Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bakh does an interview with Cheesehead TV

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bakh does an interview with Cheesehead TV

    I am not sure he could have played much more this year - even if they made the Super Bowl.

    Full read here. Hope the link works.


  • #2
    Damn, I love that guy. Great attitude. "You think to yourself ‘This is long enough, let’s just go. Maybe my knee will accept where my head is at.’ " I love that line.... love where his head is at, and the way the team has been handling this issue.

    Comment


    • #3
      Aaron Nagler must love his job, because he could be writing for a more prominent news organization. He and Wilde are the best Packer beat writers. Man, it sucks to not have had Bakh for the playoffs 2 years in a row. Hopefully, this fluid issue goes away with some more rest and rehab. 2 years in a row Packers have surrendered 5 sacks in a playoff loss. That likely doesn't happen with Bakh in there.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
        Aaron Nagler must love his job, because he could be writing for a more prominent news organization. He and Wilde are the best Packer beat writers. Man, it sucks to not have had Bakh for the playoffs 2 years in a row. Hopefully, this fluid issue goes away with some more rest and rehab. 2 years in a row Packers have surrendered 5 sacks in a playoff loss. That likely doesn't happen with Bakh in there.
        It's quite conceivable that would have made the difference the other night. Even if it only meant one or two more completions at key moments, that alone could have done. I suppose you could say that about any number of things, but that will always be one of the biggest "if onlies" I remember about this game. Having MVS on the field would be another - just one other guy named something other than "Adams" who Rodgers trusts enough to throw him the ball.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
          Aaron Nagler must love his job, because he could be writing for a more prominent news organization. He and Wilde are the best Packer beat writers. Man, it sucks to not have had Bakh for the playoffs 2 years in a row. Hopefully, this fluid issue goes away with some more rest and rehab. 2 years in a row Packers have surrendered 5 sacks in a playoff loss. That likely doesn't happen with Bakh in there.
          You do gotta wonder if Bakh and Jenkins were healthy what may have happened.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Thirteen Below View Post
            It's quite conceivable that would have made the difference the other night. Even if it only meant one or two more completions at key moments, that alone could have done. I suppose you could say that about any number of things, but that will always be one of the biggest "if onlies" I remember about this game. Having MVS on the field would be another - just one other guy named something other than "Adams" who Rodgers trusts enough to throw him the ball.
            MVS stretches defensive - I think he needs to be resigned, because they need that kinda guy with the WR group.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
              Aaron Nagler must love his job, because he could be writing for a more prominent news organization. He and Wilde are the best Packer beat writers. Man, it sucks to not have had Bakh for the playoffs 2 years in a row. Hopefully, this fluid issue goes away with some more rest and rehab. 2 years in a row Packers have surrendered 5 sacks in a playoff loss. That likely doesn't happen with Bakh in there.
              Some rag on Nagler, but I find myself agreeing with a lot of what he says. I’m not sure for much difference Bakh would have made this year. Rodgers had a lot to throw on his sacks (3.8 seconds), and three them were credited to Rodgers. The OTs actually graded out okay. The IOL not so much. I think last year would have made a huge difference.
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kcpackman View Post
                MVS stretches defensive - I think he needs to be resigned, because they need that kinda guy with the WR group.
                Agree, MVS stretches defenses; but how much can you offer MVS based on his production ? I could see a team giving him 5 MIL/Year. Would you ?
                TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by kcpackman View Post
                  You do gotta wonder if Bakh and Jenkins were healthy what may have happened.
                  so true

                  Or even if Dillon doesn't get hurt
                  TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                    Agree, MVS stretches defenses; but how much can you offer MVS based on his production ? I could see a team giving him 5 MIL/Year. Would you ?
                    Do you think some team will offer him that? I have no clue what his value is, to be honest. I suspect with all of his injuries this year, and his histories of drops (although I think he is generally over them) there are not going to be a lot of teas knocking at is door. But - I really dont know. $ MIL/year?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by kcpackman View Post
                      Do you think some team will offer him that? I have no clue what his value is, to be honest. I suspect with all of his injuries this year, and his histories of drops (although I think he is generally over them) there are not going to be a lot of teas knocking at is door. But - I really dont know. $ MIL/year?
                      He probably shouldn't get that much, but his speed could entice some team to overspend.
                      I can't run no more
                      With that lawless crowd
                      While the killers in high places
                      Say their prayers out loud
                      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                      A thundercloud
                      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                        Agree, MVS stretches defenses; but how much can you offer MVS based on his production ? I could see a team giving him 5 MIL/Year. Would you ?
                        Probably, yeah. That isn't that much money in today's NFL.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X