Tweet
Originally posted by Freak Out
View Post
-
I'm mean how could you not. Losing 2 all pros hurts but 3 1st 2 2nds and players....All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.
George Orwell -
Hadl-type trade for Rodgers. (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 1st, 2nd)Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
2024 1st and players for Adams.
Would be a shocker but seems somewhat fair, probably wouldn't get that many picks. Denver is taking on a bunch of salary though, but they might dump some salary with the players they send back.Comment
-
That’s exactly what the article said. Denver can take on ARods contract without having to do much but would have to clear cap space to get Adams. The players the Packers get back was needed to get Denver back under the cap.Originally posted by wthigoot View PostBut Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim HarmstonComment
-
The madness, of course, is the idiotic idea that the Packers would trade Rodgers even for a Herschel Walker level deal like that.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
So to you 1 or 2 great years with rodgers is better than setting up the next decade of very good years?Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View PostAll tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.
George OrwellComment
-
As the Packers got to see Love develop, I think it made them more all in on Rodgers.
If the Packers don’t trade 12 this offseason, that means they give up on 10. You can’t keep a guy on a rookie deal for 5 years and never play him. Unless he’s not it.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.Comment
-
^ Esp, a QB drafted in the first round whom they traded up to get.Comment
-
If the Packers thought they had the next big thing in the wings, they’d be trading Rodgers in a damn heartbeat.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.Comment
-
The problem is, they don't know yet. My memory is that Rodgers only really began to look good in his third year preseason. That's when you could see they had something.Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
Love is not there yet, his third season is coming up. And due to missing some time from COVID, he is even further behind. The timing is just not working for them; timing was bad to start with and got worse because of COVID.
They just have to guess what to do now. Either way could work out, or could blow up on them. It will be interesting to watch whatever they decide to do.Comment
-
100%. I would say not “know”, but an good inkling to maybe even possible. My guess is right now they don’t think (given their limited info) that JLove will be a long term type starter there.Originally posted by RashanGary View PostComment
-
It depends if they and Rodgers think it’s one more year total (and void years) or he resigns the type of contract they expect him to play on for two or three years. If it’s the latter, and my guess is it will be, then I think they trade Love for a rookie contract receiver or a draft pick this year to try to accumulate more assetsOriginally posted by RashanGary View PostComment
-
Originally posted by wthigoot View Post
QB's are way more NFL ready now than they were when AROD was drafted IMO. I really think they know, or have a view, of the huge, or lack of upside they have with Love by now. They knew Rodgers upside and it's why they slowly moved away from Favre. They seem to be doing the opposite hereTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
Packers still lose the trade on paper but yeah I would for sure do it because 39 years old plus phat contracts. Those picks are basically R2, R3 and R4 though since bottom of the round. Not nearly as good as meets the eye at first glance.Originally posted by Upnorth View PostComment
-
True except for the one this year. I'm assuming Packers would get #9. Some good choices there. Next year's wouldn't be so high, not sure where the Packers own picks would be.Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View PostComment
-
If we are considering taking R3 can we take a future year's #2 instead ?
When was out last 3rd round draft pick who was worth a sh#t ? I'm sure there were some, but gosh it doesn't seem like it
)
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
Comment