As much as I appreciate Mad's 'optimism', count me in the 'Packers get curb-stomped camp'.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Packers-49ers Discussion Thread
Collapse
X
-
Yo Mad, with all due respect, you’ve got to get over the ‘Butte’ autograph debacle.Originally posted by MadtownPacker View PostYou know how much I detest Rogers and his bitch ass behavior. Previously thought this is going to be a for sure loss like always when 49ers are good. Now I don’t know, I have a sinking feeling this might turn out to be a W. Real going to put a cramp in getting Love some high draft picks coworkers. Instead Rogers is going to come through against the Niners when it really doesn’t fucking matter instead of all the times it did. He’s just the of kind of prick to stick it to the organization like that.
This is how this works. The only way he gets what he wants is by having a great year which equals a better record and a worse pick. This is how he give a big middle finger on the way out. Maybe the niners will break him and Love can come in and pull the upset. That’s what I’m rooting for.
In my shutdown corner days, I was working out at a Gold’s Gym, and in came Bill Schroeder, along with his pals Will Hendersen and Al Rossum. I asked Schroeder for an autograph. He refused unless I buy a copy of the Packers “hardbody” calendar the players were promoting.
I was like, no thanks, I ain’t queer, homie. Why the fuck would I want to buy calendar full of hardbodied homies?
Schroeder is still the greatest white WR in my book.
Comment
-
We need to take the ball out of rodgers hands this game, except for play action. When he is pressured this year he is panicking and screwing up. We get the run game going and use a bunch of pa and we will win. We try to throw throw throw 12 gets pressured and he throws another multipick game we are doomed.All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.
George Orwell
Comment
-
Packers have the fewest sacks in the NFL (0). 49ers have given up the fewest sacks in the NFL (1). So there's little reason to think the Packers will be able to get much pressure by rushing 4. Wonder if they'll try to bring a lot of pressure with blitzes, or rush 3 and drop 8 into coverage more.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View PostI sadly predict the Packers get owned tomorrow, maybe 41-13 type game.
Is that an intentionally mean Badger reference ? lolTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Well, newbie here, didn't see any introductory threads here so .... First post on Packerrats here I go
I predicted before the season began this would probably be a loss as I figured the this 49er team would be healthy unlike the JV team we faced out there last year. Now without E. Jenkins out there, our task against Bosa and co just got more difficult.
My main hope for tomorrow if we don't pull off the win is keep it close within a 7-14 point range. Do that and we still got plenty of time to get things cranked up again starting with the Steeelers.
Anyway, here's to hoping things are enjoyable for me here.
Comment
-
What eludes a lot of ya'all is that the Niners have a shitload of injuries at RB as well as a couple in the D Line.
It's unfortunate that Jenkins is out, but he was mediocre and wasted at OT anyway. This game is again gonna highlight the lack of importance of the O Line in the passing game, and I think we may be able to get some decent yardage with inside zone runs even with what we have in the O Line.
The key to the game will be preventing the Niners from eating up time with ball control. I'm pretty sure they won't be able to run it on us, but short passing could be a problem. If we just don't let them hold the ball for 70% or so of the game, Rodgers will do his usual thing, and with a few change of pace runs mixed in, we should be able to outscore them.
Ya'all who want to "take the ball out of Rodgers hands", I guess we should bring in Paul Chryst as our new OC. The Packers would be screwed, but at least it would help the Badgers.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
I would opt for the former, as rushing three means that Jeanine Garrapolo will have all day to scan the field and even wait for Kevin King to lose his coverage. I can't stand that rushing three defense, especially when nobody's getting home for Green Bay these days. But maybe Rashan Gary will come close!Originally posted by Joemailman View PostPackers have the fewest sacks in the NFL (0). 49ers have given up the fewest sacks in the NFL (1). So there's little reason to think the Packers will be able to get much pressure by rushing 4. Wonder if they'll try to bring a lot of pressure with blitzes, or rush 3 and drop 8 into coverage more."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment

Comment