Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Packers vs. WFT Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • #1

    Official Packers vs. WFT Discussion Thread

    Packers lead all-time series 19-16-1.

    Last meeting December 8, 2019. Packers beat Redskins 20-15. Aaron Jones rushed for 134 yards and 1 TD.

    Offensively WFT in 22nd in yards gained, 19th in scoring. 22nd in passing and 17th in rushing. Taylor Heinicke has passed for 1390 yards with 9 TD's and 6 INT's. Antonio Gibson is leading rusher with 357 yards and 3 TD's. Terry McLaurin is leading receiver with 428 yards and 3 TD's.

    Defensively WFT is surprisingly 32nd in yards allowed and 32nd in points allowed, having surrendered 186 points. They are 32nd in passing yards allowed and 20th in rushing yards allowed. Opposing QB's have thrown for 1857 yards with 16 TD passes and just 4 INT's. They have allowed 681 rushing yards with 6 TD's, allowing 4.0 YPC.

    Packers favored by 9.5. Over/under 49.5. Moneyline WFT +360, Packers -455.
    I can't run no more
    With that lawless crowd
    While the killers in high places
    Say their prayers out loud
    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
    A thundercloud
    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Packers will wear throwback uniforms.

    I can't run no more
    With that lawless crowd
    While the killers in high places
    Say their prayers out loud
    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
    A thundercloud
    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

    Comment

    • #3
      Reminds me of the Oakland A's during the period Ray Fosse played.

      Last edited by Sparkey; 10-19-2021, 10:12 AM.

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Sparkey View Post
        Reminds me of the Oakland A's during the period Ray Fosse played.

        I was thinking more old-school Oregon Ducks uni's.

        Comment

        • #5
          Skins crush the Pack this week.
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment

          • #6
            If the NFL can't stand Redskins, they should at least call them "Washington Team Football" - it makes a better abbreviation.
            What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

            Comment

            • #7
              And is helpful when trying to understand how a top d went to 32nd.
              All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

              George Orwell

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                If the NFL can't stand Redskins, they should at least call them "Washington Team Football" - it makes a better abbreviation.
                Ha ha, ironically, that's the same abbreviation that flashes in my mind when I read many of your posts.

                Comment

                • #9
                  I think Admiral Akbar, after carefully studying all the advanced analytics and Full 22 camera angles, has all the information regarding this game that you need to know.
                  It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Damn it I dont know how to attach an image but I have Akbar in my office
                    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by King Friday View Post
                      I think Admiral Akbar, after carefully studying all the advanced analytics and Full 22 camera angles, has all the information regarding this game that you need to know.
                      Emotional defeat of the supreme rival then wtf then the last undefeated team after wtf.
                      What could go wrong
                      All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

                      George Orwell

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Upnorth View Post
                        Emotional defeat of the supreme rival then wtf then the last undefeated team after wtf.
                        What could go wrong

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Sparkey View Post
                          Ha ha, ironically, that's the same abbreviation that flashes in my mind when I read many of your posts.
                          Savage.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            I would take the under on this game. Statistics will tell you otherwise, but the WFT defense has talent and playing against a QB like Rodgers may bring out their best. That still may be mediocre, but I'm just saying I don't expect their defense to play like the worst in the league come Sunday. Washington historically plays tough vs the Packers even when their team sucks.
                            It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              I wonder if Bak plays. WTF has 2 really good bookend edge guys. Would be nice to have Bak shut one down.

                              Otherwise a defense I thought would be special is playing....well, special. Without the top notch D, WTF lives up to their new abbreviation thanks to Tex.
                              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                              Working...
                              X