Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Banjo - Packers vs. Ravens

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    He played reasonably well and won his only other start. He played pretty well in relief when Lamar was injured, significantly better than Lamar had been playing, but I admit I think Lamar left pretty early.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
      Just an honest question for anyone who happens to watch a lot of NFL games. Is it just me or did Huntly look every bit as good as Lamaar. Nearly as good of a runner and a better more accurate passer.
      I'm with you.

      Huntley felt more composed than Jackson.

      IDK what it is about Jackson, but like Mayfield, he just doesn't blow my skirt up.

      Comment


      • #33
        Huntley is a good player. If I were a team in need of a QB I'd take a long look at him. Rough around the edges but he has a good arm and is accurate.
        Packers D played poorly -- edge (esp. Gary) gave up contain too many times which was weird because anyone could see it and they STILL didn't fix the issue. They also missed Kenny Clark in the middle. Agree with MLF they needed to play a little more aggressively -- I think the coverage played too far off and they didn't react fast enough to Andrews with different tactics (doubling, pressing, etc.). He had like 2/3 of their passing yards.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
          Has Huntley put together more than just the one good game? It's possible he got lucky in some ways. It's also possible the Packers D made him look better than he really is. To be clear, I like the guy - a helluva lot better than Justin Love, for example. But to rise to the level of Taylor Heinicke, for example, he needs to do it for at least a few games.
          Tex, you think every packer 4th stringer who isn't a QB is awesome so how is it you discount a guy who put 30 on our D?
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment


          • #35
            Remember, Tex thinks you could put any five Packerrats on the o-line and Rodgers would lead the team to victory.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Fritz View Post
              Remember, Tex thinks you could put any five Packerrats on the o-line and Rodgers would lead the team to victory.
              What I wouldn't give for a chance to get destroyed by aaron Donald!!
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #37
                The time it would take for him to step over your unconscious body after he puts you on the ground would be about the same as what Rodgers has most of the time to make a throw or escape.

                I discounted Tyler Huntley? No way. I said he seemed way better than Justin Love. I only suggested that it might be just a flash in the pan or caused by the Packers D. Odds are he really is about as good as he looked. And of course, there are some Packers I discount too - Kevin King is the first that comes to mind, maybe Crosby too this year.
                What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                Comment

                Working...
                X