 wins for the pack. You would have been right 4 times.

I am a fan as well. I hope we win 13 again, but I don't live on the same planet as you and Brandon, so I don't think the team is either a joke who won't win 8 games (brandon) or an iron clad lock to win 12 (you). As usual the truth is somewhere in between, and like with Brandon, my track record against your blind optimism is pretty good. That doesn't make me "running scared" or "predicting negativity" it just has me being realistic in my expectations.

[texaspackerbacker]

The only reason not to bet a team wins 12 or more - if they are good enough to win 12 or more - is injuries. Yeah, if Aaron Rodgers gets hurt or a team has a streak of injuries like the Niners had, then extreme shit can happen. However, the Packers with Aaron Rodgers and the ok not great overall current supporting cast they have should literally win every game. Sure, they'll probably screw up and lose several, but I'd certainly bet it isn't more than 3 or 4.

Have they even had these pick-up threads for 13 years or anything near it? I don't think so. I don't recall any year, though, going back to pre-Favre years that I would have predicted a Packer team with more than 4 losses. You have people whining about so few Super Bowls; I won't say i don't give a damn about Super Bowls, but I much prefer having a team that is a consistent winner just about every year for going on thirty years now than being one of those feast or famine teams that wins the SB but falls through the floor as often as not.