NEXT YEAR AARON RODGERS WILL BE

[Joemailman]

It's possible the 4 years for 200 million is correct AND it's a cap friendly deal for 2022.

[Joemailman]

Aaron Rodgers
@AaronRodgers12

Hey everyone, just wanted to clear some things up; YES I will be playing with the @packers next year, however, reports about me signing a contract are inaccurate, as are the supposed terms of the contract I “signed”. I’m very excited to be back ���� #year18❤️

[Bretsky]

[QUOTE=Joemailman;1111994]Aaron Rodgers
@AaronRodgers12

Hey everyone, just wanted to clear some things up; YES I will be playing with the @packers next year, however, reports about me signing a contract are inaccurate, as are the supposed terms of the contract I



Classic Drivel
AROD general message saying nothing; who knows if it's accurate

[King Friday]

This comment confuses me. I don't think Aaron thinks he screws the Packers unless he retires next year or something and then they're SOL on the guaranteed money. We shall see what the deal ultimately looks like.

He's not screwing the Packers. He's screwing his own chances of winning another title. I really don't think Rodgers NEEDS more money. He's got enough in the bank now to last quite a few lifetimes, and with his difficulty in relationships, he may only have to worry about his.

[texaspackerbacker]

HALLELUJAH!!! I watched Mcafee's account of the situation, and as usual what's coming from the media is speculation at best, bullshit at worst. But the bottom line is, as I for one said all along, the most extreme of good news is now a near sure thing. With the old cap number at $46 million, there is plenty of potential for a major decrease.

It's kinda comical to see some heads of idiots exploding in here, to use the term of one of those idiots. This deal as it's shaping up and Rodgers coming back in general for significant years is no surprise to me and shouldn't be a surprise to anybody with a lick of sense regarding the cap. Furthermore, bringing Rodgers back at very least solidifies excellence for whatever number of years he plays for Green Bay - Super Bowl? not guaranteed obviously, as we've managed to not make it these other years. As much as I would love one or multiple Packer Super Bowls, though, I can easily get along without that if we get 3 or 4 or 5 or more great seasons.

One more thing I want to take credit for getting right, I thought and said all along that the alternative was NOT Rodgers playing somewhere else. It was if he decided to retire and pursue any of the many other options he has. Thankfully, I guess he decided all of that will still be just as good x number of years in the future.

So whine on, fools and shitheads - several of ya'all have already gotten started hahahahaha. This is a GREAT day (apparently) - as expected.

[Fritz]

Is it just me or does this help trade him? Like in 3 years hos cap hit is 65m then 70m.
That will be probably 20% of the cap
If We Dont trade him we are so fucked.
Also by by Adams.
Package them together to Denver. 3 1sts a 2nd and a player.
Before seeing that contract I had hope.

When I see what Seattle got for Russell Wilson - younger, but not as good as Rodgers overall - which was two firsts, two seconds, a fifth, Noah Fant and Shelby Harris plus Drew Lock, for Wilson and a fourth - I wish the Pack had made that trade. I think if they had the money to re-sign many of their own guys fter trading Rodgers, plus the injection of youth in the two young players plus the #9 overall pick this year, they would have been competetive, with a good defense, really good, a good running game, and better special teams.

The future would've looked bright. But now they're going to "run it back" with a slightly less talented crew next year (no way they keep Rasul Douglas and Campbell and so on). Can they really get to a SB that way? I suppose we'll see, and some would argue that they have a better chance than if they'd traded Rodgers. But what about two or three years from now?

I do think that if Rodgers has committed to play two more seasons that tells us the organization is not high on Jordan Love. If they really thought he was the next Lynn Dickey, even, they might've encouraged Rodgers to go down the road. I don't know if he's just going to be a first-round backup, but I guess Mitch Trubisky was, too.

[George Cumby]

When I see what Seattle got for Russell Wilson - younger, but not as good as Rodgers overall - which was two firsts, two seconds, a fifth, Noah Fant and Shelby Harris plus Drew Lock, for Wilson and a fourth - I wish the Pack had made that trade.

Agree.

[oldbutnotdeadyet]

HALLELUJAH!!! I watched Mcafee's account of the situation, and as usual what's coming from the media is speculation at best, bullshit at worst. But the bottom line is, as I for one said all along, the most extreme of good news is now a near sure thing. With the old cap number at $46 million, there is plenty of potential for a major decrease.

It's kinda comical to see some heads of idiots exploding in here, to use the term of one of those idiots. This deal as it's shaping up and Rodgers coming back in general for significant years is no surprise to me and shouldn't be a surprise to anybody with a lick of sense regarding the cap. Furthermore, bringing Rodgers back at very least solidifies excellence for whatever number of years he plays for Green Bay - Super Bowl? not guaranteed obviously, as we've managed to not make it these other years. As much as I would love one or multiple Packer Super Bowls, though, I can easily get along without that if we get 3 or 4 or 5 or more great seasons.

One more thing I want to take credit for getting right, I thought and said all along that the alternative was NOT Rodgers playing somewhere else. It was if he decided to retire and pursue any of the many other options he has. Thankfully, I guess he decided all of that will still be just as good x number of years in the future.

So whine on, fools and shitheads - several of ya'all have already gotten started hahahahaha. This is a GREAT day (apparently) - as expected.

The value of this signing won't be known until next year at the earliest. If the packers win a super bowl, it is a good signing, if they fail once again, it is a horseshit signing.

[RashanGary]

It looks like the end of Brees type situation. Good team. In it. But no titles.

[texaspackerbacker]

RG, it kinda seems what you said in the other thread is just about diametrically the opposite of what you are saying here hahahaha.

[RashanGary]

RG, it kinda seems what you said in the other thread is just about diametrically the opposite of what you are saying here hahahaha.

It is the same. You will still remember the MVP Rodgers years without a ring. I do not know if the Packers will be a team of the 2020s. But you will remember these years.

[Massive J]

Agree.

Absolutely.

[Bretsky]

HALLELUJAH!!! I watched Mcafee's account of the situation, and as usual what's coming from the media is speculation at best, bullshit at worst. But the bottom line is, as I for one said all along, the most extreme of good news is now a near sure thing. With the old cap number at $46 million, there is plenty of potential for a major decrease.

It's kinda comical to see some heads of idiots exploding in here, to use the term of one of those idiots. This deal as it's shaping up and Rodgers coming back in general for significant years is no surprise to me and shouldn't be a surprise to anybody with a lick of sense regarding the cap. Furthermore, bringing Rodgers back at very least solidifies excellence for whatever number of years he plays for Green Bay - Super Bowl? not guaranteed obviously, as we've managed to not make it these other years. As much as I would love one or multiple Packer Super Bowls, though, I can easily get along without that if we get 3 or 4 or 5 or more great seasons.

One more thing I want to take credit for getting right, I thought and said all along that the alternative was NOT Rodgers playing somewhere else. It was if he decided to retire and pursue any of the many other options he has. Thankfully, I guess he decided all of that will still be just as good x number of years in the future.

So whine on, fools and shitheads - several of ya'all have already gotten started hahahahaha. This is a GREAT day (apparently) - as expected.

You get ABSOLUTE CREDIT for predicting AROD's destination every step along the way
But
You also get credit for being the MVI, or the Most Valuable Idiot in this forum for blaming the GD media every step along the way when it was Rodgers created all of this drama and then after hinting how all of this would be resolved much sooner played the waiting game, and his poker game ended up getting him exactly what he wanted. I give Sherin credit for all of this. In the end he cares about three and they are a total of 9 letters

Me
Myself
I

[Bretsky]

The value of this signing won't be known until next year at the earliest. If the packers win a super bowl, it is a good signing, if they fail once again, it is a horseshit signing.

THIS

If the Packers could get close to what the Broncos got for Russell, it's a tough call.

My very slight bias was to keep Rodgers at a fair deal; but whether we win a Super Bowl with Rodgers will only tell if it's the right call.

It would be nice if Rodgers would be the MVP of the playoffs instead of shitting on himself as he has done in the playoffs the last two years. The Truth has been painful lately

[bobblehead]

You get ABSOLUTE CREDIT for predicting AROD's destination every step along the way
But
You also get credit for being the MVI, or the Most Valuable Idiot in this forum for blaming the GD media every step along the way when it was Rodgers created all of this drama and then after hinting how all of this would be resolved much sooner played the waiting game, and his poker game ended up getting him exactly what he wanted. I give Sherin credit for all of this. In the end he cares about three and they are a total of 9 letters

Me
Myself
I

Someone else here has predicted Rodgers would never leave the packers back in April of 2021 if I recall. I never thought it was the best move for the team, but I never doubted it would go down pretty close to the way it has. We have a 2 year window with less of a team than we had last year when we went one and done.