Tweet
DE Maxx Crosby, S Johnathan Abram, 2022 first, 2023 first, 2024 first, 2022 third
they have many scenarios, but this one would be palatable to me. Anything involving bringing in a high contract QB is a waste.
-
DE Maxx Crosby, S Johnathan Abram, 2022 first, 2023 first, 2024 first, 2022 third
they have many scenarios, but this one would be palatable to me. Anything involving bringing in a high contract QB is a waste.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi -
Thanks for posting that article. After going through it, I'd agree with you - this package upgrades that defense immediately and immensely, plus you get those picks. Find some old retread to start at QB this year and field a competetive team that is an old-school type of team.Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
Next year, you unleash the Love machine with what should be a helluva supporting cast."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
I would say, take this opportunity to tank a year and pick up a better draft picks for a yearOriginally posted by Fritz View PostComment
-
Play Love and run the ball a ton. They have the horses. Coach the hell out of him and see what he's got.C.H.U.D.Comment
-
Red goin' the NBA route.Originally posted by red View Post
I read an interesting article a few years ago in which the writer analyzed the tank as a strategy. The conclusion was that it generally does not get teams any further ahead than playing to win each year.
Not sure if I agree, but in this case I think the Packers are talented enough - if they get a couple more young studs out of a trade - that it would not be worth a tank job. I could see a 10-6 team that plays like it's the 70's - lots of running and a tough defense.
But I could be wrong. Last time I thought that, McGinn wrote an article to the effect that the Packers were finally talented enough that they could weather a Rodgers injury. Then Rodgers got injured and the team went like 2-6 or something."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
I watched that video, and it's the same one I saw yesterday. First of all, not one word actually from Rodgers' mouth. Secondly, even if you take every word from Tirico's mouth at face value, it backs up what I've been saying: much ado about very little; possibly Rodgers is justifiably pissed off, but he says he "loves Green Bay and the organization" - nothing remotely about wanting to leave or wanting to get Gutekunst fired. Tirico also said - presumably his take on it after talking to Rodgers - that this thing should get settle in the next couple of weeks. Why would anybody seeing this video think is supports any of the idiotic shit being spewed? Just in general, few things in sports or in the world in general are lower than news media people, yet a lot of ya'all seem to believe those bastards like gospel. That's pretty fucked up.Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
Fritz, to a great extent, I agree with your post above ("the dance has begun" one). If "only Tex" takes the position I take, then that makes everybody else either dead wrong or not having the balls to post obvious normality and common sense. It's a little disturbing that people are ready to basically throw Rodgers under the bus as well as basically call Gutekunst and LaFleur liars in their comments about this just because some media assholes say something. As for the Packers "bending over and accommodate Rodgers as much as possible without firing Gutekunst", hell yeah, why would they not? And all of them "conveniently blaming the media"? That also would be perfectly justified, because the God damned media bastards, even if they didn't just conjure this up out of thin air - which they still may well have, blew it way out of proportion for no reason other than to do harm to the team and its best player that we all love - or should.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
Make it happen, Ted!
I like it.
Kill Erin with kindness.
Then trade the bitch for a shit ton of value and reload for the next decade.Comment
-
Tirico also said - presumably his take on it after talking to Rodgers - that this thing should get settle in the next couple of weeks.
You should listen to the video again because that is not what he said.....Seems media pukes aren't the only ones that report infon in a way that fits a narrative.Comment
-
Exact words from the video: "we'll watch closely over the next couple of weeks how this plays out". That's different from what I said?What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
Silverstein was just interviewed on espn radio and said things were "irreconcilable"
He also said he doesn't think love will be the starter this year if rodgers is tradedComment
-
Things should get settledOriginally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
We'll see how things play out
They are far different, at least to me.
One infers things will be resolved the other says let's wait and see what happens.Comment
-
-
All leaked by the team to try & save face & make Rodgers the bad guy for when he’s traded. Some of you bought it. LolComment
-
So management brought back almost the entire team so they can then trade Rodgers, take a huge cap hit, and hand it over to Love? That's really your take on it all?Originally posted by Packers4Glory View PostGo PACKComment
-
Comment